Princess and Flowers

[Iamcuddles]

Just decided to mess around with lighting location on a few objects the other day. What do you all think? CC Thanks
http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i57/Iamcuddles/IMG_5451.jpg
http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i57/Iamcuddles/IMG_5480.jpg
http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i57/Iamcuddles/IMG_5452copy.jpg

[Iamcuddles]

75 views, no comments? They are just that good!!! YESSSSS

[shutter_blitz]

Its good that you are trying new things. I dislike #3 the least. I am saying that cause nothing has really captured my attention. #3 has more drama, is more stylized than the rest. The light creates a nice silhouette.
You don't seem to have any fill light, that would help a little in the first one. The shadows in the second one are especially harsh and unappealing to me. The colors on the flowers are unattractive.
I like softer indirect, diffused light. What kind of light did u use, direct or indirect?
I am not an expert, there are more knowledgable members on this forum who can critique further.

[Cobra351]

Sorry, these don't do anything for me. I can't quite tell what number two even is (unlike the first and third shots, the second picture doesn't seem to have a distinct subject). The lighting on two and three is a bit too "funky" for my tastes, doesn't work to compliment the subject, at least to me.

[howzitboy]

1. wish the "legs" werent cut off but i like exposure and textures.
2.what is it saying? too dark to really get a feel of what u trying to show.
3.not enough interest to keep attention. the blacks outweigh the rest of the photo too much.

kewl shots tho