Titles

[PekkaM]

Forum's already looking better! However I'd like to comment on the user titles as I've seen forums come and go (go bad that is). Gaining titles by posting a lot usually (and I mean from what I've seen) just adds to amount of one word replies "LOL"'s and smilie postings, which in turn makes it harder to find the real content. Anyway, I suggest people here is a bit more mature than on your average forum so it's probably no big problem...

I'd think it better if you gained titles by being member longer with post count affecting in some way, posting your own pictures, contributing reviews etc. Damn hard to implement though... ;)

[samdring]

Agree somewhat but do we actually need titles. Of course we need moderator's title (wait, try that one again) but the rest of us could just have a number of RED L's to denote each 500 posts. Then the title becomes just a quick indication of post numbers

[Pekka]

If L represents quality in Canon terminology, what it the term representing quantity? :)

[Scottes]

If L represents quality in Canon terminology, what it the term representing quantity?
Whatever it is I hope it's good because I'm in the running for that title... I'm figuring that I'll be lucky to get one L and a whole lot of these other things.

[CyberDyneSystems]

If L represents quality in Canon terminology, what it the term representing quantity? :)

Digital Rebel ?
:cool:

[samdring]

Eeh bah gum - I don't know

Should we start with collective nouns?

Is it a battery of canons?
..a spectacle of lenses?
..a jock of camera straps?
..a stone of CMOS?

anyway, Merry Christmas to ALL at POT.net