Paul_O
3rd of September 2004 (Fri), 03:39
Had an interesting visit to some of the local"good" camera stores the other day. Went looking to purchase a 50mm F1.8 MkII with $$ in my hand in the hope of picking one up.
Camera store 1, not in stock but can get it from Head Office in Sydney in approx 1-2 weeks. Quoted max RRP and when asked if he could do better, was told no. Fine, go to store 2.
Store 2. Interrupted sales clerk reading the newspaper after 5 minutes (good start, must have been a good article!). Qtd off the cuff $30 above retail but apparently had it in stock. When told he was $30-$40 off the mark price wise (for a A$180 lens) was told rudely that it's easy for others to quote lower prices (RRP) when they didn't have it in stock. When I asked to have a look at it as I still may be interested he checked out back and found that they didn't have one and went back to the newspaper. I was waiting for "would you like me to order one for you?" but nope, must have been that great article again ! :shock:
Store number 3, where I bought my 300D, not in stock but can get it in. Quoted full RRP and when asked if they could do better on the price as I recently spent A$1800 with them was told no, it's a very popular product and the margins are slim. If it's so popular then why don't they have it in stock ? :?
At no stage did I act rude or clueless and am in fact in the sales industry as a sales manager. What is wrong with these people ? Do they realise that there is an enormous number of online companies selling 20-30% below retail who offer better service than a bricks and mortar store ? Maybe the digital camera "boom" has changed their way of doing business and they're just waiting for the next P&S buyer to walk through their door with a fist full of dollars.
That's my rant for the day, would be interested in others stories.
Camera store 1, not in stock but can get it from Head Office in Sydney in approx 1-2 weeks. Quoted max RRP and when asked if he could do better, was told no. Fine, go to store 2.
Store 2. Interrupted sales clerk reading the newspaper after 5 minutes (good start, must have been a good article!). Qtd off the cuff $30 above retail but apparently had it in stock. When told he was $30-$40 off the mark price wise (for a A$180 lens) was told rudely that it's easy for others to quote lower prices (RRP) when they didn't have it in stock. When I asked to have a look at it as I still may be interested he checked out back and found that they didn't have one and went back to the newspaper. I was waiting for "would you like me to order one for you?" but nope, must have been that great article again ! :shock:
Store number 3, where I bought my 300D, not in stock but can get it in. Quoted full RRP and when asked if they could do better on the price as I recently spent A$1800 with them was told no, it's a very popular product and the margins are slim. If it's so popular then why don't they have it in stock ? :?
At no stage did I act rude or clueless and am in fact in the sales industry as a sales manager. What is wrong with these people ? Do they realise that there is an enormous number of online companies selling 20-30% below retail who offer better service than a bricks and mortar store ? Maybe the digital camera "boom" has changed their way of doing business and they're just waiting for the next P&S buyer to walk through their door with a fist full of dollars.
That's my rant for the day, would be interested in others stories.