EOS Man
28th of July 2007 (Sat), 00:48
I thought CF cards were suppose to be priced lower than SD cards of the equivalent capacity. But now SanDisk lists their Ultra II and Extreme III cards $5-10 lower for SDs versus CF.
I understand that cameras using SDs are swarming out by the dozens versus few SLRs and prosumers using CF. However, shouldn't the cheaper to produce/higher capacity of the CF contra off the large demand=lower price of the SD?
I understand that cameras using SDs are swarming out by the dozens versus few SLRs and prosumers using CF. However, shouldn't the cheaper to produce/higher capacity of the CF contra off the large demand=lower price of the SD?