PDA

View Full Version : Looking for a everyday shoulder bag


dahl
29th of October 2007 (Mon), 04:37
I have been looking at "all" the bag threads for hours and my head's spinning.

I plan to buy a large bag shortly to hold "everything", but I also need a new regular shoulder bag for everyday use.

It should be able to hold:
XI with a grip and lens attached, 480 flash and a couple of extra lenses (or at least one).

Maybe something along the line of the 5MDH bag?

Any feedback is welcome :) I have to go to bed...

_aravena
29th of October 2007 (Mon), 08:48
Be more specific. Couple extra lenses doesn't say much. 5MDH could work, just depends. I found the Nova series is bigger than they let on. I have a 3, you can check my review in my sig. Maybe th 2 or 3 would be good for you.

I actually use my homemade bag now all the time. Guess I should sell the 3.

nutsnbolts
29th of October 2007 (Mon), 11:39
Domke F-3x perhaps.

Riff Raff
29th of October 2007 (Mon), 12:38
I'm using the Crumpler 6MDH. Fits XTi+Grip, 24-70 f/2.8L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 85 f/1.8, 430 EX, plus a few accessories.

Jon
29th of October 2007 (Mon), 12:44
Domke F-3x perhaps.That would also be my thought. That or the F-803 Camera Satchel.

In2Photos
29th of October 2007 (Mon), 13:03
The Domke F-2 would also work well.

Bosman
29th of October 2007 (Mon), 13:08
Domke F-3x

Bootsie
29th of October 2007 (Mon), 14:19
I love my 5MDH, I don't like to stuff my gear in, so I fit 20D, 430EX, and one of my lenses attached (see sig) and another very small lens like the 50mm 1.8. It is my everyday bag, with my 7MDH as my all gear bag. I love Crumplers, I looked at Domke, but they just didn't fit what I was looking for, and I think Crumplers are much better looking.

dahl
30th of October 2007 (Tue), 04:17
Thank you for all the replies.
I think I'll vsit my local Samy's and try some of these models out.

meglet
30th of October 2007 (Tue), 14:19
I have a Crumpler 5MDH with an XTi (no grip) with kit lens attached, 75-300mm lens, and space for an external flash or 50mm f1.8 currently. I normally carry the 50mm in a LowePro 1W attached to the outside of the bag to leave space for my keys, cell phone, etc inside the case. If you have a grip attached and more lenses than this, I would suggest starting with a 6MDH, I will be upgrading to one with my next lens purchase.

eelnoraa
30th of October 2007 (Tue), 19:10
[quote=dahl;4210109]XI with a grip and lens attached, 480 flash and a couple of extra lenses (or at least one).

Maybe something along the line of the 5MDH bag?
quote]

Can you be more specific about what is the attached lens? How many extra lens will you bring along and what they are? Because if you are looking at 5MDH, these are important questions.

The 5MDH is a rather short bag, the longest lens you want to attached to XTi and still fit is probably 24-105L or 17-55IS (Even this one is a little stretch). If you put the flash on one side, then you can only fit another small lens on the other side. Small kens here means 50f1.8/f.14, 85f1.8, kit lens size.

I used to like Crumper quite alot, but after using them for a while, I found some flaws with 5 & 6 MDH:

1) very little space for other personal things, such as key, cell phone, paper, tickets ... unless you want to put them into the camera compartment.

2) Even if you just want to retreive some personal things in the front pocket, you need to open the flap and expose camera equipment. Older Crumpler has additional flap covering the camera compartment, but these two newer model do have it.

3) Handstrap sew on flap, so you need to make sure the flap is fully secured with the buckle before using the handstrap. My lowepro strealth reportor 300's hand strap is attached to the D-ring on the side, so I can put it up and go even the flap is not close at all.

4) At least for 6 MDH, it is actaully not very pratically use the space. My SR 300 is physically the same size as 6 MDH, but I can fit more in it.

5) the velcro on the flap gets annoying. I much prefer buckle or zipper because they can stay open or close securely.

After all the flaws, Crumpler actually cushion the camera quipment very well and looks very good outside.

eel

BearLeeAlive
30th of October 2007 (Tue), 21:35
I use the Domke J-803. It is tough and holds as much as I would every want to carry in a shoulder bag. I don't like the fuzzy weird colours of the Crumplers, though they seem almost as well made as the Domke line-up.

