PDA

View Full Version : Casual Portrait - Burned and Dodged - What Next?


Radtech1
9th of February 2008 (Sat), 15:56
I recently learned of a photography contest where the topic is "Casual Portraits". They are looking for anything from DSLRs to P&S - the only criteria is that it is not studio and the less "posed" the better.

I took this shot several years ago with my 10D, when Marcia and I were on our first trip to Eaton's Ranch in Wyoming. It was a quick grab shot, and in 2003 I was extremely proud of the fact that I was able to clone out some electrical wires that were behind her head.

I had no concept of local enhancement, I thought that the shot could be modified all or nothing and that was it. As a result though horses face is a little dark, but I couldn't do anything about that without blowing out the sky. I have since figured out that you could brighten some areas dark and others, and the second post here is the result of today's editing.

I'm a little stymied by the crop. I realize that her face is dead center but I don't know what else to do at this point. I've tried cropping off some of the right and wasn't exactly satisfied. If anyone has any suggestions I am open to them, otherwise general critique and comment is very much encouraged.

Rad

Robert_Lay
9th of February 2008 (Sat), 17:00
I sympathize with your assessment of the first version.
However, I am not as impressed by the improvements in the second version as you are.
For example, while the horse's face is now lighter, I can take it or leave it.

My heartburn is the sky - it was fine in the first version and I don't like it as well in the second version because it is not as deep and as even.

One thing that I really like in this picture is the angel's wing that Marcia is wearing over her left shoulder.
So, you dassn't crop any part of the right half of the picture.

Radtech1
9th of February 2008 (Sat), 17:12
Good thought on the Angel's Wing. I didn't notice - that settles the crop issue.

As to the sky --- Does it not look too cyan in the first version? At least to me, that was the big problem - it seemed to be a blue that, well, dosen't look real.

Rad

Radtech1
9th of February 2008 (Sat), 17:23
How is this as an in between. I pulled the sky from the unededited shot, set the opacity at about 70%, and also darkened the horses face.

Rad

Robert_Lay
9th of February 2008 (Sat), 21:16
In that last rendition it looks like the horse's face has been lightened, not darkened.
Also, in this last one the sky does not look quite as contrasty as #1, and the "wing" doesn't seem as distinct, but I'm splitting hairs.