FJC
2nd of June 2004 (Wed), 12:34
I've recently become a RAW convert, and I've tried C1 Rebel (now discontinued). I like the job it does, but overall I find it a bit cumbersome (the file directory stuff is very awkward). I'm basically going through C1 to get my exposure/WB/crop done, developing the pics, then going into PS Elements 2.0 to do any editing, sharpening, and such.
I'm wondering, though, if rather than spend the $99 or so to get the full C1 LE version, if I'd be better off springing the extra money to just get the full Photoshop CS, and use it's RAW converter.
So, my questions...
1) How is the RAW conversion in PS CS? As good as C1, or better?
2) How's the workflow this way? Is it slow for culling out the obvious bad pictures (do you use a different program for that)?
3) How much has Adobe generally charged for photoshop upgrades in the past?
Thanks all, for helping out a newbie as I figure out what's the best workflow for me. :)
I'm wondering, though, if rather than spend the $99 or so to get the full C1 LE version, if I'd be better off springing the extra money to just get the full Photoshop CS, and use it's RAW converter.
So, my questions...
1) How is the RAW conversion in PS CS? As good as C1, or better?
2) How's the workflow this way? Is it slow for culling out the obvious bad pictures (do you use a different program for that)?
3) How much has Adobe generally charged for photoshop upgrades in the past?
Thanks all, for helping out a newbie as I figure out what's the best workflow for me. :)