Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 MK1 or MK2 Lens?

[S230]

This question may be old and hope I don't bore anyone.
I am currently looking for a 50mm f/1.8 lens for my digital rebel. When searching through eBay, there are two models, the MKI or MKII model. From reading many postings, it appears that the MK1 is better constructed and better. My concern is the internal electronics. Does it last? or is it reliable? Because it is still autofocus, I am only concerned if it will become a problem.

[slin100]

I don't think you should be too concerned about the internal electronics. A well-kept Mk I should last a long time. Optically the two lenses are the same, so spend the extra money for the Mk I only if you want the metal lens mount, the distance scale, and a usable focus ring. If your budget is tight, then the Mk II will disappoint no more.

[S230]

I don't think you should be too concerned about the internal electronics. A well-kept Mk I should last a long time. Optically the two lenses are the same, so spend the extra money for the Mk I only if you want the metal lens mount, the distance scale, and a usable focus ring. If your budget is tight, then the Mk II will disappoint no more.
Thanks, what are the going prices? Also, where can i get a cheap (good priced) one?

[RichardtheSane]

I can backup the fact that a MKI will last. It will bear up through thick and thin. It is though, and can take some punishment. MIne has in the past but is still going strong today!

[slin100]

Thanks, what are the going prices? Also, where can i get a cheap (good priced) one?When I got mine off of Ebay, they were going from anywhere between US$100-$150. I got it for somewhere in that range.

I've discovered that you can often get lenses more cheaply from people selling them attached to a film body. I think those people are less informed and are often "selling off their old camera, because they've gone digital". Buyers who've gone digital just look past these auctions. I got my 28-135 attached to an old but usable EOS 650 for less than what the 28-135 was going for, alone.

[Conk]

When I got mine off of Ebay, they were going from anywhere between US$100-$150. I got it for somewhere in that range.

I've discovered that you can often get lenses more cheaply from people selling them attached to a film body. I think those people are less informed and are often "selling off their old camera, because they've gone digital". Buyers who've gone digital just look past these auctions. I got my 28-135 attached to an old but usable EOS 650 for less than what the 28-135 was going for, alone.

I'd have to agree with Slin. I got my Mk1 for $25.00 at a flea market. I will always take a look at places that sell used take a look at the film bodied cameras. You'll never know what gem is attached. :)

[S230]

Thanks, I'll keep this in mind. but I always thought the Film version uses the FD mount and EOS version does not work on Film.

[Jon]

Canon did make two versions of the 50 mm f/1.8 in the FD mount. But if what's being sold is the 50 f/1.8 EF, it's designed for the Eos cameras, whethere film or digital. So either the 50 f/1.8 EF Mk 1 or the 50 f/1.8 EF Mk II will work just fine on a DR.

[S230]

Thanks everyone, I'll keep my eyes peeled on any specials coming up.

[ron chappel]

Just to add to what the others have said-
Because i deal in 2nd hand camera gear i've seen many older cameras and lenses.
It's amazing but the electronics do really last! They only tend to die if they have had an obvious accident