Another which lens should I get thread

[Toogy]

Ok, I was really set on getting the 70-200 F4L, but I will be shooting a wedding with a local pro in two weeks and started to think that maybe I should get the Tamron 28-75 instead?
Is the Tamron 28-75 better suited for wedding work? I am then thinking of selling my Sigma and possibly getting the 70-200 in the future.

[Belmondo]

IMHO the 28-75 would be a more useful range for a wedding than the 70-200..

Dont forget, with your 10D you're really looking at 102-320mm, and that's pretty long. Optically, it will be an improvement over what you have already.

[scottbergerphoto]

The 24-70 f/2.8 L is also a great wedding lens.
Scott

[Belmondo]

The 24-70 f/2.8 L is also a great wedding lens.
Scott

Well yeah! :lol:
A little difference in price, though.
Another good lens that I'm very pleased with is the Sigma 24-60. (small, light, sharp, $409)

[Toogy]

Yes I am sure the 24-70L is awesome, but it's way out of my price range.

[drisley]

I only read the title, so I suggest this lens
http://consumer.usa.canon.com/app/images/lens/ef1200_56lu_586x225.jpg

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[Deckyon]

Funny, drisley - maybe if we all mortgaged our houses we could all share that lens.

[roanjohn]

yeah!!! The advantage of that lens is that you don't have to leave your house.........you can shoot the wedding from your window :-)

The Tamron would be a perfect wedding lens. Go for it!!! And it really can't be beat for the price (I think they are offering a 30 USD rebate too!!!)............so that money can go for a good Canon prime - like the one Drisley suggested.

Ro1