PDA

View Full Version : National Geographic Small Backpack Review


jjasc
25th of October 2007 (Thu), 14:18
I have the small NG packpack and figured I would write a review of it for people trying to decide between the small, medium, and large NG backpacks. I've seen a review of the medium backpack here, but no one seems to say anything about the small...until now :)

I've had this packpack for about 4 months now. I recently used it on a three week tour of China. I took it on 7 planes, several trains,and countless taxies. Everytime I stepped out of my hotel, I wore it. I wore it hiking up grueling mountains, hiking down mountains, during storms, lighting, rain and sweltering 100 degree temperatures with 100% humidity.


On my trip I carried a 3lbs CF tripod & Ballhead setup (Feisol 3441 tripod + Acratech Ultimate Ballhead), a Sigma 17-70mm, Canon 10-22mm, Canon 50 mm 1.8, a Lee Wideangle Filter Hood + 3 filters in a filter pouch, a rocket blower and full cleaning kit. I also had a filter wallter for my polarizer, uv filters and step up adapters. Also had other accesseries (memory, cable release, batteries, etc).

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff45/jjasc/IMG_4461-1.jpg

The Review

This is a fairly small backpack. About a foot wide and a foot and a half tall (maybe a little bit more). It's very travelish sized.

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff45/jjasc/IMG_4463-2.jpg
Very compact. Not very tall. The bag is quite "deep" (thick) though.


Spacewise, you can pack quite a lot into this bag. In the lens/body compartment, I squeezed in the three lenses (one lens was on the body, which left enough room two store the other two lenses).


http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff45/jjasc/IMG_4475-10.jpg
The lens & body compartment



If you want to bring a telephoto like the 70-200mm though, you may have some space issues. No way will that fit on the camera in the pouch. You could store it, but you could only fit the camera body and the 70-200 (which would not be attached to the body). So for wide angles, primes, and medium telephotos like the 24-105, you will have no problem, but anything bigger than a 24-105 might cause problems.

The tripod strappings can be placed either vertically below the tripod or horizontally along the side. I prefere the horizontal method, as you don't bang the tripod into people or things -- this was especially an issue I found in crowded China. You do have to watch how you turn though. I turned suddenly when in China and clocked this poor girl in the face with my ballhead. The vertical method distributes the load better however -- I would switch the tripod to vertical position when hiking up mountains.


http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff45/jjasc/IMG_4480-14.jpg
Horizontal Position for the tripod. My favorite position. Well balance, but watch when you turn!!

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff45/jjasc/IMG_4483-15.jpg
Verticle Tripod position. The most comfortable for mountain hikes, but watch you don't hit things with the tripod!

I have to say this backpack looks and feels high quality. The material is firm and very tightly stiched, and the hemp is very very strong. I abused the hell out of my backpack during my travels and the backpack help up just fine.

The top compartment is sealed off from the bottom, which gives you enough room to store a light jacket and a few other small things. I used it to store my massive Lee Wide Angle filter hood and Lee filter wallet (see picture). I also crammed a few other accessories in there. Can you fit a laptop in there? If it's a 13 inch or less laptop, yes. I took a picture with a package of paper fitted into the slot. If you laptop is the same dimensions as that package of paper, you should be able to carry the laptop.

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff45/jjasc/IMG_4471-7.jpg
I put a whole pack of regular lined school paper here (the kind you buy to put in folders. So if you want to know if your computer will fit, compare the dimensions (especially width) to a pack of paper.

The backpack also features more pockets than you can shake a stick at. I found these very useful. In some pockets I kept my cleaning supplies, in other pockets, my filter wallets, and still others, my battery and memory.

You also get a little rain hood (which comes in a pouch). You can pull the rain hood over the backpack in a pinch.

The backpack is pretty comfortable. You can adjust various straps the keep it more tight around your body. This model doesn't come with a belt feature though. It does have a strap to tighten around the chest area however. I found the backpack a bit tiring after carrying it around ALL day, especially since it was fully loaded and had a tripod strapped on the side. I got used to it after a while though. When I did take out some of my gear (and remove the tripod), the pack got noticibly comfortable. So I have to say it's quite comfortable if you don't stuff it to the brim with stuff. If you are only bringing your camera and a couple lenses, a few accessories, and maybe a light coat, it should hold up good. Add a tripod and it's still ok. But stuff it full and you may find it uncomforable.

It is a bit of a pain accessing the camera once you have it stowed inside (camera + lens + 2 other lenses = tight fit), but this is a problem all backpacks share. I have been thinking about getting a ThinkTank 360, as it might get around this problem.

The hemp material is very strong and keeps your stuff dry. If it get's wet though, it can take a while to fully dry (even though the stuff inside will still be dry). I used mine in very humid temperatures and I found the backpack would feel a bit moist on the surface. I have to note that I was also sweating profusely, which also contributed to this. Didn't effect the inside though.

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff45/jjasc/IMG_4488-18.jpg
Very comfortable, when not too full. I have all my gear in here, minus my camera and 24-105 lens which the picture was taken with.


Summary
If you don't plan on carrying a backup body and more than two (besides the lens on the camera) lenses, this bag will suite you fine. If you do want a telephoto lens, well you can easily store it in the top section of the bag, though you will need to have it stored in a pouch.

If you want a backpack much more portable than the medium explorer, but built with the same outstanding quality, then get the small backpack. It's a fantastic travel/hiking backpack.

Would I get this over the Medium backpack? Yes, because this backpack is much smaller and far more travel and hiking worthy. The cost you pay is in storage, however.


