Deep Purple @ CIA, Wales part 2

[shesgotthepic]

Ok guys, comments taken aboard so here they are again with a little more PP. Or rather, a few of them and then some new ones.

1 - brightened it up a bit.
http://www.oscarssons.org/shegot/dp33/1.jpg

2 - same with this one
http://www.oscarssons.org/shegot/dp33/2.jpg

3 - upped exposure, fill light and changed WB in LR from "as shot" to "auto".
http://www.oscarssons.org/shegot/dp33/3.jpg

4 - upped exposure added fill light.
http://www.oscarssons.org/shegot/dp33/4.jpg

5 - cropped in a bit to get rid of headstock brightened it a tad bit more.
http://www.oscarssons.org/shegot/dp33/6.jpg

6 - that's how fun it can be to play in that band
http://www.oscarssons.org/shegot/dp33/9.jpg

7 - found this instead of the one I posted before. Cropped in and upped exposure
http://www.oscarssons.org/shegot/dp33/10.jpg

8 - how do you find time to adjust your glasses while playing?
http://www.oscarssons.org/shegot/dp33/11.jpg

[René Damkot]

Adjusted exposure looks a lot better.
#6 is nice as well.

[livewire-photography.com]

Much much better, 6 and 8 are really awsome
Nice set She

[CanonXTuser]

Much much better, 6 and 8 are really awsome
Nice set She

6 and 8 are really awesome. I like the orig. 1 better. If somehow you can blend the two versions you would have a pretty much perfect pci.

Shows that you had room to further push your shots.

Told everyone this was top work! :D

[livewire-photography.com]

She just a quick one, why were they shot at ISO 100? and not higher?
Cheers

[CanonXTuser]

She just a quick one, why were they shot at ISO 100? and not higher?
Cheers

you shot these at iso 100??? no way! wow. you had lots of lattitude. explains why the blacks were very clean of noise.

[René Damkot]

ISO 100 ???
No wonder the drummer is wearing sunglasses :lol:

[johnstoy]

The previous #1 was better...

[DwightMcCann]

The problem with LR is that you can't make selective adjustments such as when one guy is in the "shade". These are fun shots. A little soft (exported directly from LR?)

[René Damkot]

The previous #1 was better...

Not for the middle guy...
Argueably (did I type that right?)for the outer two.
I agree, a bit of merging the two wouldn't hurt ;)

[shesgotthepic]

She just a quick one, why were they shot at ISO 100? and not higher?
Cheers
It wasn't deliberate. I was busy elsewhere and basically ran down during half of the second song tore the camera out of the bag and started shooting. I didn't check what settings the camera was on or anything.

1 on here is actually the first shot I took.

She

[livewire-photography.com]

It wasn't deliberate. I was busy elsewhere and basically ran down during half of the second song tore the camera out of the bag and started shooting. I didn't check what settings the camera was on or anything.

1 on here is actually the first shot I took.

She

Well they aint to shabby if i say so myself.
cheers

[shesgotthepic]

Some of you said that a merger between the first version of 1 (in post 1 from Cardiff) and the one I posted here might work. So I gave it a try.

Thank god for this site or I would never have known how to do things with masks. However, I thought the jeans on the singer were too bright doing that so I added a third layer, darkened it slightly and masked it getting darekr jeans back in.

Yes, I know there is a slight halo around the singer because I wasn't out to do a prefct job at it, just seeing how it would look.

Here you go:

http://www.oscarssons.org/shegot/dp33/composite.jpg

[johnstoy]

Holy poopski...that's amazingly great... Even the middle guy is visible AOK... nice contrasts...fabulous...