Do These Pics Look Oversharpened

[iLuveKetchup]

Do these pics look oversharpened? They look fine on my monitor. But someone commented on jagged lines w/ their screen. Comments?

http://iLuveKetchup.smugmug.com/photos/136130619-L.jpg

http://iLuveKetchup.smugmug.com/photos/136130641-L.jpg

http://iLuveKetchup.smugmug.com/photos/136130488-L.jpg

http://iLuveKetchup.smugmug.com/photos/136130509-L.jpg

http://iLuveKetchup.smugmug.com/photos/136130548-L.jpg

http://iLuveKetchup.smugmug.com/photos/136130568-L.jpg

http://iLuveKetchup.smugmug.com/photos/136130524-L.jpg

[cosworth]

Looks good here. I have 1920x1200 res though. They may be looking at it with 1024x768 which would show jaggies perhaps.

Tripod obviously, but what wwas your sharpening workflow?

[buddy4344]

Here at work I am on a Dell 17" flat screen. These look sharp, but no sign of oversharpening.

[iLuveKetchup]

Thanks for the quick replies!! I am running 1920x1200 as well & it looked clean to me. As far as the workflow, I just bumped the USM a little 100/.5/1 on CS2.

[Palladium]

;) 1680x1050 look good

[Killie]

1280x1024, no jaggies here, all pics look really good.

[iLuveKetchup]

^ Thank you all for checking!!

[hTr]

No Halo, no jagged edges, Nice clean image and almost no noise. All and all they look great, I've got a 19" LCD calibrated.

[Radtech1]

How do the prints look?

That is really the only thing that matters.

Rad

[CyberDyneSystems]

These tiny reduced jpegs look simply fantastic on my 21" CRT at work.

[R_Metzel]

;) 1680x1050 look good
X2 :)

[inthedeck]

1280x1024 look OK on this CRT here at work.

[Curtis N]

My LCD at work has a native res. of 1280x1024, but it's set to 1024x768. Maybe that's the reason I can see some jagged diagonals, but only if I'm looking for them.

I've noticed in my own shots that when they look good at home on my CRT, they'll look a bit oversharpened on my work LCD.

God only knows what they would look like at 800x600, which I believe is still the Windows default that a lot of people (non-photographers) never change.

I guess you can't please everyone. ;)

[cosworth]

1024 x 768 surpassed 800x600 a while ago.

[feilb]

The shots, at least at their size, look pretty good. It is tough to gage oversharpening with reduced size pictures. You can tell if a picture is oversharpened when high contrast areas begin to develop "halos".

[jej826]

1280x1024 here.They look tack sharp,and not a sign of overshrpening.

[iLuveKetchup]

Thanks for the follow up guys!

[anglext]

I'm on my laptop which is 1024x768 and they look great. No sign of oversharpening at all.

[knt3424]

How do the prints look?

That is really the only thing that matters.

Rad


Not if you design websites ......

[phocalphobe]

1800x1440 on sony f500 and looking very good. nice shots.

can you post exif?

[calicokat]

Looking good to me, nice work on these

[iLuveKetchup]

Looking good to me, nice work on these
Thanks a lot! It was just a spur of the moment kind of thing. 2 members from the local s2000 club just bought their bikes. I had the camera & tripod in the trunk, so I said why not fire a couple of exposures. Proper photoshoot to come.

[CrazyPuma]

What video card and other equipment they're using may also affect things. Hubby and I use the same monitor but what a pic looks like on his screen vs. mine is different, to say the least.

They look fine/superb on my 19" CRT at 1600x1200 and 1280x960, degrade slightly but still look almost the same at 1024x768, and start to look a bit jagged in a few small areas per pic at 800x600

[Geo]

Good shoot, look nice for me, I like the last one.

[goforphoto]

These look spot on and tack sharp to me.

[whakojacko]

am I the only 1600x1200 here?
Anyways they look fine on my monitor.

[inthedeck]

I just set up my new machine, on my dell 2001FP yesterday, and 1600x1200 looks good to me. Huey corrected, it's pretty nice...

I will have a go on these again, when I get home.

[chunchma]

what equipment did you use?

[iLuveKetchup]

what equipment did you use?

I used a 5D w/ 17-40 for the wide angle shots & 70-200 for the rest.

Thanks again everyone!

[Radtech1]

Originally Posted by Radtech1
How do the prints look?

That is really the only thing that matters.

Rad
Not if you design websites ......

Point taken.

I should have asked:

How do shots look in thier final format? For example, if that is prints, how do the prints look?

That is really the only thing that matters.

Rad

[gbart]

I'm viewing them on a 23" Mac Cinema Display at 1600 X 1000 and they look fabulous! Great job!