JPEG July

[Woolburr]

OK folks...time to get back to photography. July has just been declared RAW free. Unburden yourselves of hours and hours of foolish post processing. Take your best shot at posting images captured in JPEG only. You can PP as you choose, the only requirement is you can not use RAW. EXIF data required to show you are playing by the rules!

Discussions on this can be found here! http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=530499 Please use that link for discussion on the topic and this as a place to share your shots!

Here is a starter!
http://www.pbase.com/woolburr/image/99613440/original.jpg

[In2Photos]

I'm in!

[tommykjensen]

Hehe the weather is great here so I think I will go out and see if I can find something interesting to shoot in JPEG only.

[goatee]

I'm in

[Woolburr]

Look....a revolution!

[LeesaB]

I'm here!

[Belmondo]

Look....a revolution!

I'm revolting. (see signature)

[Bill Pham]

i'm in this one too. tire of trying to learn how to photoshop. need a break from it :D.


Bill 1

[Claire]

OK folks...time to get back to photography. July has just been declared RAW free. Unburden yourselves of hours and hours of foolish post processing. Take your best shot at posting images captured in JPEG only. You can PP as you choose, the only requirement is you can not use RAW. EXIF data required to show you are playing by the rules!

Hm, I used to PP for hours no matter JPEG or RAW....but I'm in. Do we get penalty points if we end up shooting JPEG? If I suddenly got a wedding or paid gig I'd prefer to shoot RAW...

[goatee]

You can always shoot RAW + L, and only use your JPEG shots for the purposes of this, erm, purpose.

[Bill Pham]

does it matter what subject we choose to shoot. or is it anything goes here.

Bill 1

[Pete]

does it matter what subject we choose to shoot. or is it anything goes here.

Bill 1

The general idea is to swap ALL your shooting for this month to JPG, not just to this thread.

[Bill Pham]

ahhh thanks Pete :D


Bill 1

[Belmondo]

Does this mean I'll really have to take some photos?:confused:

[goatee]

Here's one :)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3262/2633965056_09a363a9c5_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/goatee/2633965056/)

[goatee]

Does this mean I'll really have to take some photos?:confused:

What all our cameras and lenses are actually for something?

[Pete]

http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/20080703_APER7047.jpg

[goatee]

Pete, I prefer yours to mine. Not fair.

[carianoff]

I guess i don't shoot nearly enough to appreciate this initiative. good luck with your lossy crusade.

[In2Photos]

http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/20080703_APER7047.jpg
Pete, JPEG made your duck look all plasticy. You should switch back to RAW.
I guess i don't shoot nearly enough to appreciate this initiative. good luck with your lossy crusade.
It doesn't matter how much you shoot, but what you shoot! JPEG all the way!

[Belmondo]

I guess i don't shoot nearly enough to appreciate this initiative. good luck with your lossy crusade.

I'll be shooting RAW + Large JPEG. If I get something I really want to work on, I'll have it. I promise not to post anything shot in RAW, though.

[goatee]

But if I did that, my 8GB card capacity would go down from 1117 shots to like 480 shots. How can I cope with space for less than 1,000 shots on a card?

[carianoff]

I'll be shooting RAW + Large JPEG. If I get something I really want to work on, I'll have it. I promise not to post anything shot in RAW, though.

That's how I would roll, smart thinking.

[goatee]

That's why he's The Chief

[Belmondo]

That's why he's The Chief

:lol::lol:Don't worry. The check's in the mail.

[goatee]

:lol::lol:Don't worry. The check's in the mail.

This is basically what marketing people are paid for. Wow, that's a good job ;).

[John_B]

OK folks...time to get back to photography. July has just been declared RAW free. Unburden yourselves of hours and hours of foolish post processing. Take your best shot at posting images captured in JPEG only. You can PP as you choose, the only requirement is you can not use RAW. EXIF data required to show you are playing by the rules!Woolburr,
Thats simple, as I do it like that all the time :lol:

Here are some I just took in July (no raw like usual, and just frame, signature and usm in software).

