A few pics, what did I do wrong on one of em

[MattSG]

I always like criticism, preferably constructive...
http://www.mgassner.com/photos/riverblackwhite.jpg
http://www.mgassner.com/photos/alamo.jpg
http://www.mgassner.com/photos/bee.jpg
http://www.mgassner.com/photos/stang.jpg
...on the last one I'm thinking I really messed up the iso (was 1600) is that why it's so damned grainy?

-Matt (the same one that posted the infamous suspension pics...just forgot my pw, and have a new e-mail addy)

[BruceC]

first one Is kinda confusing. The file says riverblackwhite, but it looks like a wet raod to me.

second I like but maybe it would be better if you could see more OR less of the lower part of the picture.

love the bee one.

Nice coupe! Is it yours? I have a '87LX 5.0 hatch. Oh yeah and too grainy.

[MattSG]

nope, definitely a river. See the diving board on the far right?

...Yeah, I was kinda debating about cropping the alamo like that. I didn't want the people in it, because it makes it look so small.

Yup, my notchback, she's just my daily driver but treats me well. '93. I have a 1968 camaro that will become the most photographed car on the planet when it gets done.

[BruceC]

cool the mustang is my daily driver for now too, I have a '71 Dodge Demon that will be done one day.

[Bodryn]

If you used editing software you could make the Crockett Hotel disappear and then you'd be back in the 1800's. :-)

I would tend to agree that the graininess of the last one is quite likely due to the ISO 1600 setting. You could take the same photo at a lower ISO and expose it longer for better effect. Photo editing software could also probably reduce a lot of the noticeable graininess on the car.