You tell me.

[Azzure_7]

image after calibration. What I see - Warm, tanned skin, warm tone, but it's not overexposed.

I tried showing the monitor without calibration, and it showed overly exposed image(on neck area espescially), bluish cast and pale skin on forehead. Would you tell me what you see. . .

Thanks.

[szekiat]

it looks properly exposed to me and does not look overly warm. It depends on what u calibrate your monitor to though. I calibrate mine to 6500K, Gama 2.2 and 120cdn

[poloman]

Looks fine to me and my monitor is calibrated. Not an easy image to judge though. It looks a bit desaturated and maybe a filter applied? Is it in Adobe space?

[Azzure_7]

Thanks guys. That really helps.
FYI, I printed it at office max and results is okay/good close. . . Not precise but okay close. I'll be trying different print. . .

[tim]

Photo looks fine, on the cool side of what i'd expect (calibrated LCD). Issue is lighting, is uneven, chest more exposed than face. If I had to change it i'd add more warmth to the chest than the face.

[Azzure_7]

Photo looks fine, on the cool side of what i'd expect (calibrated LCD). Issue is lighting, is uneven, chest more exposed than face. If I had to change it i'd add more warmth to the chest than the face.

Thanks. And yah I did that on purpose. I added a vignette.

[tim]

How did you manage to make a vignette that covered her face but not her body? And why?

[conkeroo]

Theres a bit too much yellow in the skin tone for me. It doesnt look way off but it still doesnt look right.