View Full Version : 85mm f/1.8 USM ?
dennykyser
16th of May 2004 (Sun), 10:41
I recently got this lens and am loving it. I have shoot in a few hours and have not done this test, hoping someone on here has.
at what apeture are you getting the sharpest images. I understand for normal portraits, dont always desire a sharp photo but what I am shooting today I will. Hoping you guys have read a report or heard what settings are best. Thanks
Andy_T
16th of May 2004 (Sun), 11:44
I'm guessing here, as I don't have that lens ...
but a rule of thumb is that the optimum sharpness of any lens normally is 2 f-stops below the maximum ... minimum ... whatever - the highest number that's printed on your lens :lol:
So if the highest numbers written on your lens are f/32, f/22 and f/16, then f/16 might be a good starting point.
Anyone who knows that better, please point out if I'm totally wrong!
Best regards,
Andy
G3
16th of May 2004 (Sun), 12:42
Denny,
I have that lens also and use it extensively. It is so sharp at almost every aperture that it's really hard to notice much difference, but the sweet spot on this one seems to be f8 and f11. But...like I said, it really doesn't matter much...this lens is like a razor across the board.
dennykyser
16th of May 2004 (Sun), 12:48
Thanks, makes me feel even better about the lens. I used to feel like that about my 100 f/2 but when I got my 10D opted for the 50 f/1.4 and 85, feel like I have it covered now. And thanks for letting me know the sweet spots. Denny
roanjohn
16th of May 2004 (Sun), 22:31
The 85 f1.8 will start to get sharp at around 2.8-5.6. It is a very sharp lens.
Ro1
garethhhhh
17th of May 2004 (Mon), 00:28
It is a very sharp lens.
this is a 100% crop of a picture I shot yesterday:
http://www.garethhhhh.co.uk/images/cdpp/crw_1219.jpg
File Name
CRW_1219.CRW
Camera Model Name
Canon EOS 10D
Shooting Date/Time
16/05/2004 10:28:09
Shooting Mode
Aperture-Priority AE
Tv( Shutter Speed )
1/2000
Av( Aperture Value )
3.5
Metering Mode
Partial
Exposure Compensation
0
ISO Speed
100
Lens
85.0 mm
Focal Length
85.0 mm
Image Size
3072x2048
Image Quality
RAW
dennykyser
17th of May 2004 (Mon), 00:37
Had great luck with the lens today and as evening set in was a life saver too as my 70-200 f/4L was getting to slow, 85 was back in action for the rest of the shoot. Thanks guys
Jesper
17th of May 2004 (Mon), 00:58
I'm guessing here, as I don't have that lens ...
but a rule of thumb is that the optimum sharpness of any lens normally is 2 f-stops below the maximum ... minimum ... whatever - the highest number that's printed on your lens :lol:
So if the highest numbers written on your lens are f/32, f/22 and f/16, then f/16 might be a good starting point.
Anyone who knows that better, please point out if I'm totally wrong!
Best regards,
Andy
Andy, you got it the wrong way around, the rule of thumb is: the lens performs best when you stop it down 2 stops from the largest aperture. The largest aperture means the smallest number.
Two stops down from f/1.8 is f/4.0. So probably that lens would be best at around f/4.0 or f/5.6.
msvadi
17th of May 2004 (Mon), 08:26
you, probably, have to stop it down to f/4-5.6 to get sharper images. and, probably, to f/8 for the max. sharpness. But, IMHO, don't worry about that. There are plenty of other factors to consider first: the light, the distance to the subject and the background (for outdoor portraits, for example, people usually want to blur the background but leave all parts of the face sharp in focus) etc... Give the priority to those things when you choose aperture. It's not a big deal if you loose a little bit in terms of sharpness in order to get an overall better photo.
roanjohn
17th of May 2004 (Mon), 09:07
Examples:
For portraits, I tend to not use anything above f4....In fact, I mostly hover around f1.8-f2.8 for better background blur. Even wide open, this lens performs superbly. The only thing to watch out for is CA/PF on anything below 2.8.........It should not occur on anything above that.
Wide open:
http://www.pbase.com/image/28551389.jpg
At f2:
http://www.pbase.com/image/28588909.jpg
Be careful when shooting wide open.........the DOF is paper thing so slight movement and you end up with an OOFFF shot.
Ro1
dennykyser
17th of May 2004 (Mon), 09:20
Thanks for the help.. this was my project yesterday.
http://ompi.onemodelplace.com/OMP_Images/Photographer/58389/58389_p_90DAAAA2-2B3D-897A-273F069EA1116D7B.jpg
Jesper
17th of May 2004 (Mon), 12:08
Aha..... that reminds me why photography is more interesting than programming computers (my job)...... :wink: :lol:
roanjohn
17th of May 2004 (Mon), 12:14
Thanks for the help.. this was my project yesterday.
http://ompi.onemodelplace.com/OMP_Images/Photographer/58389/58389_p_90DAAAA2-2B3D-897A-273F069EA1116D7B.jpg
Well......nice and sharp.
Is that wide open??
.
.
.
.
or stopped down??
Ro1
dennykyser
17th of May 2004 (Mon), 12:51
Was inside a showroom and used available light so was at 2.0
G3
17th of May 2004 (Mon), 20:10
Denny,
Here's one of my wedding shots that was made with the 85mm f1.8. It was shot at ISO100 and a f5.6 using ETTL flash (550EX) on a stroboframe.
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-4/166972/105_0558.jpg
dennykyser
17th of May 2004 (Mon), 20:17
great shot.. and very sharp. Thanks for sharing.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.