What do you think of my watermark?

[PMatthes]

I know it seems like a silly thread, but do you guys feel the watermark looks good in terms of size/font/general appearance? Here's a couple of images for reference... I don't think it takes away from the photos - that was my intent.

Please let me know if there is anything you would change... Obviously this won't be on final prints, just for internet stuff for both exposure and "protection" of some sort...

http://i2.photoblog.com/photos2/70988-1212556944-0-l.jpg

http://i2.photoblog.com/photos5/70988-1212594947-4-l.jpg

[Anke]

Looks good to me, not as obtrusive as some people get. You can still concentrate on the main image.

[Flo]

Well done.

[ADAPTE]

Nice... i´m not a fan of using the date on signatures, but i think the font is a good choice.

[tomd]

Nice... i´m not a fan of using the date on signatures, but i think the font is a good choice.

Is the date necessary?

[rgs-]

good lookin watermark

and i have the exact same intake manifold on my car :P

[PMatthes]

Thanks for the feedback, folks...

I suppose the date isn't necessary, but for some reason it seemed a little plain without it when I was trying various styles and different content for it...

[Mark1]

I dont like the font. I think it should have some style to it. Not, overly styled, but not block letters either. The first one being semi-transparent is better I think.