View Full Version : HDR luvin'
bonethgz
20th of July 2008 (Sun), 22:52
This is my first attempt at an HDR image. C&C is welcome!
http://i261.photobucket.com/albums/ii65/bonethgz/IMG_5745_6_7-1.jpg
For those of you that don't know, this is the LDS Temple in Salt Lake City, Utah
FlyingPhotog
20th of July 2008 (Sun), 23:08
Sorry but I'm not feelin' it...
HDR is (traditionally) used as a way to have 0,0,0 shadows and 255,255,255 highlites in the same frame without losing detail at either end of the exposure scale.
(In case you don't know, 0,0,0 = Pure Black and 255, 255, 255 = Pure White in digital speak. Each number is the value of Red/Blue/Green present...)
Looks like you've managed to not completely blow out the sky (though it looks as if there might have been more color than was captured) but the front of the church looks washed out and lacking contrast.
You've also got quite a bit of noise making me think you had to use a pretty high ISO in order to hand hold this(?) There's also a rather noticeable streak of flare (?) running across the camera left tower about half way up.
bonethgz
20th of July 2008 (Sun), 23:16
I don't know a whole lot about HDR, thats good information to know! Would it help to tone map it differently or do I just need to lower my ISO? Oh and this was shot from a tripod, not hand held.
bonethgz
20th of July 2008 (Sun), 23:24
Here's a second attempt with the same image, I can't fix the streak, but I changed the tone mapping a bit and I think it looks better. I'm a total newbie at this so please, C&C!!
http://i261.photobucket.com/albums/ii65/bonethgz/Temple-1-1.jpg
azpix
21st of July 2008 (Mon), 01:38
C&C is welcome!
For those of you that don't know, this is the LDS Temple in Salt Lake City, Utah
it doesn't look good. the photos is very 'hazy' and it's not straight.
MD Steelerfan
22nd of July 2008 (Tue), 20:38
The second one is better, but I think you need to bracket your exposures more. I try to shoot the image with the best normal exposure I can, then shoot again up and down at least a full stop if not two. Tripod highly recommended for HDR. Give it another go. You'll get it the next time I think.
Fabian231
23rd of July 2008 (Wed), 00:49
this is HDR??? I dont know...........
polarbare
23rd of July 2008 (Wed), 12:38
It's not bad for a 1st attempt. It is incredibly noisy in a few areas but it's far from horrible.
Was this made from a single exposure (Which I'm assuming) or from three+ independent exposures, and was it handheld?
bonethgz
1st of August 2008 (Fri), 00:26
It was made from three different exposures (at one stop apart) and it WAS shot from a tripod. I think the noise was because of the quality of my camera..problem solved, I just got my XTi!
azpix
1st of August 2008 (Fri), 02:30
It was made from three different exposures (at one stop apart) and it WAS shot from a tripod. I think the noise was because of the quality of my camera..problem solved, I just got my XTi!
there are people walking in the photo, how did you do 3 exposures and not have it blurred?
bonethgz
2nd of August 2008 (Sat), 14:26
I guess the program I used fixed it? I didn't even realize that!
bonethgz
2nd of August 2008 (Sat), 14:27
This is attempt two at the same shot, with an XTi instead of a 300d
http://i261.photobucket.com/albums/ii65/bonethgz/SLC.jpg
Comments?
azpix
2nd of August 2008 (Sat), 21:16
This is attempt two at the same shot, with an XTi instead of a 300d
Comments?
'
I'm not sure what you did here, but this would look better as a long exposure IMHO. the HDR you did is very dark and lacks detai l in most of the photo.
azpix
2nd of August 2008 (Sat), 21:17
FWIW, i don't think that camera matters all that much.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.