View Full Version : '40 Ford Deluxe Coupe - "TAPDOUT" - 4 pics
PhotosGuy
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 09:15
The last of these shots for the year! :( I had put the tripod away, bungeed it into the trunk, & was about to leave when this guy walked up & started talking photography. Then he said that this car was his & asked if I could shoot hand held in the low light levels. The car to one side was just leaving, so I said, "Why don't we try it & see?" I'd a lot rather have been at ISO 100 & f-11 but, except for the noise, they didn't come out too bad. Might be OK for 4X6" prints since the Jpg compression "cleaned up" some of the noise.
Two were RAW & two were Jpeg. Care to guess which are which?
It's running a 350 Chevy w/4 side draft Webers! Has Air, Pseat, Pwindows, cruise, P disk brakes. This is no trailer queen! He put 50,000 miles on it in the last 10 years, and the original paint job still looks immaculate.
300D, RAW, manual everything.
ISO 800, 1/80 sec @ f-7, 18mm.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v218/PhotosGuy/Car%20Stuff/40-FordDeluxeCoupe_frt_0102.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v218/PhotosGuy/Car%20Stuff/40-FordDeluxeCoupe_RQtr_104.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v218/PhotosGuy/Car%20Stuff/40-Ford-Deluxe-Coupe_FrtQtr3_100.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v218/PhotosGuy/Car%20Stuff/40-Ford-Deluxe-Coupe_350_98.jpg
c0ntr0lz
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 09:42
some awesome shots there bud!!!
like the way you're editing them, look great
KirkM
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 09:51
Those are some killer shots Frank!! Not to mention your PhotoShop skills :)
Kirk
Ballen Photo
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 10:28
Frank, For shooting this at iso 800, I think these came out VERY well. :shock:
Thanks for sharing these shots of a Very nice (and Interesting) Driver. :wink: :D
-Bruce
marie
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 11:28
8) very nice
quote
"Two were RAW & two were Jpeg. Care to guess which are which?"
unquote
hard to tell
the first two raw ... I think?
in the second last shot the car looks like had been in a crash and the panel beating job was not great
(photoshop or panel beating ?)
maybe it's just the 'jpeg' quality I see ?
if it is one of the jpegs
the second shot is raw .
(?)
???
:lol:
it's beautiful anyway
Belmondo
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 11:35
I always loved the '40 Ford coupe. I helped my cousin build one many years ago. We sure never imagined installing an engine like that in it. In fact, his had a pumped-up flathead with three Stromberg 97 2-barrel carburetors and some spiffy-looking Offenhauser aluminum heads on it. I really love the Weber setup in this photo. I'll bet it's a bear to setup.
PhotosGuy
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 11:36
Thanks, everyone. That could become my fav car if I can get it into an empty parking lot next Summer.
Re: Not to mention your PhotoShop skills
The car is the real "Star" here. The PS work is really not that hard! Almost everything "hard" I used is posted in the "Post Processing Tutorials List" under "Contrast Control" & "Selecting areas in PhotoShop".
Give it a try. :wink:
PhotosGuy
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 11:41
Looks like we 'cross posted'.
his had a pumped-up flathead with three Stromberg 97 2-barrel carburetors and some spiffy-looking Offenhauser aluminum heads on it.
That was the Greaser Standard back in the '50s! :lol: :lol: It still would look good today.
Marie: Maybe yes..., & maybe no! :lol:
marie
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 11:50
Marie: Maybe yes..., & maybe no! :lol:
:shock:
that's not playing fair Frank
you asked a Q
so what's the (correct) answer :? ???
I don't mind if I am/was wrong
(do you)?
:lol: :p :lol: :p :lol:
I just want to know :x
:?
:mrgreen:
marie
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 11:53
:shock:
I get it
(sod)
you want more replies before you tell.
:p :p :p :p
MegaTrixel
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 12:03
These pics... Absolutely beautiful!
Odd reflection on the last one (on the lower right). I thought it was a scratch in the paint at first. Then I realized, "hey we're not looking at my car here... there's no way there's a scratch in the paint".
Belmondo
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 12:18
These pics... Absolutely beautiful!
Odd reflection on the last one (on the lower right). I thought it was a scratch in the paint at first. Then I realized, "hey we're not looking at my car here... there's no way there's a scratch in the paint".
Hey, you're right. What is that?
JMAS
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 12:26
Professional work! :shock:
Awesome car too.
I think the first two are raw since they seem to show a better control over the sharpness and detail in shadows.
Jaime
Belmondo
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 12:31
These pics... Absolutely beautiful!
Odd reflection on the last one (on the lower right). I thought it was a scratch in the paint at first. Then I realized, "hey we're not looking at my car here... there's no way there's a scratch in the paint".
Hey, you're right. What is that?