MGW172
30th of October 2007 (Tue), 22:55
Take a look at the Naneu Pro Lima. It fits everything in my gear signature plus a 420EX flash and it only cost me about $45. It's really well made, has lots of zipper pockets inside and out and doesn't look like a camera bag which I find to be advantageous when walking around in some areas.

http://www.naneupro.com/products/mo-l/

_aravena
30th of October 2007 (Tue), 23:55
[quote=dahl;4210109]XI with a grip and lens attached, 480 flash and a couple of extra lenses (or at least one).

Maybe something along the line of the 5MDH bag?
quote]

Can you be more specific about what is the attached lens? How many extra lens will you bring along and what they are? Because if you are looking at 5MDH, these are important questions.

The 5MDH is a rather short bag, the longest lens you want to attached to XTi and still fit is probably 24-105L or 17-55IS (Even this one is a little stretch). If you put the flash on one side, then you can only fit another small lens on the other side. Small kens here means 50f1.8/f.14, 85f1.8, kit lens size.

I used to like Crumper quite alot, but after using them for a while, I found some flaws with 5 & 6 MDH:

1) very little space for other personal things, such as key, cell phone, paper, tickets ... unless you want to put them into the camera compartment.

2) Even if you just want to retreive some personal things in the front pocket, you need to open the flap and expose camera equipment. Older Crumpler has additional flap covering the camera compartment, but these two newer model do have it.

3) Handstrap sew on flap, so you need to make sure the flap is fully secured with the buckle before using the handstrap. My lowepro strealth reportor 300's hand strap is attached to the D-ring on the side, so I can put it up and go even the flap is not close at all.

4) At least for 6 MDH, it is actaully not very pratically use the space. My SR 300 is physically the same size as 6 MDH, but I can fit more in it.

5) the velcro on the flap gets annoying. I much prefer buckle or zipper because they can stay open or close securely.

After all the flaws, Crumpler actually cushion the camera quipment very well and looks very good outside.

eel

No. You don't know Crumplers well. And seriously, gotta go with Dr. Cox on this one. Why do men carry around this little pouches for cell phones? Perhaps the invention of the pocket was too much for them to carry keys, tickets, etc. Maybe we all should have purses like the ladies.

Sorry, it cracks me up when people mention stuff like this, but do you carry a purse around when your camera bag isn't with you? 'Cause if you don't, where's all that go normally and why can't it go there now?

Aniwho, back to my original statement, the 5MDH is larger than you think but the 6MDH is bigger and taller. Yes, you got to be specific when you ask questions, but you can get more in the 5MDH then he listed. Two small lens atop each other and I speak of 30 F1.4 and 50 F1.8/4 or 85 F1.8 and maybe tubes. I don't own an 85 so I'm not sure of size. Or 70-200 with hood. Check my review on it. Just Click the 7MDH link in my sig, it's in the same thread.

Also, if you need the space, the MDH's have slots on the side to attach pouches like their Thirsty Al's which are get for, "personal things, such as key, cell phone, paper, tickets" if need be. i use mine for camera batteries and a Large Bundle for additional lens or flash or anything really. It hold my 10-20 and 50 real well. I was just checking size.

Keys, cell phone, wallet, and the sort, well if I have cargos on, plenty of room, if not, wallet in back pocket, keys in the other, cell on one side and leaves one open. Go me!

I've been debating psychology all night, please forgive me for my upbeat sarcasm.

http://a771.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/110/l_0d9adbbbf054d2c6b47c4a94bd713452.jpg

The list of my gear in the bag is in the review, but the empty space holds my 20D with handstrap, neckstrap, and 18-50 F2.8 w/ hood attached.

tunin
31st of October 2007 (Wed), 05:29
Anyway you go please go with a CRUMPLER. I got a bunch of cases/bags/backpacks/slings and I was not completely happy until I got my THE DAILY xxl - 750.

nutsnbolts
31st of October 2007 (Wed), 09:53
Anyway you go please go with a CRUMPLER. I got a bunch of cases/bags/backpacks/slings and I was not completely happy until I got my THE DAILY xxl - 750.

