PDA

View Full Version : SEX


bryanphoto
16th of February 2005 (Wed), 15:49
(i apoligise for the title!!) glad i got your attention

this is just some random artwork i've been working on for a friends website, it's a lil rough at the moment but it's just the concept i'm after.

ChP
16th of February 2005 (Wed), 16:11
Generally it is nice to title your posts accurately. You don't need to trick us, we look at the forum because we like photography and doing that is just screaming for attention.

You screamed so I will give you your attention.....
Like I said in the other post you had of clouds: those are clouds, they are interesting if something is in front of them or a unique formation is present. If I can glance at a photo for a nanosecond and immediately see there isn't any point in looking anymore then the picture has failed. The filter type colorization was a good idea but I think you could have chosen better colors.

By using false titles you just piss people off, imagine if nobody titled their posts based on the content.....

IanBMW
16th of February 2005 (Wed), 16:20
Eh' pic is neat, but Clouds don't exactly do it for me alone. Oh and I couldn't look at your file until I got home from school for obvious reasons. So don't be a Lamer aight

Geeeyejo
16th of February 2005 (Wed), 20:32
Tic-Tac-DOHHHHHHHHH....

Don't really care about the title
(made me look though!) but The pic doesn't do much for me...

dispatchermike21
16th of February 2005 (Wed), 23:16
Are they wild or domestic clouds and are you breeding them or just letting them reproduce on thier own? If your not proud enough with what you do to lable it right then don't do it.

KelliShaver
17th of February 2005 (Thu), 03:05
Ok. I realize I'm new here and proably don't have much of a right to say anything, but that was annoying.... Please give your posts meaingful titles. In this case, "The Illegitimate Child of Alfred Steiglitz and Andy Warhol" or something :p.... Although Steiglitz photographed (http://www.geh.org/fm/stieglitz/htmlsrc/stieglitz_sld00001.html) far more interesting clouds, for a very specific reason (http://elmo.academyart.edu/study/ph101/Required%20reading/Stieglitz.htm).

And though I'm not a big fan of his work, for reference, Andy (http://www.artchive.com/artchive/W/warhol.html).

D Boone
17th of February 2005 (Thu), 05:21
Well, I am not sure what concept you are after, but if its just a background for something else on a website it might work.

MauiTiki
17th of February 2005 (Thu), 09:58
It reminds me of colorcalm which is now going to be featured on Jet Blue Flights. Go to www.colorcalm.com and you will see.

GaryTorello
17th of February 2005 (Thu), 14:05
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=54096

bryanphoto
18th of February 2005 (Fri), 03:34
yeah i tried to change the title right after i posted it because i realized some people may have gotten upset (sorry guys) but had a lot of trouble and ended up only being able to change it in topic.


ps haha colour calm :rolleyes:

MauiTiki
18th of February 2005 (Fri), 10:47
ps haha colour calm
what's that suppose to mean?

karusel
18th of February 2005 (Fri), 14:09
Dude, titling your threads with words 'sex, naked, nude, nudity' etc, and then saying 'glad I got your attention' is pretty old. I canot say anything about your tiles though, it's not really a photo, it's graphics for some specific purpose I don't know of and not really an artwork to me. Especially since the tiling has already been done and done at it's best... :?