PDA

View Full Version : DR 18-55 Kit Lens, which filter?


Spargo
6th of September 2004 (Mon), 20:10
I have a question regarding filters for the 18-55mm lens that comes with the digital rebel. Does it come with a lens filter (to protect the lens)? And if not, what size of a filter would I need and could anyone suggest a good one, or a good set of filters?

Spargo
6th of September 2004 (Mon), 20:12
Also while you are reading this, could anyone tell me if it's possible to do time exposures on the 300D and 10D without a cable connected to a computer? I'm fiddling around with a 10D and can't figure it out.

robertwgross
6th of September 2004 (Mon), 21:01
And if not, what size of a filter would I need and could anyone suggest a good one, or a good set of filters?

Digital Rebel standard lens has a 58mm filter size.

What kind of filter set are you looking for? Typical ones are UV and circular polarizer.

---Bob Gross---

ScottH
6th of September 2004 (Mon), 21:01
The kit lens takes 58mm filters. I'd suggest UV, Circular polarizer, and neutral density filters to start. Some people prefer using a lens hood (EW-60C for the kit lens) instead of a UV filter.

Scott

robertwgross
6th of September 2004 (Mon), 21:03
Also while you are reading this, could anyone tell me if it's possible to do time exposures on the 300D and 10D without a cable connected to a computer? I'm fiddling around with a 10D and can't figure it out.

It depends on what you call a time exposure. Either camera can shoot with the shutter set to Bulb. That and a wristwatch, and away you go.

---Bob Gross---

Spargo
6th of September 2004 (Mon), 21:06
I think I'll go with UV. Which of these brands would you recommend?

Canon
Tiffen
Hoya
Sunpak
B+W
Heliopan

Any specific recommendations?

Spargo
6th of September 2004 (Mon), 21:07
Also while you are reading this, could anyone tell me if it's possible to do time exposures on the 300D and 10D without a cable connected to a computer? I'm fiddling around with a 10D and can't figure it out.

It depends on what you call a time exposure. Either camera can shoot with the shutter set to Bulb. That and a wristwatch, and away you go.

---Bob Gross---

I mean like those shots where you can take a picture of the road when it's nighttime and see the streaks of tail lights of cars that passed by the last 20 seconds or so.

robertwgross
6th of September 2004 (Mon), 21:13
It would work if you can watch your wristwatch for 20 seconds or so.

It'll be easier if you use a remote cord. Basically, you click the remote button to open the shutter, then temporarily lock it, then close it when your wristwatch tells you the time is up.

---Bob Gross---

Spargo
6th of September 2004 (Mon), 21:18
How would I do that without a remote or cable, just with the camera?

robertwgross
6th of September 2004 (Mon), 21:24
It would require you to hold your index finger down on the shutter button for the time interval. Using the remote cable is a lot easier.

---Bob Gross---

Spargo
6th of September 2004 (Mon), 22:01
Thanks I got it figured out. Turns out I had it right in the first place just not the right conditions. I set the exposure time to a few seconds, pointed towards my computer (which has 9 80mm LED fans) and moved the camera around a bit. Made some cool designs. :)

waveydavey
1st of February 2005 (Tue), 10:44
spargo - what filter did you get for your kit lens in the end? I'm pondering the same question.

S230
1st of February 2005 (Tue), 10:55
Also while you are reading this, could anyone tell me if it's possible to do time exposures on the 300D and 10D without a cable connected to a computer? I'm fiddling around with a 10D and can't figure it out.
By default, the 300D has various exposure time from 1 second to 30 seconds. If u use bulb, it's best to use a remote. If you are handy with electronics or wiring, you can make your own.
Use a small stereo jack, I stripped apart a hand's free plug for my cell phone and wired the tip and body to a toggle switch. This will allow me to control how long to leave the shutter open.

Andy_T
1st of February 2005 (Tue), 11:29
The easier version would be to use the self timer...

Best regards,
Andy

DocFrankenstein
1st of February 2005 (Tue), 12:28
IMO protection isn't needed. The lens is only a 100 bucks.

If you put a 20$ UV filter on it, you'll get flare and soft images.

If you want to preserve the quality, you'll need the HOYA PRO1, which costs just as much as the lens itself.

If you're the protector type, then get a lens hood. Cuts down on flare.

S230
1st of February 2005 (Tue), 13:00
You can also try and pick one up from a garage sale or used one from a photo show. I recently picked up a UV protector for my lens for $5. The only downside is that it is written "Nik*n" on it... :(

Medic1
1st of February 2005 (Tue), 13:08
I'm partial to Hoya filters myself, UV and Circ. Polarizing....have had good results with them. Not only are they good for the effect, but they will protect your lens if god forbid you drop it. Better to replace the filter than the glass in the lens or the lens itself

Jon
1st of February 2005 (Tue), 13:19
The only downside is that it is written "Nik*n" on it... :(
Look at that as theft protection . . .

S230
1st of February 2005 (Tue), 13:51
Look at that as theft protection . . .
lol... That should really discourage that.. hehe..
=P