Being in the US, I'm still trying to find a Crumpler Daily XXL.

Bootsie
31st of October 2007 (Wed), 10:36
Anyway you go please go with a CRUMPLER. I got a bunch of cases/bags/backpacks/slings and I was not completely happy until I got my THE DAILY xxl - 750.

I agree, LOVE these bags!

nutsnbolts
31st of October 2007 (Wed), 10:44
I agree, LOVE these bags!

Bootsie, you have one? If so, where or how did you get it?

Bootsie
31st of October 2007 (Wed), 13:57
Bootsie, you have one? If so, where or how did you get it?

No, I am just talking about Crumpler. I have both 7 and 5 million dollar homes. My laptop is a 15.4 in screen so it is too big for most shoulder bags that are small enough to carry everyday.

nutsnbolts
31st of October 2007 (Wed), 14:04
No, I am just talking about Crumpler. I have both 7 and 5 million dollar homes. My laptop is a 15.4 in screen so it is too big for most shoulder bags that are small enough to carry everyday.

Gah! You got me all excited! I may have to settle for a 7 MDH.

Bootsie
31st of October 2007 (Wed), 14:09
Gah! You got me all excited! I may have to settle for a 7 MDH.

Sorry, the 7MDH is great though!

dahl
1st of November 2007 (Thu), 01:26
I'll be more specific.
My regular lens right now is 28-135, which is attached to the XI body (with the grip) most of the time. If I can find a bag (and it looks like it :)) that will fit what along with another lens of the same size and the 420EX. So one body with grip, two lenses and a flash.

(I will exchange the extra lens room for a camcorder sometimes, it will probably not be an issue sizewise, since it's about the same size as the 28-135.)

sugarzebra
1st of November 2007 (Thu), 01:36
I would highly recommend the 7MDH...its only deficiency has already been mentioned; the hand strap is awful and I never use anything but the shoulder strap to lift the bag. I use it to carry a body with 24-105 attached in the middle, 70-200 with hood reversed on one side and the 16-35 & 580Ex on the other side. I stick the battery charger in one of the outside 'hidden' pockets where the shoulder strap attaches and an off shoe cord & cable release in the other.

harrydog
1st of November 2007 (Thu), 09:14
I'd suggest one of these bags from Think Tank. I've heard very good things about them.
http://www.thinktankphoto.com/ttp_product_UrbnDsgs2.php
I personally hate the look of Crumpler bags. Too cutsie. Otherwise, I'm sure their good.
In fact, I think I'm going to get one of the small Urban Disguise bagsfor when I just need to carry a camera, an extra lens and a few other accessories.

BearLeeAlive
1st of November 2007 (Thu), 09:32
I'd suggest one of these bags from Think Tank. I've heard very good things about them.
http://www.thinktankphoto.com/ttp_product_UrbnDsgs2.php
I personally hate the look of Crumpler bags. Too cutsie. Otherwise, I'm sure their good.
I don't have this bag, but have a few TT products, and they are probably the best build out there, maybe even better than Domke, and definitely better than Crumpler.
I have to agree on the looks of the Crumpler bags, way to fruity looking for me, but I am not a fashion type guy by any means. :) As i had mentioned, I looked them over real good and just could not bring myself to don those bright colours.

But, as is any gear, one most definitely should check out the stuff in person if at all possible. Everyone has their own specific needs and taste and can only make a proper decision by trying things out.

Jon
1st of November 2007 (Thu), 12:47
I'd take a look at the Domke F-3x.

Tony-S
2nd of November 2007 (Fri), 00:05
I really like my Domke F-2. The clasps were a little tight the first few months, but they've loosened up nicely.

In2Photos
2nd of November 2007 (Fri), 10:16
I'd take a look at the Domke F-3x.
After getting mine yesterday I definitely agree with Jon that the F-3x is a great choice here.

nutsnbolts
2nd of November 2007 (Fri), 10:43
After getting mine yesterday I definitely agree with Jon that the F-3x is a great choice here.

Welcome to the DOmke F-3x club!

In2Photos
2nd of November 2007 (Fri), 10:55
Welcome to the DOmke F-3x club!
Hehe, thanks. I think it will take over the daily duties and my F-2 will become the bag when I need to take everything.

