PDA

View Full Version : canon 100 f2.8 or sigma 105 macro or canon 60 macro


jeromego
21st of August 2008 (Thu), 17:32
hi, im just wondering, which of these 3 lenses would you guys recommend for a beginner in macro photography? does the sigma or the canon 60 also have the internal focusing like the 100 f2.8?

troypiggo
21st of August 2008 (Thu), 17:39
I have the Canon 100 and have used the Sigma 105. I'd recommend both. Haven't used the 60, but it's shorter minimum working distance puts me off.

PS - this is the photo sharing section. You'd be better off posting this in the lens equipment section here (http://photography-on-the.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=33). They have some very helpful stickies and plenty of similar threads if you search there.

Stickies:
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?p=779256#post779256
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=160960

Search here:
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=142566
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=160960

macro junkie
21st of August 2008 (Thu), 18:15
i ended up selling the 105mm..i dont like the working distance..i much prefer the 60mm.all depends really.if u can afford it i would go with canon tho..its get inner focus.the ,sigma one hasnt and it extends quite a bit.i only like 60mm tho cause im use to the shoryt working distance because i use mpe- every day.u might find the 100mm alot easier

racketman
21st of August 2008 (Thu), 18:16
60 has internal focusing too, my favorite.

macro junkie
21st of August 2008 (Thu), 18:28
60 has internal focusing too, my favorite.
yep.i just ment that the 105mm doesnt..go with canon ;)

LordV
22nd of August 2008 (Fri), 02:58
Very little difference in optical performance of any of the lenses mentioned. As commented the canon lenses have internal focusing but as a sigma 105 user I do not find the extending lens a problem at all as I nearly always preset the focus (magnification) I want before moving in and focusing by moving the camera. The sigma 105 has one minor advantage over the canons of a recessed front element so it has a built in hood and lens protector.

Brian V.

Eagle i
22nd of August 2008 (Fri), 07:39
Very little difference in optical performance of any of the lenses mentioned. As commented the canon lenses have internal focusing but as a sigma 105 user I do not find the extending lens a problem at all as I nearly always preset the focus (magnification) I want before moving in and focusing by moving the camera. The sigma 105 has one minor advantage over the canons of a recessed front element so it has a built in hood and lens protector.

Brian V.


Ditto for me too....now I don't have and have never used the other lenses but I am extremely happy with my sigma 105mm

dia-lt
22nd of August 2008 (Fri), 07:45
(I'm still solving a very similar dilemma too, only between Tamron 90mm and Canon 60mm)


What is the working distance of Sigma 105mm when it's fully extended?

Because I read that Tamron 90mm has the same working working distance as Canon 60mm at 1:1 ..

macro junkie
22nd of August 2008 (Fri), 08:12
(I'm still solving a very similar dilemma too, only between Tamron 90mm and Canon 60mm)


What is the working distance of Sigma 105mm when it's fully extended?

..

105mm


..if tamrom 90mm is same as the canon 60mm that dont make sense?

Eagle i
22nd of August 2008 (Fri), 08:45
(I'm still solving a very similar dilemma too, only between Tamron 90mm and Canon 60mm)


What is the working distance of Sigma 105mm when it's fully extended?

Because I read that Tamron 90mm has the same working working distance as Canon 60mm at 1:1 ..

min focus distance is 12.3" for the sigma
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-105mm-f-2.8-EX-DG-Macro-Lens-Review.aspx

As can be seen in the above photo, the Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro Lens has a focus limit switch. Use the limit position to reduce focus hunting time by limiting the focus distance to 12.3" - 14.7" (313mm - 370mm) or 14.75" - 8 (400mm - 8). The minimum focus distance is 12.3" (313mm) which provides a working distance of 4.8" (122mm) from the end of the lens (without the hood in place).

mrklaw
22nd of August 2008 (Fri), 08:52
I went with the 60 because it also doubles up as a nice portrait lens.

troypiggo
23rd of August 2008 (Sat), 23:57
I went with the 60 because it also doubles up as a nice portrait lens.

So does the 105 and 100.

ooo
24th of August 2008 (Sun), 07:38
I went for the 100mm, because it gives you great range to start with, super sharp and doubles a medium telephoto.

jm4ever
24th of August 2008 (Sun), 07:48
troypiggo,

Don't you find the 100 a bit too long for portrait's with a crop camera? I've been thinking about a 100 but wonder if I'll be running out of foot zooming room at times.

troypiggo
24th of August 2008 (Sun), 14:27
Aah, I see what you're getting at. Probably right. Must admit I don't use it much as a portrait lens, but that's not to say it can't be useful as one :)