noxcuses1
10th of October 2008 (Fri), 17:43
Here's the story, I'm sure many of you have had a similar experience:
I recently did a live shoot for a band. My fees for live photography are less than a promotional band shoot. The band wanted both done, and I told them I would offer a discount.
They pay for the live shoot, then afterwards asked me to shoot a few of them together as a band. Keep in mind I kinda figured they were going to ask me this. I said "ok", but that I am not "set up" for a promo style shoot. They didn't care. So I shot a few. (My mistake)
I uploaded a few hundred shots on my client proofing site (there is a proof watermark on all pics, and they can't grab any of them off the web).
I get an email from them asking where the group shots were. (can you figure out where this is going yet?)
So I added the group photos to the proofing site for them to view.
I sent a note to him explaining those are considered promo style photos, and that if he wanted them, he would have to pay a per image fee. BUT I would apply any fees paid to the promo shoot they had not booked yet.
Well, he didn't like that, and said he didn't want to pay, and to not send the group photos.
My thought was that he was trying to get the group photos for the least expensive route by asking for a few group shots after the live photos because they didn't want to pay for the promotional photos.
I am so tired of people trying to screw me. The reason I put a watermark on the proofing site is because I had another band make screen shots of ALL their photos, and try to NOT pay for them.
I'm curious if there is anyone who would have done the same thing.
The contract specifically stated for LIVE performance photos only.
Due to other things as well, I almost don't think he read the contract that I had sent a week earlier.
I recently did a live shoot for a band. My fees for live photography are less than a promotional band shoot. The band wanted both done, and I told them I would offer a discount.
They pay for the live shoot, then afterwards asked me to shoot a few of them together as a band. Keep in mind I kinda figured they were going to ask me this. I said "ok", but that I am not "set up" for a promo style shoot. They didn't care. So I shot a few. (My mistake)
I uploaded a few hundred shots on my client proofing site (there is a proof watermark on all pics, and they can't grab any of them off the web).
I get an email from them asking where the group shots were. (can you figure out where this is going yet?)
So I added the group photos to the proofing site for them to view.
I sent a note to him explaining those are considered promo style photos, and that if he wanted them, he would have to pay a per image fee. BUT I would apply any fees paid to the promo shoot they had not booked yet.
Well, he didn't like that, and said he didn't want to pay, and to not send the group photos.
My thought was that he was trying to get the group photos for the least expensive route by asking for a few group shots after the live photos because they didn't want to pay for the promotional photos.
I am so tired of people trying to screw me. The reason I put a watermark on the proofing site is because I had another band make screen shots of ALL their photos, and try to NOT pay for them.
I'm curious if there is anyone who would have done the same thing.
The contract specifically stated for LIVE performance photos only.
Due to other things as well, I almost don't think he read the contract that I had sent a week earlier.