Cadenza
30th of July 2004 (Fri), 08:03
Ok, so I finally started shooting in RAW in earnest,
and so far I'm enjoying it a lot! It takes a bit more
time in post processing, but boy, sometimes you
feel like GOD with the amount of control it gives
you over some images.
Once you work out the settings, exposure, white
balance etc. you want from the RAW file, you can
save it as a jpeg or the lossless tiff format. If you're
not going planning to mess with the image again, is
there any advantage in printing from a tiff file, as
opposed to a low compression jpeg file? I can't
tell the difference in my six-color Epson 1280, but
was wondering if it makes a difference in other more
advanced printers.
TIFF, of course, takes a lot of space and processing
power, and since I have the RAW file archived, I see
no reason to save processed image in TIFF, unless
it offered substantial benefit in the quality of printed
output. I've searched the net and googled, but the
information I found is a bit ambiguous. Does anyone
have any thoughts on this?
TIA, Cadenza
and so far I'm enjoying it a lot! It takes a bit more
time in post processing, but boy, sometimes you
feel like GOD with the amount of control it gives
you over some images.
Once you work out the settings, exposure, white
balance etc. you want from the RAW file, you can
save it as a jpeg or the lossless tiff format. If you're
not going planning to mess with the image again, is
there any advantage in printing from a tiff file, as
opposed to a low compression jpeg file? I can't
tell the difference in my six-color Epson 1280, but
was wondering if it makes a difference in other more
advanced printers.
TIFF, of course, takes a lot of space and processing
power, and since I have the RAW file archived, I see
no reason to save processed image in TIFF, unless
it offered substantial benefit in the quality of printed
output. I've searched the net and googled, but the
information I found is a bit ambiguous. Does anyone
have any thoughts on this?
TIA, Cadenza