Never mind. I was looking at it on my laptop. I went in the office and saw that was the reflection of the hood strut. You're right, MegaTrixel, we shouldn't have questioned it. :oops:
Tom
PhotosGuy
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 17:16
Thanks guys.
Hey, look everyone, belmondo has a new avatar! :wink:
Marie said, "(sod)"! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Lloydm
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 17:29
Wow...these are great shots...Love the colors..Keep up the good work...
LarryB
7th of November 2004 (Sun), 19:35
Nicely done Frank.
That motor looks sweeeeeet!!
PhotosGuy
8th of November 2004 (Mon), 07:48
OK, this thread is almost on page 2 & looks as if it's dying out, so it's time to tell. Marie guessed(?) the first two were RAW, and... she's right! (P in the rest of you cowards who didn't guess at all! :wink: )
Actually, I did cheat a bit on #1. The noise was bothering me, so I duped the layer, erased the detail areas, Hit it with a gaussian blur at about 1.5px, & then slightly reduced the opacity which cleaned up a lot of the noise.
in the second last shot the car looks like had been in a crash and the panel beating job was not great (photoshop or panel beating ?)
maybe it's just the 'jpeg' quality I see ?
No, it's just that the skyline is uneven, so the reflections are too. That's why it's better to fimd a BIG parking lot without nearby parked cars. It will be easier to clone out the occasional light pole that try to even up the skyline.
That motor looks sweeeeeet!!
Yeah, doesn't it? It has to rate in the top 3 of my favorites, & it's probably in 1st place for driveability. Don't forget that it's already got 50,000+ miles on it!
Marie: Just "Sod"? Not "Cheeky Sod"?
Thanks again for all the comments. More carz coming next year!
marie
8th of November 2004 (Mon), 16:04
OK, this thread is almost on page 2 & looks as if it's dying out, so it's time to tell. Marie guessed(?) the first two were RAW, and... she's right! (P in the rest of you cowards who didn't guess at all! :wink: )
so was Jaime (right)
:)
:p one from him
:p and one from me
:P :lol:
Actually, I did cheat a bit on #1. The noise was bothering me, so I duped the layer, erased the detail areas, Hit it with a gaussian blur at about 1.5px, & then slightly reduced the opacity which cleaned up a lot of the noise.
in the second last shot the car looks like had been in a crash and the panel beating job was not great (photoshop or panel beating ?)
maybe it's just the 'jpeg' quality I see ?
No, it's just that the skyline is uneven, so the reflections are too. That's why it's better to fimd a BIG parking lot without nearby parked cars. It will be easier to clone out the occasional light pole that try to even up the skyline.
:shock: right.
thanks for that.
looks like it had a bit of a smash though :?
:lol:
That motor looks sweeeeeet!!
Yeah, doesn't it? It has to rate in the top 3 of my favorites, & it's probably in 1st place for driveability. Don't forget that it's already got 50,000+ miles on it!
Marie: Just "Sod"? Not "Cheeky Sod"?
you are looking for trouble :p
:)
regards to your nice mam 8)
:lol:
Thanks again for all the comments. More carz coming next year!
yippee
:p
PhotosGuy
9th of November 2004 (Tue), 07:30
so was Jaime (right)
True, but you got it first. Pick up your prize anytime you want. (We don't deliver to the UK) :(
you are looking for trouble
Was it Steve McQueen (M7) who observed, "Half the fun of getting into trouble is getting out again?" :lol: :lol:
Thanks for the "Regards".
marie
9th of November 2004 (Tue), 14:35
so was Jaime (right)
True, but you got it first. Pick up your prize anytime you want. (We don't deliver to the UK) :(
bump
I don't live in the UK :?
prize will be very welcome
:p
you are looking for trouble
Was it Steve McQueen (M7) who observed, "Half the fun of getting into trouble is getting out again?" :lol: :lol:
:shock:
regardless of what damage done in the meantime ?
:cry: :cry:
ah Steve 8)
' the great escape ' man
Thanks for the "Regards".
hope she had a nice birthday :)
PhotosGuy
10th of November 2004 (Wed), 08:16
don't live in the UK
Ooops! :wink: Sorry! (but we don't deliver there, either!) :)
regardless of what damage done in the meantime ?
It's assumed that most of it will be to the other guy! (Not always true!) :lol:
Photo-by-Leal
17th of February 2009 (Tue), 21:33
Awesome shots..... what a beauty.....
PhotosGuy
18th of February 2009 (Wed), 09:16
what a beauty... Again, thanks. Did you see this "Beauty"?
Blown '37 Willys - A Beauty with a Beast! (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=82861)
Peter Camyre
18th of February 2009 (Wed), 09:44
Not seeing many '40 Ford's around any more. Great car and super nice photos!
PhotosGuy
18th of February 2009 (Wed), 19:18
Not seeing many '40 Ford's around any more. Here's a three-shot!
'40 Fords - Three of 'em! (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=371101)
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.