View Full Version : what is the sharpest non "L" series lens?
foxcrew
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 04:16
what is the sharpest non "L" series lens?
BearSummer
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 04:32
Hello again Foxcrew,
Primes are you best bet if you want Sharp
50mm 1.8 or 1.4
85mm 1.8
Best rergards
BearSummer
EXA1a
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 06:58
what is the sharpest non "L" series lens?
100/2.8 Macro
roanjohn
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 07:00
They're all pretty sharp stopped down.
But the sharpest non L lens is the 50 f1.4.......I think its also the fastest. (If I'm not mistaken).
And of course, all the non-L primes are just superb.............maybe except for the 28 f2.8 (though I could be wrong about that too).
Ro1
chris.bailey
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 08:38
50mm 1.4 is a fantastic lense. In terms of non L zooms I still think the 28-135 IS is a reasonably sharp performer as long as you stay away from fully open and is a bargain.
nosquare2003
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 08:40
And of course, all the non-L primes are just superb.............maybe except for the 28 f2.8 (though I could be wrong about that too).
Ro1
28/2.8 is sharp.
CyberDyneSystems
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 08:55
100mm f/2.8 macro
50mm 1.4
135mm f/2.8 soft focus
85mm f/1.8
50mm f/1.8
.... probably in that order. (wide open)
ron chappel
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 18:31
...and these lenses will beat some of the L zooms!
blinking8s
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 19:02
...and these lenses will beat some of the L zooms!
primes are hard to contest with...
Belmondo
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 19:17
I stopped in a large Los Angeles-Area camera store yesterday, and I asked the salesman what did he consider to be the best non-Canon lens he had in the store. He asked me what focal length I was looking for, and I told him I didn't really care---I just wanted to know what the best non-Canon lens was, period. He looked at me like I was nuts (well, I am, a little). After staring at me for a few moments (probably checking to see if my eyes were crossed and if I was drooling), he turned around and stared at the shelves where the 3rd-party lenses were stacked. He looked, and looked, and looked. Finally, he turned around and said, "I don't know. I've heard the Sigma 70-200 is pretty good."
This was interesting to me, because I know in my heart of hearts there are some really good third-party lenses out there, but few people seem to know (or agree) on which ones they are.
I bought another light meter.
timmyquest
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 20:40
I bought another light meter.
Have a bit of a spending addiction do we? (couldnt find a lens...so you had to buy "another" meter) :lol:
I agree with you, i'm sure there are some pretty cheap pretty sharp primes out there, its just a matter of finding them.
defordphoto
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 21:09
Yo Belmondo...that was some stupid salesperson. As much crap you buy, he should have been clued bigtime.
And yeah...you bought ANOTHER light meter? Heck, I have one and NEVER use it.
;)
timmyquest
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 21:11
And yeah...you bought ANOTHER light meter? Heck, I have one and NEVER use it.
;)
I've got one in my camera so i havnt found the need for one :lol:
Belmondo
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 21:26
And yeah...you bought ANOTHER light meter? Heck, I have one and NEVER use it.
;)
You don't buy them because you use them. You buy them because they make you look like you know what you'e doing. Very cool things. I especially like the looks of the Pentax Spotmeter V.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.