aeroshots2003
18th of May 2004 (Tue), 12:27
Can someone help me with this problem :
Currently I still use wet film and scan images at 2820dpi with Scan Dual II resulting in a full frame of 3990 x 2660 = + 10k pixels. This is sufficient for magazines to use since their requirement is 3000 pixels horizontally. This means I can roughly crop 1/4 of a full frame and still meet their requirements.
I would be interested to switch to digital, but financially the 1Ds and 1D MkII are out of my league. On the other hand the next cameras don't seem to meet the above-mentioned minima :
D30 : 2160 x 1440
D60 : 3088 x 2055
10D : 3088 x 2055 (~ 300D)
1D : 2496 x 1662
Recently however, I heard that digital pixels should not be compared with (read : are better than) the pixels I retrieve from slide scans. Does this mean the high res images of a 1D can be used up to A3 format prints with still sufficient quality for the magazines? The limited number of pixels does not give me much room for cropping I suppose? Does anybody have any experience as to delivering digital images to magazines?
I would be seriously interested in the 1D (non MkII) because of its :
- 8 fps
- 16 f RAW burst rate
- only 1.3 x
- solid construction
- low noise with high ISO
-...
Any pro's / cons why I should (not) consider the 1D?
Thanks for your advice,
Johan
Currently I still use wet film and scan images at 2820dpi with Scan Dual II resulting in a full frame of 3990 x 2660 = + 10k pixels. This is sufficient for magazines to use since their requirement is 3000 pixels horizontally. This means I can roughly crop 1/4 of a full frame and still meet their requirements.
I would be interested to switch to digital, but financially the 1Ds and 1D MkII are out of my league. On the other hand the next cameras don't seem to meet the above-mentioned minima :
D30 : 2160 x 1440
D60 : 3088 x 2055
10D : 3088 x 2055 (~ 300D)
1D : 2496 x 1662
Recently however, I heard that digital pixels should not be compared with (read : are better than) the pixels I retrieve from slide scans. Does this mean the high res images of a 1D can be used up to A3 format prints with still sufficient quality for the magazines? The limited number of pixels does not give me much room for cropping I suppose? Does anybody have any experience as to delivering digital images to magazines?
I would be seriously interested in the 1D (non MkII) because of its :
- 8 fps
- 16 f RAW burst rate
- only 1.3 x
- solid construction
- low noise with high ISO
-...
Any pro's / cons why I should (not) consider the 1D?
Thanks for your advice,
Johan