PDA

View Full Version : As promised--Shootsac review


Tish
22nd of June 2007 (Fri), 23:20
I'll be posting another message with the details on the seminar I attended this week, but I'm prepping for a wedding for tomorrow & still kinda digesting this week's mega experience. (There's a part 1 post on my blog if you're interested.)So I'll concentrate on the shootsac review for now. :)

I was fortunate to spend part of this week in training with Jessica Claire, and was able to experience the shootsac first hand. Let me say up front it's fabulous! As stated in the literature, it is NOT intended for storage, and it will not allow you to carry a body with an attached lens--but the amount you can carry in it is really amazing. I hauled it all over Seattle for three straight days, carrying two - three lenses at a time, plus a 550 EX, an ST-E2, batteries for everything, and all the usual purse essentials, with no trouble at all.

The 70-200 2.8 IS is a tight fit, and if you leave the hood on in it's useful position, the end of the lens will definitely stick out of the bag--which would be fine for weddings when you need quick access. With the hood on backwards, the cover can still protect the lens. The 17-55 IS fits in snugly with the hood on correctly--neither lens will fall out as they are definitely well fitted. Smaller lenses fall more deeply into the pockets and are also in no danger of falling out--at various points during the weekend, I had my 85 1.8 or Tokina 12-24 in there, plus another photog's TS-65 or 24 mm. No issues fitting any of the lenses in, though the TS was a bit trickier to pull back out. And I was all over the place, climbing on things, falling off things (literally, the bruises are huge), diving under things--everything stayed very securely in place. The back pockets, closest to your body, have snaps to keep them closed and are the safest place for CF cards, wallets, etc.

The removeable covers are not only attractive, they're useful. They're backed with a lens cleaning cloth material, and pulled off, can be used as a "seat cover" for brides nervous about their dresses. It's a good size for this as it can easily be hidden beneath most dresses.

As a portrait shoot bag or a "touristing" bag, I know I'll get a lot of use out of it, and I love the fact that it simply isn't an obvious photo bag. The wedding test will be tomorrow--I'm used to shooting with two bodies slung on me at once, but as I'm seconding and not primary, I'm going to try using just one. If you're already a one body shooter, you may just fall in love with this bag.

One caveat, soon to be corrected. The shootsac ships without a shoulder pad, and fully loaded with larger lenses, it needs one. I was repeatedly reassured that one is coming, and will ship to current owners as soon as available. I pulled the one off my lowepro for now and it does make a big difference.

Oh, and for you guys who think it's too girly: That's John Michael Cooper of altF ( http://www.altf.com ) --he of the flaming bride fame--with his. They come with the basic black cover standard, but even the guys were picking up some of the others.

Grace
22nd of June 2007 (Fri), 23:23
cool indeed :) what an awesome opportunity! JC rocks! Along with JMC- cool peeps out there doing some serious photography :)

tlc
23rd of June 2007 (Sat), 00:49
already ordered mine the day they went live. they are beautiful!

liza
23rd of June 2007 (Sat), 10:42
I'm intrigued. What type of fabric do they use in the construction? It looks somewhat like the same padded material one might use for automobile headliner. I'm a seamstress as well, so I'm finding this quite interesting.

Tish
23rd of June 2007 (Sat), 11:59
I'm intrigued. What type of fabric do they use in the construction? It looks somewhat like the same padded material one might use for automobile headliner. I'm a seamstress as well, so I'm finding this quite interesting.

The main bag is out of neoprene--the same stuff used in wetsuits. It stretches some to accomodate most lenses, but there's a definite point beyond which it will not go. The covers range from silk to heavy upholstery fabrics--I'd bet they're all dry clean only. :)

My husband (of all people) is the sewing fanatic in the family--he's mostly a costumer. When we first saw the pictures of the shootsac, his immediate response was, "Oh, that's easy, I'll make you one." I'm glad he didn't--the construction is definitely more complicated than it appears, and it's very solidly made. However, I think it's highly likely I'll have him make a batch of other covers for me as there are a number of fabrics I love that aren't carried (yet!).

liza
23rd of June 2007 (Sat), 12:15
The main bag is out of neoprene--the same stuff used in wetsuits. It stretches some to accomodate most lenses, but there's a definite point beyond which it will not go. The covers range from silk to heavy upholstery fabrics--I'd bet they're all dry clean only. :)

My husband (of all people) is the sewing fanatic in the family--he's mostly a costumer. When we first saw the pictures of the shootsac, his immediate response was, "Oh, that's easy, I'll make you one." I'm glad he didn't--the construction is definitely more complicated than it appears, and it's very solidly made. However, I think it's highly likely I'll have him make a batch of other covers for me as there are a number of fabrics I love that aren't carried (yet!).