Bosman
2nd of November 2007 (Fri), 13:13
Hehe, thanks. I think it will take over the daily duties and my F-2 will become the bag when I need to take everything.


Cool!

Are ya gonna post some pics and a review?

Knew you would love it!

In2Photos
2nd of November 2007 (Fri), 16:42
Cool!

Are ya gonna post some pics and a review?

Knew you would love it!
Yeah I will. It probably won't be for a few days as I have a lot going on, but I will definitely post pics and a review.

canotographer
3rd of November 2007 (Sat), 00:11
My suggestion is 7 million dollar home.
My second suggestion is buy the barney rustle blanket and add a barney/western bucket. I like this better than the 6/7MDH.. it's because the bucket insertion has a zipper that you can completely secure your gears in it. Plus the rustle blanket bag looks much cooler than 6/7MDH ( to me)...

I got my bag from RIE.com for $30 + $65 for the bucket. Total is less than $100. Cheaper than 6- and 7- MDH

_aravena
6th of November 2007 (Tue), 08:32
^That's if they still have them. They are also larger in width which is alright. I don't mind it too much, though sometimes I wish I for the Luncheon instead. I have a 7MDH for sell now

mr5parkle
6th of November 2007 (Tue), 14:08
Crumpler $6M FTW!

Double Negative
6th of November 2007 (Tue), 17:04
For a stealthy, sweet bag to shoot from I can't say enough good things about the Crumpler "___ Million Dollar Home" bags. While not perfect, they're pretty close. I have two and love them.

eelnoraa
6th of November 2007 (Tue), 18:10
I don't want to let the open discussion get personal. I am NOT saying Crumplers are not good. I am just simplely expressing my experience of using 5 & 6 MDH. And I want to emphasize on their flaws (to me) because this is probably what protential buyers want to know.

Now to answer your questions, I don't carried purse but I don't carry camera everyday either. When I carry camera, it is usually on social outtings, vacations .... It is very conviient if a camera bag can carry a few more items and allow for easy retreival without exposing cameras. This items, in my experience can be airline/train/theme park tickets, train schedules, theme park map .... All misc small things that you won't have in daily life. To me, both 5 & 6 MDH didn't really do it for me in this aspect.

eel


No. You don't know Crumplers well. And seriously, gotta go with Dr. Cox on this one. Why do men carry around this little pouches for cell phones? Perhaps the invention of the pocket was too much for them to carry keys, tickets, etc. Maybe we all should have purses like the ladies.

Sorry, it cracks me up when people mention stuff like this, but do you carry a purse around when your camera bag isn't with you? 'Cause if you don't, where's all that go normally and why can't it go there now?

Aniwho, back to my original statement, the 5MDH is larger than you think but the 6MDH is bigger and taller. Yes, you got to be specific when you ask questions, but you can get more in the 5MDH then he listed. Two small lens atop each other and I speak of 30 F1.4 and 50 F1.8/4 or 85 F1.8 and maybe tubes. I don't own an 85 so I'm not sure of size. Or 70-200 with hood. Check my review on it. Just Click the 7MDH link in my sig, it's in the same thread.

Also, if you need the space, the MDH's have slots on the side to attach pouches like their Thirsty Al's which are get for, "personal things, such as key, cell phone, paper, tickets" if need be. i use mine for camera batteries and a Large Bundle for additional lens or flash or anything really. It hold my 10-20 and 50 real well. I was just checking size.

Keys, cell phone, wallet, and the sort, well if I have cargos on, plenty of room, if not, wallet in back pocket, keys in the other, cell on one side and leaves one open. Go me!

I've been debating psychology all night, please forgive me for my upbeat sarcasm.

The list of my gear in the bag is in the review, but the empty space holds my 20D with handstrap, neckstrap, and 18-50 F2.8 w/ hood attached.

canotographer
6th of November 2007 (Tue), 21:25
I share some of your concerns about the _MDH series.

I miss the inner flap that covers the entire gear compartment from my older crumpler bag... I simply feel more secured with the double flap system.

The placement of the handstrap is a flaw to me as you mentioned.

