review of the 10 - 22

[gramps]

here is the first review of the 10 - 22 that I have seen..............
http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=221&sort=7&thecat=27

[DocFrankenstein]

Now I want that.... :?

[drisley]

Doh, I am hoping that the lens kind of sucks, since I JUST bought a wide angle lens :twisted:
Thanks for posting.

[timmyquest]

Doh, I am hoping that the lens kind of sucks, since I JUST bought a wide angle lens :twisted:
Thanks for posting.

You must have missed the fact that it was a zoom :lol:

[drisley]

Ah yes, must not buy a zoom! :wink:
Actually, if I ever was to use a zoom, I think it would be most handy for wide angle.
I guess I can just tell myself that lens is only usable on EF-S compatible cameras, and someday I might want a full frame camera :roll:

[Persian-Rice]

Well if it's not quite as good as the 17-40. For that price, I guess it's only good for someone who is serious about landscapes.

But it's only one review, so who knows.

[sp00g3]

Well if it's not quite as good as the 17-40. For that price, I guess it's only good for someone who is serious about landscapes.

But it's only one review, so who knows.

Hehe, Yeah, and you can always tell yourself that you can pan and stitch pics together for a panoramic. which is MUCH wider

[izzypizzy]

he's also got a couple more pics on his site

http://www.thelimes.co.uk/testlens.htm

[roanjohn]

WHoA!!! Look at the HUGE difference between 10 and 17!!! :shock:

Canon!!! ..........MUST MAKE A 10 F4 PRIME NOW!!!!

........okay...........thats it!!!

Ro1

[gramps]

I think I'm gonna have to start a new slush fund................