View Full Version : which remote for 300D to get? RC-1 or RC-5...
piku
18th of November 2004 (Thu), 11:08
pros and cons for those who have used them would be greatly appreciated. TIA.
HJMinard
18th of November 2004 (Thu), 13:11
I haven't used either, but I believe the important difference is RC-1 allows for the bulb shutter function and RC-5 does not.
piku
18th of November 2004 (Thu), 16:56
i heard that the rc-5 can be used anywhere in terms of point of reference to the camera, and that rc-1 can only be used w/ in the line of sight of the camera's frontside. is this correct? TIA
HJMinard
18th of November 2004 (Thu), 18:00
i heard that the rc-5 can be used anywhere in terms of point of reference to the camera, and that rc-1 can only be used w/ in the line of sight of the camera's frontside. is this correct? TIA
I'm quite certain that both require you to be (relatively) in front of the camera.
piku
18th of November 2004 (Thu), 18:05
anyone else that have used either/both of these? TIA
wolf
18th of November 2004 (Thu), 20:49
My RC-5 does activate the camera in bulb mode. You have to be in front of the camera ( up 25 ft away and no more than approx 80% of center L or R) for it to operate.
rkoshy
18th of November 2004 (Thu), 21:14
pros and cons for those who have used them would be greatly appreciated. TIA.
Why not try the wired remote ? Or the "do-it-yourself" wired remote?
vfilby
18th of November 2004 (Thu), 22:36
pros and cons for those who have used them would be greatly appreciated. TIA.
Why not try the wired remote ? Or the "do-it-yourself" wired remote?
Agreed. Aparently the handsfree jobbies for cell phones work quite will but they are tethered. I have an rc-1, which I almost never use, and an rs-60e or something. It is a plugin remote that I find quite handy because I can activate the shutter without reaching around to the front of the camera.
Both were given to me when equipment purchases. I can see both having there place, but the 60e gets used more by me.
piku
19th of November 2004 (Fri), 00:45
pros and cons for those who have used them would be greatly appreciated. TIA.
Why not try the wired remote ? Or the "do-it-yourself" wired remote?
lol, maybe in another thread ^^ but yah, just wondering about remote ones for this topic
jaypie77
19th of November 2004 (Fri), 09:08
Ok, I have the RC-1 and I have used it for about 6 months and I am a huge fan. I have not used the RC-5, but I have used wired options before and I find the remote to be better.
You do need to use it from line-of-sight to the sensor on the front, but for me this is much more convenient than having a long wired device and having to find it and plug it in and all that. With the RC-1, you attach the small remote to the strap of your camera and so it's always very easy to find.
I use mine for astrophotography, some macro work, and some portraiture. The non-wired aspect comes in really handy when I am somewhere with friends, hiking or traveling, and I want to take a picture where I'm actually in the picture. The remote has two modes - one in which it takes a shot immediately, one in which it has a 2-second delay and then takes a shot. Any questions?
vfilby
19th of November 2004 (Fri), 10:40
I want to take a picture where I'm actually in the picture.
This is basically the only reason why I keep my rc-1 around, the rs 60 is much better for tripod work.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.