PDA

View Full Version : Just got a new DSLR camera?


CanonUser
8th of April 2004 (Thu), 19:52
For the new folks who just jumped in to the wonderful and confusing world of digital photography, I hope the veterans here can contribute a few facts and tips on how to most effectively use the camera. A couple of basic instruction on how to use or where to learn about lens, flash, gear, vendor, pitfalls, and mistakes to avoid would be an excellent start.

Here is my contribution...

PORTRAIT: The photographer creates the portrait and the lens captures the image. Thus, depending on the situation, a certain lens can be a better choice but there is no such thing as a "perfect portrait lens."
A portrait photo comprises of the subject, the lighting, the pose, the scene or background, the mood, and the composition. The lens ties all of these together.

But the most important ingredient of a portrait is the subject's spirit and essence; Without these qualities, the photo will be lifeless no matter how great the photo looks. Technical error can be overlooked if the photo captures the heart and mind of the viewer. Here is an example...

http://www.photosig.com/go/photos/view?id=1181924
http://albums.photo.epson.com/j/ViewPhoto?u=4182937&a=31184488&p=67659454

That said, there are a few lens that compliment imperfections found on a person's body or facial features. Lens with a field-of-view equals to the focal lenght of 85-135mmm (35mm format equivalent) tends to make the subject appear a bit thinner, and therefore, a little more desirable (may be). A lens that has a wider apeture is also preferred. An aperture of f2.8 or wider will give the background a nice blur (called bokeh) and pop the main subject out from everything else in the photo.

Happy Shooting,
Alan

robertwgross
8th of April 2004 (Thu), 20:01
An aperture of f2.8 or wider will give the background a nice blur (called bokeh) and pop the main subject out from everything else in the photo.


Alan, at least to my way of thinking, bokeh is a little more complicated than just a blurred background.

If you have any bright points of light in the background, and if those points are nicely blurred, then that is good. Sometimes you can get the nice, blurred points that are uniformly symmetric. If they have some interesting blurred color tint to contrast with the main subject, that is nice also.

If the blurred light points get too distinct, then the viewer's eyes will try to discern what they are, or what they mean. Of course, they may have little meaning. Bokeh, to some photographers, sort of sets a mood. From the technical standpoint, it is hard to explain, but I know good bokeh when I see it (joke).

---Bob Gross---

G3
8th of April 2004 (Thu), 20:08
An aperture of f2.8 or wider will give the background a nice blur (called bokeh) and pop the main subject out from everything else in the photo.


Alan, at least to my way of thinking, bokeh is a little more complicated than just a blurred background.

If you have any bright points of light in the background, and if those points are nicely blurred, then that is good. Sometimes you can get the nice, blurred points that are uniformly symmetric. If they have some interesting blurred color tint to contrast with the main subject, that is nice also.

If the blurred light points get too distinct, then the viewer's eyes will try to discern what they are, or what they mean. Of course, they may have little meaning. Bokeh, to some photographers, sort of sets a mood. From the technical standpoint, it is hard to explain, but I know good bokeh when I see it (joke).

---Bob Gross---

I agree. A blurred background is just a blurred background. Bokeh is the quality and characteristics a particular lens gives that blurring. It's sort of the 'personality' of that lens.

CanonUser
8th of April 2004 (Thu), 20:16
An aperture of f2.8 or wider will give the background a nice blur (called bokeh) and pop the main subject out from everything else in the photo.


Alan, at least to my way of thinking, bokeh is a little more complicated than just a blurred background.

If you have any bright points of light in the background, and if those points are nicely blurred, then that is good. Sometimes you can get the nice, blurred points that are uniformly symmetric. If they have some interesting blurred color tint to contrast with the main subject, that is nice also.

If the blurred light points get too distinct, then the viewer's eyes will try to discern what they are, or what they mean. Of course, they may have little meaning. Bokeh, to some photographers, sort of sets a mood. From the technical standpoint, it is hard to explain, but I know good bokeh when I see it (joke).

---Bob Gross---

I agree. A blurred background is just a blurred background. Bokeh is the quality and characteristics a particular lens gives that blurring. It's sort of the 'personality' of that lens.

True, I just want to gently introduce new users to a new term.

Regards,
Alan

tivoli2
10th of April 2004 (Sat), 12:52
As the background goes out of focus, the diaphragm of the lens begins to come into focus. The fewer the blades that the diaphragm is made up of and the straighter their inner edges, the more it is apparent and the worse the bokeh.

CanonUser
14th of April 2004 (Wed), 12:54
Just found this website that offers lots of tips on how to take better portrait, specially children portrait. Hope you got something out of it...
http://ilp.tlcwe.com/forums/index.php?s=8873ed0a46141456a23fd0520fcacff3&act=S C&c=1
Here is an example of works found there
http://ilp.tlcwe.com/forums/index.php?s=2c6bbeca4f36a7235ceae39cbbfac6a4&act=S T&f=5&t=25432&st=0&#entry237745

Regards,
Alan