CyberDyneSystems
9th of September 2004 (Thu), 19:05
I just thought I'd share this little trip down memory lane...
As we learn more about taking photos we can get better results.. the same is true of learning the software and techniques in post processing.
One of the images that was a "breakthrough" for me (at least in my mind) was of a night heron at sunset.
This was the first real chance I had ever had to get such a clear image in that "golden time" and it was a true lesson in why timing and lighting combine to be "everything"
I posted it here a little over a year ago now.. thinking that my Sigma 50-500mm was the best lens ever and that the extra time I had taken using a RAW image to start with was the best Post processing I had ever done. (at the time I was VERY new to working with RAW files)
Well I looked at that reduced jpeg in my gallery the other day and said to myself ,. I said "self,.. you didn't have a clue did you?"
So I found the RAW file and did a new conversion.. fixed the very ODD crop I had selected..
It's not that the first try was junk.. but it certainly could stand some guidance from the now more experienced CDS
Perhaps in a year I will dig it up and try again :)
Anyway.. I thought it sort of shows one of the advantages to digital in general and RAW as well.. we can always tweak some more.
http://images.fotopic.net/?iid=yfdh4c&outx=600&noresize=1
It has replaced the original in my gallery.. but I moved the old one elsewhere so I could post the difference.
http://images.fotopic.net/?iid=yf42k1&outx=600&noresize=1
As we learn more about taking photos we can get better results.. the same is true of learning the software and techniques in post processing.
One of the images that was a "breakthrough" for me (at least in my mind) was of a night heron at sunset.
This was the first real chance I had ever had to get such a clear image in that "golden time" and it was a true lesson in why timing and lighting combine to be "everything"
I posted it here a little over a year ago now.. thinking that my Sigma 50-500mm was the best lens ever and that the extra time I had taken using a RAW image to start with was the best Post processing I had ever done. (at the time I was VERY new to working with RAW files)
Well I looked at that reduced jpeg in my gallery the other day and said to myself ,. I said "self,.. you didn't have a clue did you?"
So I found the RAW file and did a new conversion.. fixed the very ODD crop I had selected..
It's not that the first try was junk.. but it certainly could stand some guidance from the now more experienced CDS
Perhaps in a year I will dig it up and try again :)
Anyway.. I thought it sort of shows one of the advantages to digital in general and RAW as well.. we can always tweak some more.
http://images.fotopic.net/?iid=yfdh4c&outx=600&noresize=1
It has replaced the original in my gallery.. but I moved the old one elsewhere so I could post the difference.
http://images.fotopic.net/?iid=yf42k1&outx=600&noresize=1