And Cumpler's camera bags are always lacking enough space for personal stuff.

I therefor bought the rustle blanket and the bucket. Most of my concerns are addressed now.

[quote=dahl;4210109]XI with a grip and lens attached, 480 flash and a couple of extra lenses (or at least one).

Maybe something along the line of the 5MDH bag?
quote]

Can you be more specific about what is the attached lens? How many extra lens will you bring along and what they are? Because if you are looking at 5MDH, these are important questions.

The 5MDH is a rather short bag, the longest lens you want to attached to XTi and still fit is probably 24-105L or 17-55IS (Even this one is a little stretch). If you put the flash on one side, then you can only fit another small lens on the other side. Small kens here means 50f1.8/f.14, 85f1.8, kit lens size.

I used to like Crumper quite alot, but after using them for a while, I found some flaws with 5 & 6 MDH:

1) very little space for other personal things, such as key, cell phone, paper, tickets ... unless you want to put them into the camera compartment.

2) Even if you just want to retreive some personal things in the front pocket, you need to open the flap and expose camera equipment. Older Crumpler has additional flap covering the camera compartment, but these two newer model do have it.

3) Handstrap sew on flap, so you need to make sure the flap is fully secured with the buckle before using the handstrap. My lowepro strealth reportor 300's hand strap is attached to the D-ring on the side, so I can put it up and go even the flap is not close at all.

4) At least for 6 MDH, it is actaully not very pratically use the space. My SR 300 is physically the same size as 6 MDH, but I can fit more in it.

5) the velcro on the flap gets annoying. I much prefer buckle or zipper because they can stay open or close securely.

After all the flaws, Crumpler actually cushion the camera quipment very well and looks very good outside.

eel

Double Negative
7th of November 2007 (Wed), 10:10
Walking around WDW for a five-day stint, at any given time in my 7MDH I usually kept:

1D2N, 16-35, 24-70, 35L or 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 580EX, ST-E2, Lumiquest Promax System, Spare AAs, Formula MC and tissues, Q-tips, Spare CFs, Spare NP-E2 and the following: A Gap anorak collapsed into a pocket (for rain and evenings), a pack of butts and a lighter (when I smoked), a cellphone - and a half-yard glass from the Rose and Crown!

I quickly trimmed the fat after day one. Way too heavy. But I kept most of the gear. Don't kid yourself, if you really wanted to, you can get a LOT of crap into a 7MDH.

As for the top handle, yeah, it's *useless* unless the bag is empty. The "hidden pockets" are useless too if the bag is stuffed.

_aravena
7th of November 2007 (Wed), 10:18
^Yeah. Although stuffed I did manage my remote down one. The filter wallet was a little tight, but would have worked if I needed it. The only day I had it stuffed was Universal Rock the Universe. Heavy, but light. The strap did a great job and Having the camera w/ grip at the time and 100-400L or 70-200 F2.8 out does lighten the load.

I only used the handle in my car, picking it up and moving the bag from front to back or something. Just easier for a quick pickup.

dahl
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 03:42
I'd take a look at the Domke F-3x.
I really like my Domke F-2. The clasps were a little tight the first few months, but they've loosened up nicely.

I understand that both of these bags are great, but I'm not super crazy about how they look.

BearLeeAlive
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 08:52
I understrand that both of these bags are great, but I'm not super crazy about how they look.
This is exactly why folks should try them out in person. Everyone is looking with different ideas of what they want in their mind.

I believe Domke bags to be the one of the best looking, most functional and well built bag out there, right along with the ThinkTank stuff. But, I am one who does not like my bags to look bright and colourful and that is the biggest thing I did not like about Crumpler. I was just in the store on the weekend, and looked them all over one more time. (I'm starting to understand my wifes obsession with purses now ;)).

_aravena
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 09:01
^They're pretty!!! I love my blue 7MDH. Though I do need to sale...maybe. No hits, I'll close it again.

BearLeeAlive
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 09:35
^They're pretty!!! I love my blue 7MDH. Though I do need to sale...maybe. No hits, I'll close it again.
LOL, I don't do pretty well!!! ;)

_aravena
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 09:40
^Yeah, I ust like mine. I like that it's blue actually, it's different. Kinda why i wen for it. The red is too bright though.

