PDA

View Full Version : 10D JPEG Question

WI10DUser
5th of April 2004 (Mon), 12:52
Are there any benefits to shooting in Large Fine JPEG vs. Small Fine JPEG when the end result is an image size of 1024 x 768? Will the larger file be a better quality image than the smaller file? Thanks!
CyberDyneSystems
5th of April 2004 (Mon), 13:18
If the inteneded end result is only a 1034X768 image,. then no... not for the 1024X768 image there isn't...

But My GOD man,. why on earth would you want a $1,500.00 dollar 6 megapixel camera to take only .75 megapixel images with?????

Shoot at the highest quality in case you .. for some reason down the road actually want to print an image.. :roll:
scottbergerphoto
5th of April 2004 (Mon), 14:47
But My GOD man,. why on earth would you want a $1,500.00 dollar 6 megapixel camera to take only .75 megapixel images with?????


Well said!
PacAce
5th of April 2004 (Mon), 16:40
Another thing to consider...you may want to crop your picture and if you start out with a small image, it can only get smaller!
maderito
5th of April 2004 (Mon), 18:04
Personally, I would prefer to edit a full resolution image (3072 X 2048) and then downsize it to 1024 X 768 in software. If I were not post processing, then I'd shoot at the lower resolution.
scottbergerphoto
6th of April 2004 (Tue), 08:55
8:30 tonight, Direct TV #206, UCONN vs. Lady Vols.
Go UCONN!
pradeep1
6th of April 2004 (Tue), 17:00
If the inteneded end result is only a 1034X768 image,. then no... not for the 1024X768 image there isn't...

But My GOD man,. why on earth would you want a $1,500.00 dollar 6 megapixel camera to take only .75 megapixel images with?????

Shoot at the highest quality in case you .. for some reason down the road actually want to print an image.. :roll:

So you can fit 3952 photos on a 32 MB compact flash card, duh, what where you thinking CDS? :P