Glass Reflect
http://johnbdigital.com/special_beauty/glass_reflect.jpg
click for specs or use Exif reader (http://johnbdigital.com/special_beauty/glass_reflect.htm)

Mushroom 3 Done with external flash as underlight
http://johnbdigital.com/macro/mushroom3.jpg
click for specs or use Exif reader (http://johnbdigital.com/macro/mushroom3.htm)

[Flo]

Lol.I have never tried shooting in RAW yet:o All mine are JPEG.sad isn't it:confused:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v299/emmaloudawg/tofino/IMG_6932.jpg

[John_B]

Lol.I have never tried shooting in RAW yet:o All mine are JPEG.sad isn't it:confused:Flo,
No, not if you are happy with your photos :)

PS. love the blue mist in your photo ;)

[Flo]

Thanks John.one day I will venture into the realm of RAW.

[goatee]

Sorry Gail, that photo is too good for JPEG ;)

Hehe, if you get your exposure right, you lose one of the main reasons for shooting RAW.

Lol.I have never tried shooting in RAW yet:o All mine are JPEG.sad isn't it:confused:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v299/emmaloudawg/tofino/IMG_6932.jpg

[metalpam]

I haven't started shooting RAW just yet, so I can play along without even trying.

[Flo]

Sorry Gail, that photo is too good for JPEG ;)

Hehe, if you get your exposure right, you lose one of the main reasons for shooting RAW.
I am still learning about the innards of the 20D..I seem to be one of those...-if it works..,roll with it-.lol.but I need to expand my knowledge big time.

[goatee]

To be honest, whilst I appreciate the latitude you get with RAW, my photography skills would be better if I spent the time learning about composition, lighting etc.

I am still learning about the innards of the 20D..I seem to be one of those...-if it works..,roll with it-.lol.but I need to expand my knowledge big time.

[DDA]

What are RAW and jpeg? New camera model or lenses???

I'm confused :o

[SoaringUSAEagle]

Here's my best so far this month.

http://blog.jeffreyallred.com/images/waterfall.jpg

[tommykjensen]

Dan, I think you have convinced me to use jpeg more. I have shot raw for a long time. But I just got back from a quick trip to the zoo and got this. Straight from the camera with your settings. I have only resized for web and a litlle sharpening after that (its in the resize action) and add the frame and done. I will probably adjust your settings a little sharpening is maybe a little heavy for my liking. I can also add more sharpening if the general setting is not enough.


1D MK III
400 mm f/5.6 L
f8
1/1000s
ISO 320
Sharpness 5
Contrast +2
Saturation +1
Color tone +1

http://photo.klein-jensen.dk/photo2.php?n=20080703_polarbear1.jpg

[Belmondo]

I tried switching my 1Ds Mk II to JPEG, and it laughed at me.:evil:

[In2Photos]

I tried switching my 1Ds Mk II to JPEG, and it laughed at me.:evil:
Send it here Chief. I'll have a word with it! :evil:

[Belmondo]

Send it here Chief. I'll have a word with it! :evil:


Why not?

If I can't trust a moderator, who can I trust?

[In2Photos]

Why not?

If I can't trust a moderator, who can I trust?
I'll PM you my address. Misbehavin' camera! :evil:

[LeesaB]

Ok here is one of last nights game, ok, two....

[Pete]

Hehe.. I have to watch "Waterboy" again soon...

[PiRho]

Alright Pete, I'll join! :D in fact I'm going to go out shooting tonight :D

[LeesaB]

Hehe.. I have to watch "Waterboy" again soon...

yeah I don't know why, but my first round from Lightroom had this strange compression, I redid them and this is better...

[sidx001]

I'm in, I have some from last night that I'll post when I get home...

[Zilly]

my turn

[Zilly]

ok compression has kinda killed it but you get the idea

[irispatch]

I haven't tried Raw yet but then I have an aversion to too much PP

http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j159/irispatch/IMG_3023.jpg

http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j159/irispatch/IMG_2667.jpg

[Stephie]

This thread scares me. I'm thinking about it. I need some convincing.

[puddlepirate44]

This thread scares me. I'm thinking about it. I need some convincing.

If you do, Woolburr will buy you a year's worth of gas for your car. Honest.

[thekid24]

Ok here is one of last nights game, ok, two....
*in his waterboy voice*

Now that is sum high quality h2o

[John_B]

If you do, Woolburr will buy you a year's worth of gas for your car. Honest.puddlepirate44,
Now thats a good incentive :lol: :lol: :lol:

Zilly,
Looks darn good to my eyes :)
then again with all the smoke maybe not (as I rub my eyes) :lol:

[Shooting]

Get CS3 and you can process the jpegs in the raw editor..no need for "perfect" exposure now..enjoy shooting jpeg.

