View Full Version : Format question
rhodesx6
8th of June 2008 (Sun), 22:44
What format do you use and why? My understanding may be wrong but, if you are not blowing a pic up do you need to use the largest format? Do you get more detail into a 4X6 or even a 8x10 by changing format.
ryant35
8th of June 2008 (Sun), 23:04
By format do you mean file type?
amonline
9th of June 2008 (Mon), 00:55
Too little info... If you're talking crop-to-CD, I generally do everything at 1.00:1.33. It's the most suited for any image size with the least loss. (this is for CD's that go to clients)
iamaelephant
9th of June 2008 (Mon), 03:55
Elaborate on format. Do you mean .jpg/.RAW? .jpg size? aspect ratio?
FZ1dave
9th of June 2008 (Mon), 04:41
I'm guessing you mean the "quality" setting... as in large/fine, medium/fine etc?
If that's the case I have no idea but am interested in knowing...
JeffreyG
9th of June 2008 (Mon), 05:34
I use 135 format digital. I think you can just see the better resolution over the 1.6X format at around 8x10 prints if you view them at a natural handheld distance.
rhodesx6
9th of June 2008 (Mon), 09:02
Okay......SORRY, forgive the new guy. What I meant to ask is about quality(size) and the JPEG compression and file format.
amonline
9th of June 2008 (Mon), 09:19
If you are saving finals that will not be edited again, then most would advise that you leave the resolution at it's original state and save the jpg at a setting of at least [minimum] 9. Most would save finals at 10-12. [10 is more common] JPG IS the file format. You can save as TIF also, but you're talking a lot more disk space and it depends on if you shot JPG to begin with.
John_B
9th of June 2008 (Mon), 09:32
rhodesx6,
Well I choose the best jpeg resolution available (it varies from camera to camera) because its easier to downsize then to up size :) Go for the largest jpeg available, this way if you decide to print big it will help :)
tim
9th of June 2008 (Mon), 23:48
Always shoot in the highest resolution available, you never know when a random snap will want to be printed large. Some of my random snaps on holiday i've printed 30x20", fortunately I was shooting RAW so I can do that. Storage is cheap.
rhodesx6
10th of June 2008 (Tue), 08:57
Okay I'm getting it. My initial thought is to lower the quality to get more pics on one card=saving $....Then it hits me that I bought a 40D if I'm worried about a $40 card I'm in big trouble:rolleyes:
Glenn NK
10th of June 2008 (Tue), 10:58
Okay I'm getting it. My initial thought is to lower the quality to get more pics on one card=saving $....Then it hits me that I bought a 40D if I'm worried about a $40 card I'm in big trouble:rolleyes:
Now you're getting it.;)
Spending the kind of money a 40D costs, and cheaping out on CF cards and shooting JPG?:(:confused:
If you're that worried about saving money, sell the 40D, and buy a point and shoot and shoot JPGs the rest of your life.:lol:
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.