View Full Version : MONITOR ADVICE
Photorob
22nd of December 2004 (Wed), 12:07
I am considering purchasing a moniter to use in processing photos. The Sony artisan seems to be one of the most popular. My question is how close could a top end LCD monitor compare to this model. I would appreciate any advice.
IncompletePete
22nd of December 2004 (Wed), 12:10
I use a Sony 21" TFT, love it!
Tdragone
22nd of December 2004 (Wed), 15:29
Most workspaces I have seen people post in the forums here use LCD's as their primary monitor (Some use a 2 monitor setup with a crt holding all the extra crud like photoshop tools..).
I will say I do all my photo editing on my Dell Laptop; by FAR a better and more representative picture of what my images look like than my CRT monitor.
Hope it helps...
Maybe others will chime in on what role contrast plays in LCD's....
-ToM D.
brunzie
22nd of December 2004 (Wed), 16:10
I called B&H last year and asked them what photographers use. They led me to the LaCie monitors. I think I paid $375 for mine(19") and love it. The 21" is quite a bit more but I can't recall specifics. I do know that you want an aperture grill monitor and a crt is recommended by most.
defordphoto
22nd of December 2004 (Wed), 16:30
LaCie and Artisan (CRT ONLY) monitors are the top choice. Any Trinitron is after that. LCD's are at the absolute bottom choice of 99% of photographers for editing photos. The Apple Cinema (I think that's what it's called) is one of the better LCD's, but most "purists" won't touch them with a 10 foot mouse. They are just not representative of what your photo really is. Someday, I am sure they will get there, but they are definitely not there yet. I do prefer an LCD for general computer use other than photo editing.
gcogger
22nd of December 2004 (Wed), 17:06
The (very expensive!) Eizo ColorEdge LCDs are supposed to be on a par with a fairly decent CRT, but something like the Sony Artisan will still be better. The Lacie CRTs are usually recommended as a cheaper alternative to the Artisan.
For cheaper LCDs, look at the rest of the Eizo range. The areas where they suffer compared to a CRT are:
the shadow resolution is not as good - you can lose detail in the very dark areas of an image;
the brightness and colour response change as you move your head off-axis, although this is much better than it used to be.
Other than that, a decent LCD is very good these days.
You can get some good information if you search through the Color Management forum at Rob Galbraith.
eosster
22nd of December 2004 (Wed), 17:45
I vote for Eizo or Lacie, if the money is the issue get Lacie CRT, heard so many good things about this monitor. Also, get a monitor calibration kit for this LCD or CRT monitor. If your looking for LCD, make sure consider highest contrast(1/500 ratio at least).
Cheers,
Charles,
pradeep1
23rd of December 2004 (Thu), 02:03
I have a very nice Samsung 900DF which I bought at Sam's Club for around $300 last year. Properly calibrated, it is an excellent monitor for doing photography work.
The Lacie 19" electron Blue CRT with hood is a reasonable deal at about $375. The Sony Artisan is very expensive...close to $1600.
gcogger
24th of December 2004 (Fri), 01:08
This article may also be of interest:
http://www.shutterbug.com/features/1104sb_lcd/
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.