[Stephie]

Get CS3 and you can process the jpegs in the raw editor..no need for "perfect" exposure now..enjoy shooting jpeg.
I've noticed that. I'm game.

I might have to do the raw thing at a wedding next week. At least during the ceremony.

[Belmondo]

I've noticed that. I'm game.

I might have to do the raw thing at a wedding next week. At least during the ceremony.

That's real courage, Stephie. I'm proud of ya'.

[tommykjensen]

Another one from the zoo

1D MK III
400 mm f/5.6 L
f8
1/2000s
ISO 400
Sharpness 5
Contrast +2
Saturation +1
Color tone +1
http://photo.klein-jensen.dk/photo2.php?n=20080703_penguin1.jpg

[Pete]

With apologies to those who hate blown highlights. I liked it anyhow.

http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/20080704_APER7055.jpg

[Pete]

http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/20080704_APER7062.jpg

[Claire]

I'll be shooting RAW + Large JPEG. If I get something I really want to work on, I'll have it. I promise not to post anything shot in RAW, though.

Isn't kinda cheating?? or is it playing by the rules?

[goatee]

If you can't trust Belmondo, who can you trust?

[Claire]

I never said I didn't trust him! I just asked if we're allowed to do the RAW + JPEG combo.

[goatee]

Nowt wrong with RAW + JPEG - just can't touch the RAW files until the end of the month ;).

[John_B]

tommykjensen,
Your another from the zoo doesn't have Exif data, :(
isn't that breaking the rules! :lol:
EXIF data required to show you are playing by the rules!

Jeff Allred,
Your waterfall shot is beautiful :cool:

[John_B]

Even on rainy days there are great July shooting opportunities available for jpeg shooters :cool:

Wet Web 2
http://johnbdigital.com/macro/wet_web2.jpg
click for specs (http://johnbdigital.com/macro/wet_web2.htm)

[tommykjensen]

tommykjensen,
Your another from the zoo doesn't have Exif data, :(
isn't that breaking the rules! :lol:


Post updated with exif data ;)

I always use save for web which strips the exif data.

[John_B]

tommykjensen,
I know so do I, and had to change it for this :lol:

[Claire]

Oh shoot, that means I have to change that as well. :p

[goatee]

Shot today lunchtime. Only 'edited' in GIMP (I hate that application!) basically just cropped and resized.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3155/2635664499_e202e41854_o.jpg

[SapperWhite]

I just picked up my first dSLR earlier this week (40D) Here is a shot from the carnies setting up for the 4th of July Carnival in town. Not too bad for a noob with a bundled lens.

this game is a rip....

http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee113/sapperwhite/IMG_1484.jpg

[John_B]

goatee,
All the posts you made here and you didn't follow the rules? ??? There is no Exif data in your photo :(

[John_B]

SapperWhite,
Not too bad for a noob with a bundled lens at all!
I like, the landscape mode helps give greens a boost :)

[goatee]

:mad: - sorry, blame the GIMP

ok, so EXIF is :- ISO 200, f/13, 1/400s, 14mm shot with same setting Woolburr suggested, 1DM2, Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 lens.

goatee,
All the posts you made here and you didn't follow the rules? ??? There is no Exif data in your photo :(

[Woolburr]

If you do, Woolburr will buy you a year's worth of gas for your car. Honest.

Just as soon as you send me the check and it clears.

[John_B]

Ok I am killing time on this chilly wet morning waiting for the fireworks photos tonight I just threw this together. It is a double exposure done in camera not in software, with 1 live subject and 1 non live subject (a book). The flash was manually fired twice once for each exposure and the 1 live subject was moved into another position for the second exposure. The time between the two exposures was controlled using the lens cap ;)


1 Book 1 Cat
http://johnbdigital.com/special_beauty/1_book_1_cat.jpg
click for specs (http://johnbdigital.com/special_beauty/1_book_1_cat.htm)

[Pete]

Heh.. It's Schrodinger's cat!!

[T.D.]

With apologies to those who hate blown highlights. I liked it anyhow.



Pity you didn't shoot it in Raw, you could recover those. ;):p:p

[Pete]

Pity you didn't shoot it in Raw, you could recover those. ;):p:p

Doofus.

Blown is blown, you can never get back 255.255.255

:p

[puddlepirate44]

MOD WAR!!

[Flo]

MOD WAR!!

Lol...:p
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v299/emmaloudawg/tofino/dragonfly/IMG_7059_2.jpg

Can you read the EXIF from this photo? I just assume people can...

