NEW website design (w/portfolio)

[dapeegoo]

Hey guys,

I just launched my new website for my wedding photography.

www.wayneyuan.com (http://www.wayneyuan.com/) << check it out!

Any encouraging comments or feedback are welcome!



I'm located in NJ so if anyone needs a second shooter, PM me. [/COLOR]

[jlozano180]

Great job on the website, Very simple to get to things on the site. Great music to go with it. I'm sure the site took alot of work to get done. I like that your clients can go see your work without going threw 10 pages. great job on that.

[ToddziLLa]

One of the best websites I've seen in awhile...very nice! I'm sure that took many, many hours of hard work.

[Yella Fella]

site looks cool, music is fine :)... however even with a 2.5meg broadband connection, it took awhile for the pics to load for me :(

[Xisthreweyes]

Awesome site. Loaded fine for me, great feel to the whole thing.

[david888lee]

did you get this from bludomain.com by any chance. looks almost identical to some of the templates they have there?

on the other hand, it looks great! good job

[The ChangoMan]

Wow man...

[Michael]

Very nice site, I love it! The only thing I wouldn't do is have a gear list, clients aren't interested if you have the battery grip for the 5D or not. I would dump the gear list... Otherwise, great site!

[mr_e]

Looks like the same template as the site from this thread http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=463479

...and I have the same complaints as the people in that thread too

[EnronRocks]

I will add that to my list of very few flash based website I like. Good job!

Loads fast for me, but I am also on a 10 meg cable connection.

Looks like the same template as the site from this thread http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=463479
...and I have the same complaints as the people in that thread too

They do not look the same at all. Different loading style, colors, navigation.

[mr_e]

They do not look the same at all. Different loading style, colors, navigation.

The splash page has the same basic two sections, one site has the box width 100% while the other doesn't, and both have the exact same browser/flash requirement text

Entering into each site, I would break them each up into five sections
- The navigation, same location albeit different styles
- Slideshow, same location and about the same size, one appears to be full width though
- Title underneath slideshow, although one is aligned left and one is centered
- Copyright, same location though differing text
- The music player although in different positions, is near identical

I'm pretty sure they're both bludomain templates is what it is

Don't get me wrong, I like both and think (aside from being 100% flash which I don't like) they look great, but they are customized templates.

Annnnyyways, sorry for the tangent, but moving on I think it looks great, but the sound being on by default almost makes me close it instantly, I only didn't so I could critique the rest of it, but all the advice from the other thread would be my same advice to you.

Aside from the website, you have some really great photos! :D

[roentarre]

Great site. Love your layout and photographs!

[photoguy6405]

Only "encouraging" comments? How about 'honest' comments? ;)

In general, I like the feel and layout, though it does look similar to many others I've seen. A couple comments...

1) As far as I can tell, the intro page really serves no purpose other than to make me do extra mouse clicks. Why is it there? What purpose does it serve?

2) No, I'm not going to disable my pop-up blocker. It's enabled for good reason.

[pads69]

For me it feels like ive seen it before and I hate music on web pages I ve got my own music.
it was slow for me.
the picts were nice but took a while I dont want to be on a site for 10 min. JMOP
it did look good If you have the time.

[pads69]

I went back and it was very much faster this time. It does look nice.

[Tobiah]

it will be faster on return. your cache has it :D