Hope this helps.

jjasc
25th of October 2007 (Thu), 14:22
A few more pictures

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff45/jjasc/IMG_4484-16.jpg
View of the back end.

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff45/jjasc/IMG_4476-11.jpg
Pockets galore.

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff45/jjasc/IMG_4474-9.jpg
A container for a water bottle. Very useful!!

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff45/jjasc/IMG_4479-13.jpg
Top compartment full of stuff

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff45/jjasc/IMG_4473-8.jpg
More pockets!

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff45/jjasc/IMG_4467-6.jpg

http://i239.photobucket.com/albums/ff45/jjasc/IMG_4487-17.jpg
View of the side

RX350
25th of October 2007 (Thu), 20:57
Thank you for review , how well it works in the rain ?

jjasc
25th of October 2007 (Thu), 22:54
It works fine in the rain, if you carry the small rain pouch that comes with the bag. You can pull the rain guard over the packpack and it's then rain poof. I wouldn't want to let the rain pour on the backpack too long without the rain guard, however.

I could be wrong, but I don't think the Medium NG backpack comes with a rain pouch. I believe the Large NG backpack does.

Banana Tiger
28th of October 2007 (Sun), 13:16
I've had this packpack for about 4 months now. I recently used it on a three week tour of China. I took it on 7 planes, several trains,and countless taxies. Everytime I stepped out of my hotel, I wore it. I wore it hiking up grueling mountains, hiking down mountains, during storms, lighting, rain and sweltering 100 degree temperatures with 100% humidity.

Thanks for the review jjasc. I'd be interested to know when you used the bag in rainy and stormy conditions, whether that was with or without the rain pouch.

Far2Close
29th of October 2007 (Mon), 01:10
Awesome review, totally sold me on that bag :) I've been looking for a small cam bag, didn't want the usual camera bags short small blobs.

How much will they run me?

ace3
29th of October 2007 (Mon), 14:28
nice! I was hoping someone would buy the small bag & take pics of it.

Here's my review of the Adorama Medium Safari backpack ... same thing as the NG bag, just cheaper.

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=394054

they're great bags!

jjasc
29th of October 2007 (Mon), 23:02
I never actually did use the rain pouch. There was one time in China when I wish I had brough it with me, as it went from semi cloudy to complete monsoon in twenty minutes. My bag got a bit wet, but I was able to get out of the water.

The bag can absorb a bit of water. If it drizzles, you should be ok. With material like hemp, however, I wouldn't want to be out in the poring rain without a rainpouch. As long as you bring the small rainpouch (it folds up into a small little pouch that you can tuck inside your back), rain shouldn't be an issue.

I bought mine (new) from ebay for about 100 bucks USD. I think retail it might be around $120?

The quality of this bag is really high though. I can't stress how impressed I am with the quality of it. If you like the look of the medium NG backpack but want something for travel, then the small NG is exactly what you need.

Far2Close
13th of January 2008 (Sun), 20:47
JJASC sold me on this bag a while ago :) I picked it up, and am very happy with it.
Its perfect for quick day hikes. At first I didn't like its bulkiness, but it has to be with the padding, and every time I use it, I'm more and more happy with it.

One awesome feature that JJASC didn't mention is that you can remove the dividers from the camera compartment and unzip a wall that seperates the top half backpack, with the bottom camera compartment. Meaning it becomes a full regular backpack if needed.

Like JJASC has mentioned before, the build quality is the best. I've never owned a sturdier backpack. Easily worth $100-120.

Gustavo_bl
31st of March 2009 (Tue), 19:01
Does this bag fits a canon 30D with a 24-105 lens attached?

brecklundin
31st of March 2009 (Tue), 22:19
Excellent review of the small bag. THANKS!! :D I have been considering a small version simply because some days I only want to tote around a few bits of gear. I was just worried it would be too small. But your review shows me it might just do the trick. I will take a closer look at the medium bag though.

I have the Large version of this pack and love it. One thing I recommend to anyone who gets one of these, grab a product called Nikwax to waterproof the outside material. It will work wonders to keep moisture and the occasional splash of water from getting the hemp wet. As mentioned the insides stay dry due to a waterproof barrier liner. But the Nikwax also helps exterior pocket contents.

An added bonus of the Nikwax is it's sort of like a very durable Scotchgard for natural fiber material so it helps keep the exterior clean and also lets you wash it off should the need arise. Plus Nikwax products are themselves natural compounds not synthetics.

BTW, non of the NG bags are NOT really "rain proof" unless inside their "personal" rain suit. ;) also not all of the compartments have zippers so you do want to consider what you put in them. Yet, I have found with mine nothing ever gets wet or even damp inside. My main concern is dust in the unzipped compartments that just use a flap and a snap.

Best of all is the hemp is a great almost indestructible fiber (the original Levi jeans were hemp). So it breathes very well and will actually cool you down the more you perspire because the hemp (as well as some cotton weaves) provides evaporative cooling. Few synthetivcs offer this bonus. It all works to make a very nice bag.

One day when I have time I'll add a review on how I use the large version. but I carry a tripod, monopod AND one of those tri-leg folding stools if I am unsure of what I will need once I get to where I am going. I would say the construction quality of these bags rivals the Tom Bihn bags I love so much and use for pretty much everything else.

EDIT: I just found not only are there a LOT more products in the Natty-G Explorer line but that Amazon has some great prices right now. For example the Small bag is about $84 and the medium is $114 with free shipping. What caught my eye was the other "accessories", I mean we gots to be able to add more things to dangle from the bags or our body so we look really insane!! hehehehe....

http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&search-alias=photo&field-brandtextbin=National%20Geographic