[goatee]

That's really pretty!
Lol...:p
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v299/emmaloudawg/tofino/dragonfly/IMG_7059_2.jpg

Can you read the EXIF from this photo? I just assume people can...

[Flo]

Thanks, I kinda like it too:)

[John_B]

Heh.. It's Schrodinger's cat!!
NO!
Its better then that, its JohnBdigital's cat and unlike Schrodinger the cat is still alive in both states :lol:

For those that dont know Schrödinger's cat here is a quote from Wikipedia
Schrödinger's Cat: A cat, along with a flask containing a poison, is placed in a sealed box shielded against environmentally induced quantum decoherence. The flask is shattered, releasing the poison if a Geiger counter detects radiation. Quantum mechanics suggests that after a while the cat is simultaneously alive and dead, in a quantum superposition of coexisting alive and dead states. Yet when we look in the box we expect to see the cat either alive or dead, not a mixture of alive and dead. click to see Schrödinger's cat (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat)

[goatee]

Anyway - here's a member of the audience when I went to see the Samba band earlier.

(EXIF: 1/4000s, f/3.5, 200mm, ISO 400, shot with 1DM2 and Sigma 70-200 f/2.8)

[DragonSpeed]

Here's one from Canada Day:

http://www.fotothing.com/photos/c8f/c8f815dde675ec95c857d78c252f8e08.jpg

EXIF can be seen in the fullsize (http://www.fotothing.com/photos/c8f/c8f815dde675ec95c857d78c252f8e08_cb5.jpg)

[DragonSpeed]

Lol...:p


Can you read the EXIF from this photo? I just assume people can...

Yup! no probs.

[Flo]

Thanks Dragon!

[PiRho]

Yup! no probs.

Thanks Dragon!

beat me to it. yea, used your 20D :) nice shot by the way.

[In2Photos]

Here is one from today. It was kind of fun shooting JPEG for the first time in a while.

EXIF should be embedded.

http://www.pbase.com/madawson/image/99684068/original.jpg

[sidx001]

Here's a couple straight from the camera from tonight...

http://AboutMoments.smugmug.com/photos/325631521_MYiyy-L.jpg

http://AboutMoments.smugmug.com/photos/325633206_EMjZ9-L.jpg

http://AboutMoments.smugmug.com/photos/325634765_mVJG8-L.jpg

[JAlexander]

http://www.pbase.com/jane_alexander/image/99712170/large.jpg
http://www.pbase.com/jane_alexander/image/99709854/large.jpg

I'm new here, but I'll play! I usually shoot RAW but thought I would see what I could get with JPEG. I hope these images will display. These were shot with my 40D and my 100mm 2.8.
http://www.pbase.com/jane_alexander/image/99712170Link to image and EXIF:

http://www.pbase.com/image/99709854

[Claire]

Pardon the resolution..

[In2Photos]

Here is another from the other day.

http://www.pbase.com/madawson/image/99683903/original.jpg

[Flo]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v299/emmaloudawg/June%20colors/IMG_7468.jpg

[SapperWhite]

More flowers:

http://i232.photobucket.com/albums/ee113/sapperwhite/IMG_1805.jpg

[LindaB]

Here is a jpeg - easy for me too as I shoot jpeg all the time (at the moment lol)

http://www.pbase.com/lindabuckell/image/99711577.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/lindabuckell/image/99670397.jpg


Linda

[JWright]

Here's my first attempt. There is a noticeable difference between the RAW and the JPEG out of my 40D. These are straight out of the camera with no processing at all. All I did was resize them to be able to post as attachments (to keep the EXIF intact). The RAW is first and the JPEG second.

My Picture Style was thus:

Sharpness 4
Contrast +2
Saturation +1
Color Tone +1

[Maureen Souza]

I'll throw one in.

[PiRho]

^ Good job on not blowing the highlights there with all that white! it's a lot harder with JPEG then with RAW :D

[goatee]

ditto, I'll let you in on a trade secret. Use an incident light meter, and even in JPG you shouldn't blow any highlights :D.
^ Good job on not blowing the highlights there with all that white! it's a lot harder with JPEG then with RAW :D

[Nzshrimper]

phew just catch the bus - only 7 days late but do you mind if i join in this one....