Bootsie
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 10:20
I love my red crumpler! No one thinks that it is a camera bag. But I am young, so it kind of fits with me.

In2Photos
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 10:30
I understrand that both of these bags are great, but I'm not super crazy about how they look.
I love the way they look. Then add all the functionality and great build in to the equation and that makes them the best IMO. I took some pics of my F-3x last night and I hope to do a review soon. I think I lke it better than my F-2. :shock:

Bosman
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 11:13
I love the way they look. Then add all the functionality and great build in to the equation and that makes them the best IMO. I took some pics of my F-3x last night and I hope to do a review soon. I think I lke it better than my F-2. :shock:


Told ya, told ya, told ya........... lol

Can't wait for the pics and review.

Gidi Morris
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 15:03
I love the way they look. Then add all the functionality and great build in to the equation and that makes them the best IMO. I took some pics of my F-3x last night and I hope to do a review soon. I think I lke it better than my F-2. :shock:

I ordered a Navy Canvas f-3x for my self last night :)
Can't wait for it to arrive.

I spent the morning photographing a religious festival in Jerusalem this morning & knowing my new domke was in the mail on the way just made me hate my LowePro more.
When ever I'm running around on a photojournalism assignment I can't feel envious of the veterans running around with their Domkes... can't wait for mine to arrive!

_aravena
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 15:05
I wish they weren't so expensive. The smallest bag for Nat Geo or Domke is still $60. I just want something for camera, lens, and flash.

In2Photos
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 15:11
I ordered a Navy Canvas f-3x for my self last night :)
Can't wait for it to arrive.

I spent the morning photographing a religious festival in Jerusalem this morning & knowing my new domke was in the mail on the way just made me hate my LowePro more.
When ever I'm running around on a photojournalism assignment I can't feel envious of the veterans running around with their Domkes... can't wait for mine to arrive!
Congrats and welcome to the club.
I wish they weren't so expensive. The smallest bag for Nat Geo or Domke is still $60. I just want something for camera, lens, and flash.
Jon has had his Domke bags for like 20 years, so that means about $5 a year at today's prices. How many other bags will you go through? I paid full price for my F-2 but my F-3x was a steal, $75 used but looks brand new.

_aravena
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 15:13
Well, I have a small cheap Case Logic that holds my film gear and can fit my needs, just gotta throw the film gear somewhere, and it's lasted 6yrs. So...those kinda things mean little to me. I know how long somethings can last depsite what people say.

Lowepro seems to be the cheapest...guess I need to go to my camera store again and see if there's anything I like.

Samba
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 20:06
For the ulitmate stealth bag, look no further than the Domke lineup. I really like my F-803, so much that I bought another one in tan! I think they are great for travel and/or daily photography. If you like to have your camera with you for any occasion, this is your bag. When I travel, I can also carry a couple of lenses, maps, phone, etc., and not look like a tourist. The satchel style looks great too, IMO. It is not necessarily the bag for someone that needs to transport a ton of gear, but I'm somewhat of a minimalist. However, even if I need to bring all of my lenses, I can bring the 10-22, 24-70 and 50mm 1.4 with no problem in this bag.

Cheers!

printguy
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 21:24
I'm another Domke addict. You might take a look at the F-4A as it looks a little different from the bags you mentioned. It's a little deeper (top to bottom) than the F-3X and the F-2 and the top flap fit is better IMHO. It's perfect for a body/grip with lens mounted, 2 other lenses/flashes with plenty of room in the side and front pockets for misc. stuff (or leave 'em empty for lighter carry. It takes my 40D with 24-70L mounted with hood in place for shooting.

dahl
8th of November 2007 (Thu), 23:15
OK, I'll take a look at the Domke bags in person.
In the end, the most important thing is how well the bag works, not how it looks.

BearLeeAlive
9th of November 2007 (Fri), 00:13
OK, I'll take a look at the Domke bags in person.
In the end, the most important thing is how good the bag works, not how it looks.
This is why folks choose Domke or ThinkTank.

Double Negative
9th of November 2007 (Fri), 09:19
If you want a sharp bag, get yourself one of those fancy Billinghams... :p

Samba
9th of November 2007 (Fri), 11:41
This is why folks choose Domke or ThinkTank.

