Scottes
6th of November 2004 (Sat), 17:03
A recent topic, B&W: Camera vs Post Processing (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=47069), talked about comparing the 20D's Black & White mode to a processed B&W. I gave it a shot, just to see.
Since I've never ever ever "thought" in B&W before this was a stretch for me.
Here's the 20D's B&W mode image, from Large Fine JPG. Very little was done to this, with the thought being that B&W mode would be used if one was in a rush. This image got Level'd because it looked a bit underexposed, and a small amount of Curves was done.
http://www.itsanadventure.com/postimages/IronWorks_54177.jpg
This is the processed image. It was taken in RAW and converted in PS CS. It was a straight convert - I didn't change anything from the defaults. Strangely, even though this image had the exact same settings as the B&W, exposure looked correct.
Once converted I pulled the full gamut of processing. Some Shadows & Highlights, Levels, and Curves. I then proceeded to convert to B&W using this (http://www.adobe.com/tips/phs8colorbw/main.html) tutorial on Adobe's site, done by Russell Brown. This was not an extensive conversion since, as I said, I don't think in B&W. I moved sliders around, and got *some* idea of what I was doing after a couple minutes. I then proceeded to muck with the Hue & Saturation of the Blues to bring out the sky, and tried mucking with the Greens to change the grass. (The grass didn't change much.) I got it to a decent point, and then played for a bit without improvement so I called it Done.
http://www.itsanadventure.com/postimages/IronWorks_54176bw.jpg
Personally, I think that the sky alone was worth the extra effort of processing to B&W. I think the trees in the background look a little better in the processed version, but could still use some improvement. I think the wood in the processed version looks a little better but not by much. I'd still do a processed version if I ever did this again.
But I'd really like to see a comparsion done by someone who knows what they're doing, and using an image more appropriate to B&W. The B&W of this version doesn't do much for me.
For the curious, here's a fully processed color version which was used to create the second image. I like the color version a lot better - but I'm just not a B&W kind of guy. (Yet?)
http://www.itsanadventure.com/postimages/IronWorks_54176.jpg
Since I've never ever ever "thought" in B&W before this was a stretch for me.
Here's the 20D's B&W mode image, from Large Fine JPG. Very little was done to this, with the thought being that B&W mode would be used if one was in a rush. This image got Level'd because it looked a bit underexposed, and a small amount of Curves was done.
http://www.itsanadventure.com/postimages/IronWorks_54177.jpg
This is the processed image. It was taken in RAW and converted in PS CS. It was a straight convert - I didn't change anything from the defaults. Strangely, even though this image had the exact same settings as the B&W, exposure looked correct.
Once converted I pulled the full gamut of processing. Some Shadows & Highlights, Levels, and Curves. I then proceeded to convert to B&W using this (http://www.adobe.com/tips/phs8colorbw/main.html) tutorial on Adobe's site, done by Russell Brown. This was not an extensive conversion since, as I said, I don't think in B&W. I moved sliders around, and got *some* idea of what I was doing after a couple minutes. I then proceeded to muck with the Hue & Saturation of the Blues to bring out the sky, and tried mucking with the Greens to change the grass. (The grass didn't change much.) I got it to a decent point, and then played for a bit without improvement so I called it Done.
http://www.itsanadventure.com/postimages/IronWorks_54176bw.jpg
Personally, I think that the sky alone was worth the extra effort of processing to B&W. I think the trees in the background look a little better in the processed version, but could still use some improvement. I think the wood in the processed version looks a little better but not by much. I'd still do a processed version if I ever did this again.
But I'd really like to see a comparsion done by someone who knows what they're doing, and using an image more appropriate to B&W. The B&W of this version doesn't do much for me.
For the curious, here's a fully processed color version which was used to create the second image. I like the color version a lot better - but I'm just not a B&W kind of guy. (Yet?)
http://www.itsanadventure.com/postimages/IronWorks_54176.jpg