They really don't look that complicated. I'm an experienced seamstress, so I may have to design something similar for my own personal needs.

Now I'm inspired! :D

Tish
23rd of June 2007 (Sat), 12:39
If you're going to do it, decide what you want to carry it in first. That's the one huge advantage to designing your own!

I think I'd vary the size of the pockets if I were starting from scratch, as they're pretty evenly sized, which makes sense when you're designing a universal bag. And I'd make one a tiny bit bigger--my 20D (minus lens) won't fit if the Opteka grip is installed, though a 5D with the Canon grip will. My guess there is that the Opteka is just a hair larger than the Canon one.

I'd probably also change the pockets in the back to two instead of three, just personal preference. And I'd potentially make the strap convertable to carry as a waist pack. Hmmm....now you have me thinking about modifying mine. ;)

Do show us what you come up with, Liza, can't wait to see!

tlc
29th of June 2007 (Fri), 10:35
these are beautiful, i love mine. talk about handy! i no longer shooot with two cameras! i got the 'jessica claire' cover and i plan on getting a few more. but these are pricey! are they worth it, in the long run i think so - there arent many 'lens' bags out there.

MrsOpie
29th of June 2007 (Fri), 13:10
I want one but I just shelled out $130 for a Crumpler 7 Million Dollar Home.

tlc
29th of June 2007 (Fri), 16:04
I want one but I just shelled out $130 for a Crumpler 7 Million Dollar Home.

one thing to remember is that these are not 'camera' bags. they are to be worn while your shooting, for quick lens change out. the lens compartments are open so you can slip them in and out quickly. thre are other compartments as well for cards and flash, etc. i find crumplers really bulky - shootsac sort of hugs your body and is soft and cushy.

tigerotor77w
9th of January 2009 (Fri), 15:15
I'll try this old thread before creating my own... so a few questions.

1) You had mentioned, tish, that the ShootSac can hold a 5D (gripped) -- does this mean that if I have a 70-200 f4 IS, 17-55 f2.8, and a 50/1.8 that the bag can still accommodate my XSi (unmounted)? Or would I have to leave out one of the two bigger lenses?

2) Is there a comparable bag that doesn't carry the same enormous price tag? I was thinking Crumpler 6MDH, but that seems to be quite a bit bigger than this. Domke F-8, perhaps, but it, too, looks a fair bit bigger.

Ryan W
9th of January 2009 (Fri), 15:46
Training with JC?! I LOVE her :) Was it amazing?

leninglass
27th of January 2009 (Tue), 23:40
Thank you for this review =) It finally convinced me to buy one. I desperately need a lens bag.

*ordered

bnlearle
28th of January 2009 (Wed), 19:34
I LOVE my shootsac. I actually use it more than I thought for traveling. No longer have to lug around my huge photo bag (that I have to have with me) - now just my 5D, 24L, 50L and 135L in a really portable sac. I really like mine a lot ;)

Bobby

Peacefield
29th of January 2009 (Thu), 08:23
I looked hard at these, but they don't work for me. I go with three bodies, partly as backup, partly so I never have to deal with a lens change. One has a 10-20, another the 24-70, and the third the 70-200. Right now I'm using the ApeCase 1400 (really like it, though it's not perfect) plus a Lowepro mid-sized back pack. It all works pretty good, but I think I'll have to step up to something like a rolling Pelican if I ever want to get to just one case.

mimadee
8th of August 2009 (Sat), 18:55
Do you think that this bag would fit two bodies, or no?

GMCPhotographics
12th of October 2009 (Mon), 15:33
Does anyone know of a UK stockist of the shootsac bags?

Billo78
14th of October 2009 (Wed), 07:19
I've not seen one Gareth, I'd be very interested in picking up one of these myself but I couldn't find how to get one over here when I did a moderately comprehensive online search about a month ago. I love the concept and reckon it would be perfect for shooting weddings.