Exactly, the good looks are only a bonus. Functionality is where they get you first and foremost.

nutsnbolts
9th of November 2007 (Fri), 14:48
Exactly, the good looks are only a bonus. Functionality is where they get you first and foremost.

ThinkTank is not a fancy bag. It's all black! Suttle, sophisticated, professional and highly functionable (if that's even a word). Take a look at my reviews and after reading my reviews you'll see how I focus on how all the features in the bag is all about functionality.

BearLeeAlive
9th of November 2007 (Fri), 16:37
ThinkTank is not a fancy bag. It's all black! Suttle, sophisticated, professional and highly functionable (if that's even a word). Take a look at my reviews and after reading my reviews you'll see how I focus on how all the features in the bag is all about functionality.
I'll be subtle here about your spelling, but you were bang on with functionable, it is indeed a word. :)

Not only all what you said is true about TT, they are also very well built. I have entertained thoughts of buying a bunch of their products, and have a few things right now, the Digital Holster 20, neck strap, and clips to hold either the DH or the neck strap to the shoulder straps of a backpack for good support.

coorz
9th of November 2007 (Fri), 17:28
If you want a sharp bag, get yourself one of those fancy Billinghams... :p
+1.

BearLeeAlive
9th of November 2007 (Fri), 17:37
If you want a sharp bag, get yourself one of those fancy Billinghams... :p
There is no doubt there, they are a great bag in everyway....

....except the cost. It really seems high, even though they are a great bag.

nutsnbolts
9th of November 2007 (Fri), 18:57
I'll be subtle here about your spelling, but you were bang on with functionable, it is indeed a word. :)

Not only all what you said is true about TT, they are also very well built. I have entertained thoughts of buying a bunch of their products, and have a few things right now, the Digital Holster 20, neck strap, and clips to hold either the DH or the neck strap to the shoulder straps of a backpack for good support.

Wow! I didn't even notice and I know how to spell it too. Nevertheless, I feel like a walking tank. ThinkTank that is, everyone of my gear is technically Thinktank! Once you go Thinktank, you neve go back. Well I do have a Domke F-3x which I love, a Lowepro Vertex 200AW which I also like, however, it's probably going to be taken over by a Thinktank.

nutsnbolts
9th of November 2007 (Fri), 18:58
+1.

Billingham is nice indeed and expensive!

Samba
10th of November 2007 (Sat), 11:48
ThinkTank is not a fancy bag. It's all black! Suttle, sophisticated, professional and highly functionable (if that's even a word). Take a look at my reviews and after reading my reviews you'll see how I focus on how all the features in the bag is all about functionality.

I don't remember saying that they were fancy. In fact, part of the reason I like Domke is because they are not fancy. The perfect intersection between subtle looks and functionality are a big seller for me. Don't know much about ThinkTank, so I'll check out your reveiws.

nutsnbolts
10th of November 2007 (Sat), 12:03
I don't remember saying that they were fancy. In fact, part of the reason I like Domke is because they are not fancy. The perfect intersection between subtle looks and functionality are a big seller for me. Don't know much about ThinkTank, so I'll check out your reveiws.

I never made a comparison between what is fancy or fancier, etc. Just simply stating that for anyone thinking about ThinkTank products, they should know. ThinkTank is not fancy at all. If anything, domke is a relax'd look, Thinktank is a professional look, and crumpler's are a "fun" look. It's all subjective but if you look at Thinktank products all around, they all follow a form and function and that is black packed with goodies.

Eitherway, take a look at the reviews, they are definately informative and I have receive tremendous feedback through PM's regarding them and it's one of those companies that doesn't get a a lot of attention due to it's nature of it being geared more for the "professional" crowd but also fits non-professional due to it's functional abilities, so to speak.

Captain Mantastic
11th of November 2007 (Sun), 22:05
i love the 7 MDH... i got mine from here...http://www.midwestbags.com/index.php?cPath=51

i can't remember the code, but i got my 7 MDH for $97 including shipping (arrived 1.5 days after i ordered it)

i have heard a lot of people with great results from this company. do a search on here for them and see if you can find the code. they also carry a lot of other bag brands too.