View Full Version : 20D -> Wedding Photography
Fir3
16th of October 2004 (Sat), 22:28
Is there any wedding photographer who already has the new 20d? What changed in illumination? Is the ettl 2 more accurate then the older?
I need some opinions. Thanks !
drisley
16th of October 2004 (Sat), 22:54
While I'm not a wedding photog, I can vouch for ETTL-II.
It works VERY well. In addition, the 20D is marvellous for low light photography (it's even better than the 1dMKii)
Just my 2 cents.
Malaxos1
17th of October 2004 (Sun), 01:49
I used the 20 D at a wedding a few weeks ago and it handled everything very well...Dean
Fir3
17th of October 2004 (Sun), 16:03
I used the 20 D at a wedding a few weeks ago and it handled everything very well...Dean
But did you own a 10d ?
Quinn Porter
17th of October 2004 (Sun), 16:17
I am not a wedding photographer, but I regularly use flash indoors. I upgraded from a digital rebel (ETTL) to the 20D (ETTL II) and will say that ETTL II is a big improvement as far as I'm concerned. ETTL II isn't fooled as often, and there is no longer the need to use FEL.
Persian-Rice
17th of October 2004 (Sun), 17:54
Or get a killer light meter................if you are doing this for money, there is nothing quite as accurate as a handheld meter.
Cheers
Fir3
17th of October 2004 (Sun), 21:11
I am not a wedding photographer, but I regularly use flash indoors. I upgraded from a digital rebel (ETTL) to the 20D (ETTL II) and will say that ETTL II is a big improvement as far as I'm concerned. ETTL II isn't fooled as often, and there is no longer the need to use FEL.
Aren't the 20d photos with those brown color tones anymore ?
Quinn Porter
17th of October 2004 (Sun), 21:37
I am not a wedding photographer, but I regularly use flash indoors. I upgraded from a digital rebel (ETTL) to the 20D (ETTL II) and will say that ETTL II is a big improvement as far as I'm concerned. ETTL II isn't fooled as often, and there is no longer the need to use FEL.
Aren't the 20d photos with those brown color tones anymore ?
I'm sorry, I don't understand your question.
Malaxos1
17th of October 2004 (Sun), 23:29
I used the 20 D at a wedding a few weeks ago and it handled everything very well...Dean
But did you own a 10d ?
I used a D60 before the 20D. I thought both did a tremendous job...Dean
Fir3
18th of October 2004 (Mon), 09:27
I am not a wedding photographer, but I regularly use flash indoors. I upgraded from a digital rebel (ETTL) to the 20D (ETTL II) and will say that ETTL II is a big improvement as far as I'm concerned. ETTL II isn't fooled as often, and there is no longer the need to use FEL.
Aren't the 20d photos with those brown color tones anymore ?
I'm sorry, I don't understand your question.
I have a 10d and the photos are almost 90% with a brown color tone (mainly at the shadows area)... I'm asking if this "problem" happens in the new 20d...
Quinn Porter
18th of October 2004 (Mon), 10:48
I have a 10d and the photos are almost 90% with a brown color tone (mainly at the shadows area)... I'm asking if this "problem" happens in the new 20d...
Never noticed this problem with my DRebel or the 20D, and I'm not aware that this is a common problem. Is it?
Fir3
18th of October 2004 (Mon), 11:35
I have a 10d and the photos are almost 90% with a brown color tone (mainly at the shadows area)... I'm asking if this "problem" happens in the new 20d...
Never noticed this problem with my DRebel or the 20D, and I'm not aware that this is a common problem. Is it?
I think so... Mainly when you shot indoor w/ flash...
cmM
18th of October 2004 (Mon), 22:29
Or get a killer light meter................if you are doing this for money, there is nothing quite as accurate as a handheld meter.
Cheers
when you shoot a wedding, you don't have a lot of time to run around with light meters in your hand.
I just shot a wedding this weekens with the rebel & 550EX. It did good, with a few issues, I too wonder if the flash metering on the 20d is considerably better. I want another body too.
WestFalcon
19th of October 2004 (Tue), 18:42
I tried using a good light meter with my digitals but proper exposure on the meter rarely gave me a well exposed histogram. One might have to calibrate your meter to the camera. I shoot whole weddings without a meter. I use the histogram instead. I don't have any complex lighting to do at a fast paced wedding.
Malaxos1
19th of October 2004 (Tue), 22:11
I had a Sekonik L358 and used it a few times, if you lern how to meter you could get by without it. I don't even own mine anymore...Dean
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.