::RANT:: The baby forum...

[manipula]

I know it's a free world and all, and that when you have kids they become the centre of your world and it's a proud day etc...

BUT DO WE NEED THE PEOPLE FORUM TURNING INTO A KINDERGARTEN!??

I'm not kidding, it's plain sickening to see one relentless poor baby photo after another!80% of them aren't even any more considered than a quick snap.

:evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: AAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYY DAVE!

[cdifoto]

Don't view then. ;)

[manipula]

But I'm a huge portrait fan, and there are on occasion photos of people above the age of three appear! ;)

And the thread titles never actually say 'baby content' either do they? :p GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!

[Skrim17]

so babies aren't people?

[manipula]

Yes.

But it doesn't explain the abundance of photos of kids. If it gets any worse I'll have to wear a nappy/diper to get in the door.

People should be posting pics up for comments and critique and sharing, stuff they;ve put a bit of effort into, not just another cute picture of "our Johnny with his finger up his nose" out of focus, under exposed and with the lens on backwards...

And in case anyone's not got their humour meter switched on today, there is a sense of of comical despair in my posts, but you can;t convey that in cyberspace without a ;) can you? So, ;) ;) just for good measure.

It just grates me like running finger nails down a blackboard.

[rhys]

Should see the gun-toting babies of Illinois then :d

[manipula]

???

Dare I ask? Or will it make me want to burn myself at the stake?

[rhys]

???

Dare I ask? Or will it make me want to burn myself at the stake?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6662213.stm