View Full Version : what is the....
c0ntr0lz
11th of June 2004 (Fri), 00:45
extra zoom a digital camera adds to a lens?
Jesper
11th of June 2004 (Fri), 01:08
What do you mean? The focal length multiplier factor? Have a look here: Understanding the DSLR Magnification Factor (http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/understanding-series/dslr-mag.shtml).
"Focal length multplier" is a wrong name for this effect. The effect is caused by the fact that sensors of most digital cameras are smaller than a standard 35mm film image (which is 24 x 36 mm). The sensor doesn't record the full 24 x 36mm image, but only the middle part (for example, the sensor of the Digital Rebel and 10D is 15.1 x 22.7mm). The 1.6 factor is really a crop factor, not a focal length multplier.
EXA1a
11th of June 2004 (Fri), 02:00
extra zoom a digital camera adds to a lens?
The so-called "digital zoom" doesn't add anything to the lens. It only makes up pixels. It's like enlarging a picture to several 100% with photoshop and smoothening the edges.
--Jens--
Skipper
11th of June 2004 (Fri), 06:28
Did I ever get garbage for information from Ritz Camera!
Kinda like joining the service, all the good information you get at the recruiting office.
Oh well I am learing.
Cadwell
11th of June 2004 (Fri), 06:47
The so-called "digital zoom" doesn't add anything to the lens. It only makes up pixels. It's like enlarging a picture to several 100% with photoshop and smoothening the edges.
--Jens--
:lol: Yeah, I've got a digital video camera which claims "500x digital zoom" on top of it's 20x optical. The digital zoom is hillarious. You end up with a couple of really BIG pixels on your screen and that's about it :lol:
robertwgross
11th of June 2004 (Fri), 12:19
There used to be huge arguments about whether it was a focal length magnifier, or a field of view factor, or a cropping factor. It went on and on. It is much easier to simply call it the 1.6 factor and leave it at that.
---Bob Gross---
c0ntr0lz
11th of June 2004 (Fri), 20:58
thanks guys that's what i was looking for
CyberDyneSystems
11th of June 2004 (Fri), 21:03
There used to be huge arguments about whether it was a focal length magnifier, or a field of view factor, or a cropping factor.....
---Bob Gross---
Used to be??? :x
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:wink:
robertwgross
13th of June 2004 (Sun), 22:59
There used to be huge arguments about whether it was a focal length magnifier, or a field of view factor, or a cropping factor.....
---Bob Gross---
Used to be???
Yes, as in past tense. History.
A lot of people cannot think about it in terms of a cropping factor or a field of view factor. But if you tell that that it "sorta makes your 100mm lens act like a 160mm lens", then they understand that, even though that is a gross simplification.
---Bob Gross---
CyberDyneSystems
14th of June 2004 (Mon), 16:57
lol,.. I'm going to remember that term...
When we need to soften the complexity of an issue.. we will call the resulting explanation a "Gross Simplification" t.m.
Excellent! :)
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.