C.S.I.
11th of November 2004 (Thu), 06:15
Sup......
I have seen the 2 previous threads on wide angle lens' (which will hopefully be my next acquisition)......but was wondering at what focal legnth quality/clarity becomes an issue. IE, Im looking for the widest lens possible (that wont break the bank=> under $1000 USD). I figured ruling out the fisheye due to the obvious.....So I thought that the 14mm 2.8's would be my next choice......However.....I see that the L Canon is rated only as "good" while the Sigma/ Tamron are "sub average". Maybe it IS worth getting the fisheye with those before mentioned programs in the previous threads?
Thanks
Show me a young Conservative and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show me an old Liberal and I'll show you someone with no brains. - Winston Churchill
_______________________
300D
Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX
Sigma 105 2.8 macro EX
I have seen the 2 previous threads on wide angle lens' (which will hopefully be my next acquisition)......but was wondering at what focal legnth quality/clarity becomes an issue. IE, Im looking for the widest lens possible (that wont break the bank=> under $1000 USD). I figured ruling out the fisheye due to the obvious.....So I thought that the 14mm 2.8's would be my next choice......However.....I see that the L Canon is rated only as "good" while the Sigma/ Tamron are "sub average". Maybe it IS worth getting the fisheye with those before mentioned programs in the previous threads?
Thanks
Show me a young Conservative and I'll show you someone with no heart. Show me an old Liberal and I'll show you someone with no brains. - Winston Churchill
_______________________
300D
Sigma 70-200 2.8 EX
Sigma 105 2.8 macro EX