djtowle
28th of September 2004 (Tue), 20:55
:?: Anyone here have any direct/practical experiance to compare the 70-200mm 2.8l non-is with 1.4x or 2x converter to a 100-400L IS and/or a 75-300 DO - IS :?:
I have the former and if it were IS I wouldn't even ask the question; But I am curious how things stack-up to a lens with IS and no tele-converter? :roll:
TIA
I have the former and if it were IS I wouldn't even ask the question; But I am curious how things stack-up to a lens with IS and no tele-converter? :roll:
TIA