PDA

View Full Version : What is "Bokeh"


stewartlittle
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:12
I've read others "Nice Boken".Now thats a serious photographer.

But what is it adzactly,I know something to do with blurring,focusing or something like that.

Thanks,

Pete W
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:16
Do you mean "BOKEH"

Quote from Wikipedia

Bokeh (from the Japanese boke ぼけ, "blur") is a photographic term referring to the appearance of out-of-focus areas in an image produced by a camera lens.[1] Different lens bokeh produces different aesthetic qualities in out-of-focus backgrounds, which are often used to reduce distractions and emphasize the primary subject.



Wikipedia page = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh

dandan
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:17
I believe the term is "bokeh". It refers to how the out of focus parts of an image look.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh

that link explains it better then i can.

dandan
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:18
Do you mean "BOKEH"

Quote from Wikipedia

Bokeh (from the Japanese boke ぼけ, "blur") is a photographic term referring to the appearance of out-of-focus areas in an image produced by a camera lens.[1] Different lens bokeh produces different aesthetic qualities in out-of-focus backgrounds, which are often used to reduce distractions and emphasize the primary subject.



Wikipedia page = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bokeh


Argh, you beat me too it, nasty.

Airedale1
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:24
That's Bokeh;)

http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h33/Airedale1/pinesiskin2-1.jpg

shutterfiend
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:26
Broken with a missing "r". j/k

jaybird
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:29
And here I thought that boken just meant super awesome bokeh. You know, like, "Man, that boken is so smooth and creamy and good. It's like totally boken, man!"

shutterfiend
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:37
"As a boken of appreciation..."

Edit: Appologies to the OP. Just kidding around, hope you don't mind.

stewartlittle
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:38
OK-Bokeh,sorry.

Distance and f/stop seem they would play a big roll in it,but would lets say a Canon lens @ f/4.0 and a Sigma lens @ f/4.0 both same distance away have the same bokeh?
Or do they differ with quality of the lens?

rigshots
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:39
I've read others "Nice Boken".Now thats a serious photographer.


Thanks,

Hey, if it aint Boken then don't fix it.
JJ

cdifoto
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:40
I've read others "Nice Boken".Now thats a serious photographer.

But what is it adzactly,I know something to do with blurring,focusing or something like that.

Thanks,

I never heard of Boken so I dunno what adzactly it could be.

Michael
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:42
OK-Bokeh,sorry.

Distance and f/stop seem they would play a big roll in it,but would lets say a Canon lens @ f/4.0 and a Sigma lens @ f/4.0 both same distance away have the same bokeh?
Or do they differ with quality of the lens?
The quality of the bokeh will be different depending on the lens and the aperture blades and if they are rounded or not. Round out of focus highlights always look better IMO.

Michael
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:42
I never heard of Boken so I dunno what adzactly it could be.
HAHAHA!! I lol'd at that! I wanted to, but just couldn't!

Woolburr
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:43
OK-Bokeh,sorry.

Distance and f/stop seem they would play a big roll in it,but would lets say a Canon lens @ f/4.0 and a Sigma lens @ f/4.0 both same distance away have the same bokeh?
Or do they differ with quality of the lens?

Different lenses product entirely different bokeh. The physical design and layout of the glass elements, as well as the type of glass and the type, number and size of the aperture blades play a role in defining the bokeh.

Michael
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 07:44
Different lenses product entirely different bokeh. The physical design and layout of the glass elements, as well as the type of glass and the type, number and size of the aperture blades play a role in defining the bokeh.
I was going to put that much effort in, but couldn't be bothered :p. Thats what I would have written though...

Jman13
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 09:55
Bokeh refers to the QUALITY of the out of focus areas, not the amount that's blurred. The amount of the image that's out of focus is simply the depth of field of the shot, and that is a component of focal length, distance to subject, and aperture.

Stormin_24
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 15:55
Great pic Paul... And some SERIOUS bokeh as well...

lbennett
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 16:01
Something that has been driving me a little crazy.... is it pronounced bouquet?

shutterfiend
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 16:06
I've heard it being pronounced "bo-keh" not "boo-keh". But then again the pronunciation could be very different in Japanese.

pixelharmony
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 16:09
That's Bokeh;)

http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h33/Airedale1/pinesiskin2-1.jpg

Is that with your 400 f5.6?

lbennett
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 16:09
I've heard it being pronounced "bo-keh" not "boo-keh". But then again the pronunciation could be very different in Japanese.


Being from the south, I actually say bouquet closer to bo-keh than boo-keh. I guess you could say I was implying the first pronounciation. Haha! I should probably work on saying real words correctly first, huh?

Airedale1
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 18:42
Is that with your 400 f5.6?


Yes, wide open at 5.6

and it's pronounced Bow (like on a present) ka (hard k)

Woolburr
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 20:17
Something that has been driving me a little crazy.... is it pronounced bouquet?

No, it isn't. Bow (as in bow-tie) ka (as in huh with a K);)

disdatmac
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 22:43
I used to pronounce it as "bo kah"

Then after looking it up on google, I found out it is pronounced as "bo" "kay"

But then after googling it today, funny, there are discussions all over the place saying something different.

I don't know that there is a definitive answer! LOL

EORI
3rd of April 2008 (Thu), 22:53
It's pronounced just as it's spelled by most: Bo (as in Derek) Keh (without the long "a" in "Kay").

Don't say it out loud in front of a group of Japanese tourists, because they'll think you're making fun of them (it's Japanese slang for someone who is vacuous).

Glenn NK
4th of April 2008 (Fri), 01:31
There are two spellings, and the pronunciation isn't as important as knowing what it is and what it isn't.

Since the OP asked what it was, I'll try to stick to the topic (;)) and provide some hopefully useful information.:D

First of all, bokeh is not the same as depth of field - we've had some considerable misunderstanding on this topic lately - so I'll post these references as mandatory reading:;)

http://www.rickdenney.com/bokeh_test.htm

http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/technical/bokeh.html

http://www.vanwalree.com/optics/bokeh.html

Hopefully we'll all read these and come away with a better understanding of bokeh (boke).

Chandler.
4th of April 2008 (Fri), 01:40
Bo (as in Derek) .
??? ???


Don't say it out loud in front of a group of Japanese tourists, because they'll think you're making fun of them (it's Japanese slang for someone who is vacuous).

Not sure on Bokeh, but Baka means idiot.

Glenn NK
4th of April 2008 (Fri), 01:55
Not sure on Bokeh, but Baka means idiot.


The Bob Atkins article touches on this aspect.

Chandler.
4th of April 2008 (Fri), 01:56
The Bob Atkins article touches on this aspect.

Cool. My brother speaks Japanese. That's how I knew that little gem.

EORI
4th of April 2008 (Fri), 09:27
Not sure on Bokeh, but Baka means idiot.

I'm a native speaker.

Airedale1
4th of April 2008 (Fri), 10:03
I'm a native speaker.

So, Eori what is the correct pronunciation?

EORI
4th of April 2008 (Fri), 10:13
So, Eori what is the correct pronunciation?

See my prior post above.