View Full Version : My baby shots are coming out horrible
kekoa
25th of September 2008 (Thu), 15:08
Hi all, our baby is about 2 months old and most of my shots are taken indoors with crappy lighting using my 40D and 17-55. As you know, its impossible to keep a baby still so i try to stop the lens down, but its still not fast enough to mitigate blur. Can anyone help me? Do i need to get a good flash or just start taking pics with my 50MM1.4 in bad light?
thanks all.
http://images3.pnimedia.com/GetImage.aspx/1O57yfU5gDO046NP9pyw4JBtG3UE8lOr1g9eFuBx9SGKoGo0ba EEIIOogGUJvy69BnvqeGbb7CGQ-/image.jpg
http://images3.pnimedia.com/GetImage.aspx/1r0KlsSgKLUjxPBRRJnATX4qR,KB0meKlzVvcXi06Qe4ZTpIWJ amLwa8O2RWyuQdEV,IjOGbaMzo-/image.jpg
http://images3.pnimedia.com/GetImage.aspx/15TdV,bJjW4AH,4,45,40OOyRyR0MUhn8CdMjGuKR0JL9LJ4s6 Bygx2bGGaJwGarPccjjyw4EOkI-/image.jpg
TTk
25th of September 2008 (Thu), 15:14
The shots look fine for a on camera flash? (I asume as you said Get a good flash), and I find Bal/fill flash is better from a flashgun. Number two needs croping a bit tighter, the remote is distracting..
kekoa
25th of September 2008 (Thu), 15:29
The shots look fine for a on camera flash? (I asume as you said Get a good flash), and I find Bal/fill flash is better from a flashgun. Number two needs croping a bit tighter, the remote is distracting..
actually those are all just natural or available light. no flash.
kevindar
25th of September 2008 (Thu), 16:41
at this age they shoot not be moving that much, esp in the one she is asleep. those images look fine. a flash and a faster lens are both options. I would look into sigma 30 1.4, or sigma 50 1.4. also it looks like there is good ambient light. consider shooting at iso 800 or 1600.
TheHoff
25th of September 2008 (Thu), 16:47
Use the window light; don't just accept the baby where it is... move it over to the window. Think about your background - that is the main thing that is distracting in these shots. Try a white blanket or a black dress or whatever you have that will make for a simpler background (rather than the out of focus TV, couch, etc).
egordon99
25th of September 2008 (Thu), 18:33
Well if the shutter speed is too slow and you're all the way at f/2.8, you can either raise the ISO, or use your 50mm f/1.4.
I have a five month old son, and for the first week, it was all natural light with my 30mm f/1.4 and 85mm f/1.8. Then I started using flash and the pictures got much better. Definetly think about getting an external flash.
For now, you can experiment with your prime lens and/or using natural light from the window.
I think those pictures look pretty good as is though.
Good luck!
azpix
25th of September 2008 (Thu), 19:34
get in tighter. otherwise, i think they look fine
Maureen Souza
25th of September 2008 (Thu), 19:40
Put your baby in front of a big window or sliding glass door and zoom in for a tighter crop. Set you shutter speed for about 80 and ISO at 400. Let the camera choose your aperture. Tweak the settings if they are too light or dark. Keep practicing and I know you'll get it. That lens always performs well for me.
NSG40D
25th of September 2008 (Thu), 21:43
I would work out the equivalents of F2 and no more than ISO400. You should be ok indoors with that - or move near a window to get the indirect light falling on the eyes. I do this all the time with a 50 1.4 w/o issue. And definately - compose in your mind and see the stuff in the bk - the remotes and such.
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.