300D C1 profiles comparison

[Guillermo Freige]

This is a comparison between the ETC profile, the standard 300D C1 profile (in C1 v1.3, previous C1REBEL V1 has a different one) and the standard Canon libraries result (using BreezeBrowser, but FVU results are the same) as a reference. All images were converted using no corrections during conversion and resized inside the converter to 600x400. All images are in sRGB.

I'm posting them as links as Pekka new resize feature kills my bandwidth!!!!

Picture 1:

Canon libraries:
http://gfreige.homelinux.org/CRW_4688.jpg

C1 using included 300D profile:
http://gfreige.homelinux.org/CRW_4688-C1std.jpg

C1 using ETC HiSat profile:
http://gfreige.homelinux.org/CRW_4688-C1ETC.jpg

Picture 2:

Canon libraries:
http://gfreige.homelinux.org/CRW_6308.jpg

C1 using included 300D profile:
http://gfreige.homelinux.org/CRW_6308-C1std.jpg

C1 using ETC HiSat profile:
http://gfreige.homelinux.org/CRW_6308-C1ETC.jpg

Picture 3:

Canon libraries:
http://gfreige.homelinux.org/CRW_6319.jpg

C1 using included 300D profile:
http://gfreige.homelinux.org/CRW_6319-C1std.jpg

C1 using ETC HiSat profile (the more accurate representation of the flower colors):
http://gfreige.homelinux.org/CRW_6319-C1ETC.jpg

[ohenry]

It's difficult to grasp any differences (I guess I could download all then compare them side by side). What is your take on the differences?

[drisley]

The Hi Sat profile looks alot like the regular canon libraries.
I've been trying, and liking, the new 300D-sunset profile included with the latest C1 3.5.

[slejhamer]

I've been trying, and liking, the new 300D-sunset profile included with the latest C1 3.5.

Dris, try a little experiment: switch between the 10D sunset, 300D sunset, D30 sunset, and D60 sunset profiles. See if you notice any difference. Any at all ... :shock:

[drisley]

No, actually they all appear the same..... :?