[Flo]

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v299/emmaloudawg/tofino/dragonfly/IMG_7574.jpg

[goatee]

Ok, here are some shots from last night - this was with a cheapo Tammy 2x tc on my 70-200 f/2.8.

Apples on the tree :D
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3148/2652781532_5e0d6c9399_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/goatee/2652781532/)

and now, some gulls flying past
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3207/2651953867_1f013b73c7_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/goatee/2651953867/)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/2652781588_62d88d7ab9_o.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/goatee/2652781588/)

[LeesaB]

so, how many are seeing a major difference in shooting and processing Jpeg as to raw?

[goatee]

The speed is nice - I'm actually thinking of dropping RAW altogether. . .

Do I actually need the extra information that's consuming my processor time, and disk space?

[In2Photos]

so, how many are seeing a major difference in shooting and processing Jpeg as to raw?
I feel the same way as Ed.
The speed is nice - I'm actually thinking of dropping RAW altogether. . .

Do I actually need the extra information that's consuming my processor time, and disk space?
Exactly. In fact, I had to recover some images where my flash was fooled and underexposed and while the images weren't perfect I doubt I could have done any better if it were RAW. Downloading times are great, rendering in LR is super fast and exporting is quick too. It might be JPEG year round for me.

[goatee]

I feel the same way as Ed.

Exactly. In fact, I had to recover some images where my flash was fooled and underexposed and while the images weren't perfect I doubt I could have done any better if it were RAW. Downloading times are great, rendering in LR is super fast and exporting is quick too. It might be JPEG year round for me.

Totally agree - and to be honest, I've never had anything printed larger than 10x8

[In2Photos]

Totally agree - and to be honest, I've never had anything printed larger than 10x8
I haven't yet either except for a composite done 16x20. But I have sold some of my sports shots through SmugMug at 16x20 and they were from my XT, cropped some as well.

[MaillerPhong]

Bah, I've been shooting in JPEG since before it was trendy.

'Course, using the Powershot S3 doesn't leave me much choice, but still.:p

[goatee]

lol, well you'll have that decision to make when you embark on your new ship :D.

[number six]

Jpeg is my usual mode. I've never subscribed to the RAW religion.

There are times when I use RAW - generally when faced with a high-contrast scene. Rather than select a jpeg picture style that's low contrast I just flip to RAW and deal with it later.

Going on a 3 day motorcycle ride up the California coast tomorrow. Pics to follow!

-js

[Harm]

Well, I recently started shooting in RAW only, but haven't done a RAW + JPEG. Is there much difference in the shots between RAW and JPEG, or is it all down to PP?

[Eagle]

Haven't taken many this month but these were messing around last weekend. I usually shoot jpeg, raw is a pain in the a**. I've blown jpegs up to 20 x 30 without any problems.

[mikerault]

some form the 4th, I always shoot in Jpeg, sometimes I do RAW as well but have never used one of the raws...Had to resize for display so here is the exif:
f: 18
Exposure: 25 sec
iso: 100
70mm
(70x200mm f2.8 L lens)
Canon 20D

[LeuceDeuce]

I do normally shoot RAW because I'm one of the rare nuts who actually enjoys post processing his images :)

I went out shooting JPEG tonight though, and here is a sample:
_

[SapperWhite]

I went out shooting JPEG tonight though, and here is a sample

that's really nice

[LeuceDeuce]

that's really nice

Well thank you very much :)

[Flo]

Chris.that is wonderful!!!

[LeuceDeuce]

Chris.that is wonderful!!!

Gail, you're my biggest fan :) Thank you.

[Woolburr]

Guess I should post a fresh jpeg...hot off the camera.
http://pbase.com/woolburr/image/100016093/original.jpg

[monty28428]

Another

[Belmondo]

July is almost half over, and I haven't taken a photo yet.


What are we doing in August?

[LeuceDeuce]

What are we doing in August?

Taking a photo? :)

[hotrod1935]

http://www.canonistas.com/galerias/showphoto.php?photo=41032&ppuser=9827

[wu_wei0]

Taking a photo? :)

If Chief does, I will.




really.

[DAdeGroot]

For the first time in, umm, at least a year, I shot some jpg on the weekend (out of necessity more than want - card space ran low and still had much more to shoot).

So here's my jpg contribution:

[LeuceDeuce]

Another duo for the July JPG.

I got a bit confused when I went to apply an output sharpening at the end of my workflow, as these seemed pretty sharp already. Then I remembered I was shooting JPG :)
_

[hotrod1935]

288692

[Salleke]

My humble contribution to this nice thread.

