Pete
10th of July 2007 (Tue), 07:09
I took a couple of shots of this little wasp, with and without the ring-flash.
With flash
http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/IMG_4093.jpg
With flash (WB decreased by 1000K)
http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/IMG_4093_WB.jpg
Natural light
http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/IMG_4095.jpg
You can see here that the flash gives a fairly un-natural yellowish cast to the leaf and the wasp itself has sort of washed out colours. You also see the far darker background, which sometimes can be a good thing. You can also see how the flash has frozen the motion of the waving antennae.
On the other side of the foot, using the flash makes the photography that much easier and also gives a nice shadow for the legs.
My verdict? I'll still keep using the ring-flash, but I'm aware of the changes from the natural lighting.
With flash
http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/IMG_4093.jpg
With flash (WB decreased by 1000K)
http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/IMG_4093_WB.jpg
Natural light
http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/IMG_4095.jpg
You can see here that the flash gives a fairly un-natural yellowish cast to the leaf and the wasp itself has sort of washed out colours. You also see the far darker background, which sometimes can be a good thing. You can also see how the flash has frozen the motion of the waving antennae.
On the other side of the foot, using the flash makes the photography that much easier and also gives a nice shadow for the legs.
My verdict? I'll still keep using the ring-flash, but I'm aware of the changes from the natural lighting.