View Full Version : E-session 10-14-07
LeesaB
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 22:14
Allyson and Dustin, very cute couple
LeesaB
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 22:15
two more
LeesaB
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 22:16
and two more
bcap
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 22:23
Hey Lees!
1. Interesting angle. It sort of makes me dizzy though.
2. I like this one a lot. But, like I said in the chat thread, I am a sucker for flare.
3. Not bad, looks OOF though.
4. Very nice shot. I like it. Looks a little underexposed though.
5. Nice. I don't like the angle though, I would have probably gotten more on top of them. I don't like the PP either, it's very unflatering to her skin and her hair looks like a really weird color.
6. OOF.
kja
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 22:25
Lisa - nice job :)
I really like the one with them holding hands (numbers please!) and walking away.
I also love the one of them on the grass with him kissing her, though the PP isn't my favourite ever.
On my screen the skin looks too saturated/red/orange on the last shot by the fence, otherwise a nice shot (wish he had his hand on her hip or something, but that's him).
Kathy H
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 22:36
I like them a lot!
I think you did a great job!
Cujo_34
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 22:38
I really like #2 with the blue but thinking if they share their engagement photo with others for whatever reasons that #4 fits the purpose pretty good -- great invitation type pictures I think.
MrsOpie
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 22:40
I like #4 and #5. I would have liked #1 if the crop wasn't as tight and if the flash wasn't as harsh.
drogos
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 22:41
pretty much what bcap said and i have to add one more thing:
#2 what's the point of silhoute picture if they look into camera ...you know that they look at you but you can't see the faces .... i would love to see it with them looking at each other
LeesaB
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 22:47
Hey Lees!
1. Interesting angle. It sort of makes me dizzy though.
2. I like this one a lot. But, like I said in the chat thread, I am a sucker for flare.
3. Not bad, looks OOF though.
4. Very nice shot. I like it. Looks a little underexposed though.
5. Nice. I don't like the angle though, I would have probably gotten more on top of them. I don't like the PP either, it's very unflatering to her skin and her hair looks like a really weird color.
6. OOF.
Thanks Bryan, you know I appreciate your CC. I still have work to do, but I'm learning!
Lisa - nice job :)
I really like the one with them holding hands (numbers please!) and walking away.
I also love the one of them on the grass with him kissing her, though the PP isn't my favourite ever.
On my screen the skin looks too saturated/red/orange on the last shot by the fence, otherwise a nice shot (wish he had his hand on her hip or something, but that's him).
yes, I do agree, it did show up on here really red/orange, I can change that, I'm not so sure it's OOF, but just not adjusted correctly.
I like them a lot!
I think you did a great job!
Thank you Kathy!:D
I really like #2 with the blue but thinking if they share their engagement photo with others for whatever reasons that #4 fits the purpose pretty good -- great invitation type pictures I think.
Thank you! :D
I like #4 and #5. I would have liked #1 if the crop wasn't as tight and if the flash wasn't as harsh.
Thanks Mrs. Opie, Do you think it's the flash or just my adjustments on the BW?
pretty much what bcap said and i have to add one more thing:
#2 what's the point of silhoute picture if they look into camera ...you know that they look at you but you can't see the faces .... i would love to see it with them looking at each other
Very true, It was not planned, so it just kinda happened as they sat their, I will remember that for sure next time!
jessiper
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 22:56
You're trying new things, and that's great! I can't comment on the editing because I'm on my laptop...#4 & 5 are good, and #2 is interesting! Keep working at it, you're getting better!
LeesaB
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 23:14
Thanks Jess, I've been trying to watch the threads and pay attention to what others are doing...learn from what they do, practice on images I've had here, and keep learnng..
notapro
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 23:35
Lisa, I think these are great! Same thoughts as Bryan & drogos, except that #1 doesn't make me dizzy. I love that pose and angle. 1 and 4 are my favourites.
LeesaB
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 23:40
Thanks Amanda..
It proves there is hope for anyone out there trying, LOL.
cccp145
15th of October 2007 (Mon), 23:59
NIce job
JJacula
16th of October 2007 (Tue), 00:01
#1, very unique angle, really shows off his eyes.
#2, wow, that flare is blinding! Cool experiment ... wish her sweater wasn't white!
#3, cute, but the focus fell on their sweaters rather than on their faces.
#4, LOVE it!
#5, really like it!
#6, they look OOF, looks like focus fell on the gate/sidewalk - but might be compression issues.
restech
16th of October 2007 (Tue), 01:07
Agree on drogos' comment on the silhoutte picture.
Also the others' comment on the oof.
I don't like # 6, not only because of oof, but the composition also is not pop.
I like # 1, it's a really different angle. Like it.
Toogy
16th of October 2007 (Tue), 07:12
Lisa, I think you've shown great improvement with this series, I pretty much agree with what everyone else is saying for the CC, so there is no point repeating it. Good Job overall!!
LeesaB
16th of October 2007 (Tue), 08:58
Thank you Sir Jeff!
LeesaB
16th of October 2007 (Tue), 09:02
#1, very unique angle, really shows off his eyes.
#2, wow, that flare is blinding! Cool experiment ... wish her sweater wasn't white!
#3, cute, but the focus fell on their sweaters rather than on their faces.
#4, LOVE it!
#5, really like it!
#6, they look OOF, looks like focus fell on the gate/sidewalk - but might be compression issues.
thanks Jenn...I appreciate the Feedback
Agree on drogos' comment on the silhoutte picture.
Also the others' comment on the oof.
I don't like # 6, not only because of oof, but the composition also is not pop.
I like # 1, it's a really different angle. Like it.
Thank you, and yes, I am tending to agree on that image
arch1tect
16th of October 2007 (Tue), 09:11
Good Job Lisa, I agree with all the CC as well.
LeesaB
16th of October 2007 (Tue), 09:14
Thanks Michael!:D
sblais
16th of October 2007 (Tue), 09:20
#2 reminds me of the movie Platoon, for some reason!
Great job in general!
In #3, I wish the hand would take more of the frame than that. I see what you are trying to do, but I find it's not quite there yet.
LeesaB
16th of October 2007 (Tue), 09:24
#2 reminds me of the movie Platoon, for some reason!
Great job in general!
In #3, I wish the hand would take more of the frame than that. I see what you are trying to do, but I find it's not quite there yet.
Thanks Seb, now I have to watch another movie, LOL Platoon?
Thanks for the C&C I appreciate it.
sblais
16th of October 2007 (Tue), 09:26
Oups, I actually meant the movie Cocoon, not Platoon... Here's the poster that your picture reminds me of:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Cocoonposter.jpg
LeesaB
16th of October 2007 (Tue), 09:29
OOO now, I can see how that does...interesting.
gheesom
16th of October 2007 (Tue), 09:30
I like these, still work needs to be done...esp on the OOF ones, they look very relaxed with you ahooting them
LeesaB
16th of October 2007 (Tue), 09:34
Thanks Gareth,
OOO I have few that went right to the delete can, so stiff, and she even said, "this is so hard with people watching you" LOL..but they did finally warm up. they were a fun couple
david888lee
16th of October 2007 (Tue), 23:20
good composition
i just had an interesting idea haha. what if for the third picture (the one with the groom putting his hand in front of the camera), you focused on the hand, and the groom and bridge were blurry.
LeesaB
17th of October 2007 (Wed), 11:37
Interesting idea, but I think the subject would be the hand then..not the couple...but generally, that's how mine come out. This one I purposed (cuz I saw it somewhere else) to do it that way,
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.