I love all the great pictures that are posted here.

Good luck.

[In2Photos]

One from the weekend. slight WB adjustment and some fill light, resized, USM 85/.3/0.

http://www.pbase.com/madawson/image/100282685.jpg

And from today with a new lens. No PP only resize, USM 85/.3/0

http://www.pbase.com/madawson/image/100281412.jpg

[Chet]

July is almost half over, and I haven't taken a photo yet.


What are we doing in August?

Film only in August!

[goatee]

Both great shots! Is the cat from your new 150-500?

One from the weekend. slight WB adjustment and some fill light, resized, USM 85/.3/0.

http://www.pbase.com/madawson/image/100282685.jpg

And from today with a new lens. No PP only resize, USM 85/.3/0

http://www.pbase.com/madawson/image/100281412.jpg

[In2Photos]

Both great shots! Is the cat from your new 150-500?
Why yes it is! :D I took a few shots yesterday, but nothing special. The light wasn't great. You can see a couple of the shots from yesterday with the Bigmos here. (http://www.pbase.com/madawson/bigmos_first_pics)

[goatee]

Congratulations :D. I love http://www.pbase.com/madawson/image/100281398 - it's a fantastic shot. How is the bigmos to handle? The largest / longest lens I've used is 70-200 f/2.8.

Why yes it is! :D I took a few shots yesterday, but nothing special. The light wasn't great. You can see a couple of the shots from yesterday with the Bigmos here. (http://www.pbase.com/madawson/bigmos_first_pics)

[In2Photos]

Congratulations :D. I love http://www.pbase.com/madawson/image/100281398 - it's a fantastic shot. How is the bigmos to handle? The largest / longest lens I've used is 70-200 f/2.8.
Thanks Ed.

The Bigmos is about 3 times heavier than my next lens, the 70-200 f/4 L. It is long!, but not too heavy. The OS really works well and stabilizes the images even at close range (< 10 feet). I need to use it more to see if I will like it. I broke my left wrist in High School and I experience some pain and discomfort when holding a big lens for a long time (like the 100-400 L at the air show last year). The Bigmos is a pund heavier than the 100-400 so we will see how I fair with it. My next air show is at the end of September so I need to know before then.

[LeesaB]

Film only in August!

HA! But, I do still have 2 film cameras....

Anything in August?

[In2Photos]

Anti Auto August.

Shoot everything in M mode!

[BillsBayou]

I was on vacation when this started. I shot everything RAW + L. Can I post my Ls?

[In2Photos]

I was on vacation when this started. I shot everything RAW + L. Can I post my Ls?
Sure!

[Stephie]

ok I did jpeg for my daughters shoot

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?p=5933122#post5933122

ok so it wasn't on purpose, but it turned out great!

[goatee]

They did turn out great! Really love them!

ok I did jpeg for my daughters shoot

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?p=5933122#post5933122

ok so it wasn't on purpose, but it turned out great!

[paintmblak]

I normally shoot in RAW but thought I would give the old jpeg a go for the sunrise I saw this morning through the smokey horizon. Here is my contribution. :)
http://i64.photobucket.com/albums/h176/paintmynplez/smokeysunrise.jpg

[Maureen Souza]

My cutest grandson :)

[Pete]

Garden JPGs...

http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/20080719__PER7209.jpg

http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/20080719__PER7207.jpg

http://www.the-aperture.com/EE/photos/normal/20080719__PER7204.jpg

[hotrod1935]

This one is of my parents

[Eagle]

Last nights sunset in jpeg.

[Nzshrimper]

ok here is mine - mk3 - 50mm 1.4 - manual settings

http://i168.photobucket.com/albums/u185/nzshrimper/fire-2.jpg

pp work was resize - usm - second layer converted to b/w at 35% opacity - touch of levels.

[number six]

Oops. I took this a couple of days early. Can I still play? I've been playing around with high ISO. This is ISO 3200, noise reduction on the background.

Egon:

290155

[cdifoto]

I suck-umbed.

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a304/cdifoto/2008-07-18-0004.jpg

http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a304/cdifoto/2008-07-18-0070.jpg

[Chet]

Just gearing up for the exciting ALL AUTO IN AUGUST! Be a bit of a learning curve, had to oil the knob on the XTi to get it to go over to that side.

http://www.smugmug.com/photos/335967568_U5jEq-M.jpg