Natalie Gulbis LPGA

[keithallison]

From LPGA Bulle Rock Pro Am

[KR4SC]

I really like her but the second photo is not very flattering.

[keithallison]

Here's a couple more angles, beauty can be subjective.

[KR4SC]

She looks much better in these two shots. I think she is a beauty and a good golfer even if she may be more famous for her TV show.

[downhillnews]

I really like her but the second photo is not very flattering.

I think it would be very hard to take an unflattering picture of her!:cool:

[evizzle]

Gotta love the Canon logo on her sleeve :)

[Aaagogo]

^ I was just about to say that.

CANON sponsor

[AdamLewis]

#1 is ok but it really doesnt do much
#2 is really not a keeper IMO. Its great that she looked at you but is it a good picture? No...
#3 Is again not a keeper IMO. Again, its great that youve got a picture of a pro but what is the point of this picture? What is the story that it tells? Amongst other things, shes also smack in the middle of the frame which is really more of a "snapshot" than anything else.
#4 Has really harsh lighting and I think you need a little bit more DOF. The whole picture isnt sharp as it should be. Again, its also a somewhat unflattering half-grimmace thats going across her face.

With sports, unless youre going for something abstract, you should always ask yourself "why am I taking this picture?". If you dont clearly know the answer to that, chances are the picture is really nothing more than a snapshot.

My two cents.

[jmcder53]

she looks kind of mad in the second photo, like she is about to start swinging at you. which wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing.
what kind of lenses are you using, and how far away are you? i know i'm asking technical questions rather than aesthetic ones.
all i know is that she is freaking hot, and i'm envious of you keithallison