PDA

View Full Version : IP5000, IP8500 or R800?


Speedwagon
14th of February 2005 (Mon), 06:28
My S820 was down last week due to print head problem, I need to get one very good photo printer. Not sure which is better.....

I experienced my printed photo (using S820 with BCI-6 ink and Canon photo pro paper) faded easily after 1~2 months. Is this casue by the ink or the paper??

I'm thinking of getting IP8500 but afriad that I will be facing the same photo fade problem as they are using the same BCI-6 ink.

My major need for the printer is to print photos, so is IP5000, IP8500 or R800??
Your input would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

__________________________
Speedwagon

kb244
14th of February 2005 (Mon), 14:29
8500 , the 5000 not meant to be a pure photo printer but rather a productivity printer. BCI-6 will still do 30 years no problem, however look into the new BCI-7 ( the printer can still use them, just released in japan ) that has the 100 year garantee while keeping same exact vibrance as the BCI-6.

airborne
16th of February 2005 (Wed), 22:00
My vote is for the R800. 75 - 100yr inks. Great results so far.

kb244
16th of February 2005 (Wed), 22:33
Hrm funny how canon is more vibrant in my opinion, but the only thing that gets argued on epson's behalf is life of print.

superbecky79
4th of July 2005 (Mon), 11:30
I just bought the i8500, and I seen your post about using the BCI-7 ink- can you use it in the i8500?

Grimnar
4th of July 2005 (Mon), 16:00
I just got the Canon IP8500 and love it. It used to make perfect prints before I reinstalled my XP, now the prints all look very strange. Maybe I will make a new topic about this later. The only downside I find with the 8500 is:
1) Startup time can be a drag if you are in a hurry.
2) For a printer at this cost, wlan/ethernet should be standard.

Hellashot
4th of July 2005 (Mon), 16:05
Epson's Ultra Chrome inks ar 100-200 year rated.