Wedding Rings

[spcalan]

CC Please

[p3photogal]

they are VERY oof...

[Flo]

Sorry.they are really not in focus at all:(

[Shaggy]

Tripod? This looks like it was handheld at a slow shutter speed. The white balance looks off also as there is a strong greenish colorcast. you have exif info?

[Photogenic_photo]

This picture is a bit blurry and it doesn't really draw me to it. Perhaps if you used bright colors? It's quite boring.

[spcalan]

I had to manual focus them
very tough.I should have used my 50mm.

[Broncobear]

MF close up means you need a tripod good lighting is adviseable as well. Why b&W?

[Baadil]

I tried sharpening your image and I think it becomes a lot better with a little PP.

[Flo]

I still find it too OOF to be helped really.

[mrandrew]

Yuck, way too OOF

[Baadil]

Sharpenning might help on larger/original image.

[Reeforbust]

Out of Focus is out of focus no matter how much PP you do....

For sure use a tripod and try a darker backdrop to make these baby's POP!!

[Broncobear]

I don't mean to sound harsh but really it's not going to help. Best thing one can do is try it again. Tripod...a black backdrop...and decent lighting

[samsen]

Yes do it again.

Here is my PP version but I am also agree with above.

[SnlpeR]

oof or too much camera shake
when i shoot rings...i get as close as the lens would let me and use somewhere around F9 or higher

[samsen]

Or for more similar to origin light:

[spcalan]

very nice

[vpnd]

sorry no bit of ps or anything will save this shot.

[stepatee]

The shot is way too out of focus, but I like the way the rings were placed and the lighting. Too bad it's probably not a shot you can easily take again :(

[spcalan]

Actually these are mine and my wife's rings on our kitchen table.

I am going to try again tomorrow night with my new 50mm 1.4 woohoo.