PDA

View Full Version : Chicago - Fire Escape


daves-not-here
14th of July 2007 (Sat), 08:52
Cross-posted by request from Kenyc (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost.php?p=3542737&postcount=3)

I took this a year ago on a trip to Chicago. Unfortunately, I was walking with two people who didn't have an interest in photography, so everything I shot was quite hurried.

Nevertheless, I like this shot, and I'd like some C&C if there is any to be heard.

http://www.daves-not-here.net/images/chicago/2006_03_01_chicago_fire_escape.jpg

Jim G
14th of July 2007 (Sat), 09:05
Can't see a photo!

daves-not-here
14th of July 2007 (Sat), 09:10
It loads fine for me. Try waiting a bit longer. If I compressed any more I was getting a lot of artifact distortion.

whereismykit
14th of July 2007 (Sat), 19:42
I like this.

3Honu
15th of July 2007 (Sun), 02:04
I like this too. Really neat perspective

bobinatcat
15th of July 2007 (Sun), 02:05
i have no photo to view either, and it says done in the bottom left.

according to jim
15th of July 2007 (Sun), 09:39
I like it!

grimreaper
15th of July 2007 (Sun), 14:49
good this , great exposure , what was your metering mode?

Ron Currie
15th of July 2007 (Sun), 16:15
Wow, great shot, neat perspective. Just goes to show, keep your head on a swivel, there are good pictures in unexpected places.

shaunknee
15th of July 2007 (Sun), 19:04
Great shot - perfect exposure

wesuggs
15th of July 2007 (Sun), 19:04
neat perspective

daves-not-here
21st of July 2007 (Sat), 08:03
good this , great exposure , what was your metering mode?It's been a while, but I think it might have been evaluative.

daves-not-here
21st of July 2007 (Sat), 08:04
Thanks everyone for all the positive feedback.

kenyc
23rd of July 2007 (Mon), 06:16
Cool!I still love it. :)

KAC

TByrne
23rd of July 2007 (Mon), 14:37
Form is supposed to follow function. And when it doesn't. When the buidling's designers are so wrapped tight in their vision of "art" over purpose... we wind up with... well it's as if the building has acne. Its facade has broken out in defacing metalic zit-works. It's not the fault of the regulators, rather it's the responsibility of the architects ... or their irresponsibility which resulted in all of the lovely stonework... all of that craftsmanship defiled the way a pimple despoils the face of a model.

Thanks for sharing...

Ted

adam LC
23rd of July 2007 (Mon), 18:38
Form is supposed to follow function. And when it doesn't. When the buidling's designers are so wrapped tight in their vision of "art" over purpose... we wind up with... well it's as if the building has acne. Its facade has broken out in defacing metalic zit-works. It's not the fault of the regulators, rather it's the responsibility of the architects ... or their irresponsibility which resulted in all of the lovely stonework... all of that craftsmanship defiled the way a pimple despoils the face of a model.

Thanks for sharing...

Ted
I really don't get this???

Love the photo though!

kenyc
23rd of July 2007 (Mon), 19:27
I really don't get this???

Love the photo though!


I don't think you're alone. :)

KAC

mattyp
23rd of July 2007 (Mon), 20:01
love the perspective.

fotohound
24th of July 2007 (Tue), 00:11
I'd like to see this shot in bright sunlight with shadows creating a counter pattern.